Bucks/Miami - 1/9

midranger · Post #481 » by **midranger** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 5:16 am

Over the past two years, our record without Redd is better than our record without Mo IIRC.

midranger · Post #482 » by **midranger** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 5:16 am

paulpressey25 wrote:Don't these wins count on the "We can't win without Michael Redd O-Meter"?

I mean if we counted losses with Redd out last year, and in some instances when Bogut, CV, Mo and Bobby also didn't play we can certainly count these as wins without Mike even if they are against crappy teams.

Bingo.

Different story when 3 other starters and the 6th man aren't also out.

kebzach · Post #483 » by **kebzach** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 5:19 am

Bango Jr for President.

Post #484 » by **paulpressey25** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 5:19 am

midranger wrote:-= Bingo.

Different story when 3 other starters and the 6th man aren't also out.

We kick all these crazy trades around here.....and each day I have a new favorite.....right now I'd be jumping like we won the lottery if somehow Herb and Larry could turn CV/Redd into Pau.

Then we forge ahead with our new three guard backcourt and ride the Pau/Bogut/Yi/Simmons/Dez train......

fam3381 · Post #485 » by **fam3381** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 5:21 am

So long as we're missing Redd and even Mason I'll be happy to scrape any win we can get. It might all be kind of futile given where we're likely headed, but winning against bad teams sure is more fun than tanking.

Chuck Diesel · Post #486 » by **Chuck Diesel** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 5:26 am

I don

paul · Post #487 » by **paul** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 5:48 am

Chuck Diesel wrote:I don