Randolph on the trading block

Alex_De_Large · Post #41 » by **Alex_De_Large** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 12:00 am

Villanueva and Simmons maybe, thats a good deal for the Bucks, a bad deal if they trade MoWill or MR.

http://www.last.fm/user/DPF55 · Post #42 » by **Buck You** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 12:15 am

A guy in our front office just shot this rumor down.

skones · Post #43 » by **skones** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 12:58 am

HE shot down the TJ and CV deal as well, that doesn't mean anything. If Randolph lands in Milwaukee, I will personally walk up to the capitol building in Madison, go inside, and walk to Herb Kohl's office. I will then crouch and take a huge dump right outside his door.

NetsForce · Post #44 » by **NetsForce** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 3:10 am

Papercut wrote:Right, what teams out there could possibly want a guy who's shooting 52% from the field, 53% from 3, and 90% at the line?

Oh and he even plays some defense too (I couldn't find the vid of him blocking Mourning's shot, but this will do):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvo9jHdWl6M

Contract year.

James Jones is basically Rasul Butler 2.0, now granted Butler's having an off year and James Jones is having what will probably be the best season of his career, but basically what I'm trying to say is that Jones is not that special and I can say that with confidence.

Jones is just another role player, and role players are a dime a dozen...

*Fun fact: James Jones is assisted on 93% of his shots.

swede · Post #45 » by **swede** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 4:18 am

I bet you about 70% of all the Blazers shots are assisted period and we don't ask James Jones to create. He ain't some word beater but we don't have Shaq and Dwayne Wade giving him wide open looks like Kapono last year. He's getting fouled on the 3 ball all the time too.

AIfan3 · Post #46 » by **AIfan3** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 4:42 am

I'd rather have Curry than Randolph.,. At least with Curry the knicks were well on their way to a playoff berth before injury struck.. But Isiah had to mess it all up again by getting an even bigger black hole who chucks just as hard as his wing men..

J~Rush · Post #47 » by **J~Rush** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 4:55 am

Zach is good but he needs to ball to be effective, and he's not good enough to demand 24 shots a game. As to James Jones, Portland is 17-2 when he plays 20 minutes or more.

http://www.nba.com/playerfile/james_jon ... stats.html

T.Duncan21 · Post #48 » by **T.Duncan21** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 4:39 pm

J~Rush wrote:Zach is good but he needs to ball to be effective, and he's not good enough to demand 24 shots a game. As to James Jones, Portland is 17-2 when he plays 20 minutes or more.

http://www.nba.com/playerfile/james_jon ... stats.html

The Celtics are 29-4 when Perkins and Rondo play more than 20 minutes... I'm pulling that number out of my ass but u know what I mean. That doesn't make Rondo nor Perkins good players... it just speaks volumes for the rest of the team. James Jones has been playing good this year but lets not get carried away here.

triplet1984 · Post #49 » by **triplet1984** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:22 pm

bahah they JUST got him in the off-season. I dont even think it's been halfway through the season yet!!