+++Denver----Toronto----Seattle+++

yunggunz · Post #1 » by **yunggunz** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:36 pm

Toronto Raptors

Incoming Players

J.R. Smith
Salary: $2,134,067 Years Remaining: 1
PTS: 10.1 REB: 2.0 AST: 1.8 PER: 15.35

Marcus Camby
Salary: $11,250,000 Years Remaining: 3
PTS: 9.0 REB: 14.0 AST: 3.1 PER: 18.39

Outgoing Players: Anthony Parker, Joey Graham, Juan Dixon, Maceo Baston, 1st round pick (top 20 protected)

Seattle SuperSonics

Incoming Players

Von Wafer
Salary: $770,610 Years Remaining: 1
PTS: 1.1 REB: 0.4 AST: 0.3 PER: -0.84

Eduardo Najera
Salary: $4,952,380 Years Remaining: 1
PTS: 6.3 REB: 4.7 AST: 1.1 PER: 11.98

Joey Graham
Salary: $1,596,600 Years Remaining: 1
PTS: 4.6 REB: 2.5 AST: 0.4 PER: 9.10

Juan Dixon
Salary: $2,550,000 Years Remaining: 1
PTS: 4.6 REB: 1.3 AST: 1.4 PER: 10.98

Maceo Baston
Salary: $1,830,000 Years Remaining: 1
PTS: 3.0 REB: 1.4 AST: 0.0 PER: 19.55

Outgoing Players: Earl Watson, Kurt Thomas

Denver Nuggets

Incoming Players

Anthony Parker
Salary: $4,350,000 Years Remaining: 2
PTS: 11.1 REB: 3.9 AST: 1.7 PER: 14.02

Earl Watson
Salary: $5,800,000 Years Remaining: 3
PTS: 8.3 REB: 2.7 AST: 6.1 PER: 11.91

Kurt Thomas
Salary: $8,091,188 Years Remaining: 1
PTS: 6.6 REB: 9.6 AST: 1.4 PER: 15.32

1st round pick via Toronto (top 20 protected)

Outgoing Players: Von Wafer, Eduardo Najera, J.R. Smith, Marcus Camby

For Denver: Loses camby but picks up 3 very good defender. Watson probably starts at the point and Parker brings shooting off the bench. They save money for next season and pick up a pick

For Seattle: Saving mad money. Turn Watson into an expiring and pick up some prospects while opening up more time for the young guys.

For Toronto: Pick up Camby on the cheap to help the rebounding and JR Smith can provide shooting and a scoring spark.

Post #2 » by **loserX** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:39 pm

The Sonics don't have the roster space to do that, and I'm not sure which "prospects" they're really getting here.

yunggunz · Post #3 » by **yunggunz** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:44 pm

loserX wrote:The Sonics don't have the roster space to do that, and I'm not sure which "prospects" they're really getting here.

Yeah, well its more of a salary dump. And they probably waive half the guys.

youngcrev · Post #4 » by **youngcrev** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:45 pm

Looks like a pretty crappy deal for the Nuggets.

zong · Post #5 » by **zong** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:07 pm

trading big for small is kinda detrimental to the nuggets these days with Kenyon Martin and Nene's health

Toronto will probably not do it either with Camby's age being a huge factor and JR's antics

Post #6 » by **bryant08** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:16 pm

zong wrote:trading big for small is kinda detrimental to the nuggets these days with Kenyon Martin and Nene's health

Toronto will probably not do it either with Camby's age being a huge factor and JR's antics

The Raptors HAVE to do this deal. Its amazing how great it is value wise for them. I would be thinking that Calderon would have to be moving to get both Camby and Smith (despite the issues you mentioned), all we're trading here is AP+1st+trash. I would be willing to give up Hump or something else of value to add to the deal.

Post #7 » by **Mr Swagtastic** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:30 pm

youngcrev wrote:Looks like a pretty crappy deal for the Nuggets.

Yeah they take a serious downgrade from Camby to Thomas just to save some money I don't think they really care about saving money as they put a very competive team foward year after year.

Toronto gets wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy too much value for Parker, Dixon and a 1st the others are just bad and have 0 trade value Graham included.

All Seattle does is save some money this season by moving Watson for a bunch of suspect players who they wouldn't want/need.

Pretty onesided for the Raps

JN · Post #8 » by JN » Fri Jan 11, 2008 8:04 pm

zong wrote:trading big for small is kinda detrimental to the nuggets these days with Kenyon Martin and Nene's health

Toronto will probably not do it either with Camby's age being a huge factor and JR's antics

Can you please take the Toronto name off your location... Thank you.

positivetension · Post #9 » by **positivetension** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 8:14 pm

Toronto does it in a second.
If Seattle really wants to get out of Watsons deal they do it.
I don't think Denver should do it but it's not that awful. There should be no protection on the pick.

DanTown8587 · Post #10 » by **DanTown8587** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 8:17 pm

That trade is AWFUL for Denver. Camby has a top10 contract of players not playing on rookie deals and why would you trade that for Kurt Thomas? What do you do next year? And Camby is the only Nugget not allergic to defense. They also have no need for Watson.

positivetension · Post #11 » by **positivetension** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 8:28 pm

DanTown8587 wrote:That trade is AWFUL for Denver. Camby has a top10 contract of players not playing on rookie deals and why would you trade that for Kurt Thomas? What do you do next year? And Camby is the only Nugget not allergic to defense. They also have no need for Watson.

Actually I change my mind. I thought Camby had four years left on his deal, it's only two after this year. Denver should definitly be looking for more.