Raptors' Colangelo On Prowl For Guard
January 11, 2008 - 7:22 am
Toronto Sun -
Raptors' GM Bryan Colangelo said yesterday he is going to continue to try to acquire another point guard -- even though T.J. Ford will begin working out this week.
"I've been in communication with a number of teams, doing the normal course of activity in terms of making and receiving phone calls and talking about improving our basketball team," said Colangelo, adding that acquiring a point guard is a priority.
Even though Ford, who suffered an arm stinger on Dec. 11, will begin workouts this week, he could still be four to five weeks away from rejoining the team. Jose Calderon is playing more than 40 minutes per game in his place, and shooting guard Juan Dixon hasn't worked out as a backup.
Some point guards mentioned as possibly being available include former Raptor Damon Stoudamire of the Memphis Grizzles, Jason Williams of the Miami Heat , and Luke Ridnour of the Seattle SuperSonics.
Toronto gets PG from MN
Moderators: BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck
Toronto gets PG from MN
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,396
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jun 27, 2005
Toronto gets PG from MN
Bassy Telfair and MN's 2008 2nd rounder (currently #31) for Kris Humphries and Toronto's 2008 1st rounder (currently #17)?
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,379
- And1: 40
- Joined: Jan 16, 2005
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 37,583
- And1: 9,333
- Joined: Jan 06, 2008
- Location: Chicago
-
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 20,907
- And1: 3,396
- Joined: Dec 29, 2005
- Location: Jurassic Park
-
Hell **** no from Toronto why move a 1st for a guy who has been a terrible role model for the NBA and is always in the doghouse (Telfair). Toronto wouldn't move a 1st for him as he's not worth it and neither is a 2nd from them. Humphries alone could have got Telfair at one point so why make this deal? Minny would have to start with Green, Smith or Gomes to get a first out of this deal.
Minny is all over this deal as it stands now
Minny is all over this deal as it stands now
Lord Leoshes wrote:i personally would rather keep Chalmers over Lowry
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,353
- And1: 2
- Joined: Apr 03, 2006
Wait, so Telfair's value has gone up this much with the padded stats he's put up on a 5-29 team? You pushed your luck asking for a decent big signed to a very nice contract, but you went borderline nuts when you added the 1st rounder.
We have no need for Telfair, if anything we're looking for a vet point who still has some game and knows their role.
We have no need for Telfair, if anything we're looking for a vet point who still has some game and knows their role.
- revprodeji
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 22,388
- And1: 8
- Joined: Dec 25, 2002
- Location: Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought
- Contact:
As a Minnesota fan I would not want to do this. Bassy has a bad rep with rubes who have not seen him, but watching him play all year you see a 22yr old that has the chance to be a very effective player for us. I would keep him.
http://www.timetoshop.org
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...
- zong
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,289
- And1: 102
- Joined: Sep 27, 2007
- Location: Toronto
-
revprodeji wrote:As a Minnesota fan I would not want to do this. Bassy has a bad rep with rubes who have not seen him, but watching him play all year you see a 22yr old that has the chance to be a very effective player for us. I would keep him.
we know Telfair is a good young player and his little story coming into the league, but as it stands, we need a veteran PG who is satisfied handling 10-18 minutes a game as a backup to Jose as TJ continues his rehab
and asking us to give up our only young defensive big kinda kills it
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,256
- And1: 19,265
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
As for the "stat-padding" argument, I go back and forth.
I suppose players on bad teams may get more opportunities.
On the other hand, their more likely to get the ball in bad situations, receive more focus from defense than normal, and in the case of PG's, not have lesser players finish even when they do the right thing.
Telfair's averaging 10 PPG, 2 RPG, 6 APG, 2 TO.
::shrug::
I suppose players on bad teams may get more opportunities.
On the other hand, their more likely to get the ball in bad situations, receive more focus from defense than normal, and in the case of PG's, not have lesser players finish even when they do the right thing.
Telfair's averaging 10 PPG, 2 RPG, 6 APG, 2 TO.
::shrug::
- Schad
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,383
- And1: 17,919
- Joined: Feb 08, 2006
- Location: The Goat Rodeo
-
shrink wrote:As for the "stat-padding" argument, I go back and forth.
I suppose players on bad teams may get more opportunities.
On the other hand, their more likely to get the ball in bad situations, receive more focus from defense than normal, and in the case of PG's, not have lesser players finish even when they do the right thing.
Telfair's averaging 10 PPG, 2 RPG, 6 APG, 2 TO.
::shrug::
Yes, but what Toronto wants is a competent stopgap; Telfair has never played on a good team, meaning that he is not an ideal fit. Plus, he's a RFA after the season...assuming they wish to keep both Calderon and Ford, and assuming that Telfair would like to receive some minutes elsewhere, that means that Toronto would be trading away Humphries and trading down 10-15 spots in the draft for three months worth of Telfair. Not a good deal.
And if you're laughing at the notion that we would be loath to move Humphries for a point guard, you haven't looked at our roster recently. With Bargnani and Bosh starting, Humphries is the first big off the bench on most nights. Trade him for a point guard and we have a three big rotation of Bosh, Bargs, and Rasho...with absolutely no one behind them. Rasho can't play 25-30 mpg; he'll die on the court.

**** your asterisk.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,256
- And1: 19,265
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Schadenfreude wrote: Telfair has never played on a good team, meaning that he is not an ideal fit.
It hasn't hurt Garnett in Boston.
Seriously though, I understand your point .. I think the "he's only played on bad teams argument gets a little overstated here. A team's success doesn't mean every player on that team is valueless.
Schadenfreude wrote: And if you're laughing at the notion that we would be loath to move Humphries for a point guard, you haven't looked at our roster recently. With Bargnani and Bosh starting, Humphries is the first big off the bench on most nights. Trade him for a point guard and we have a three big rotation of Bosh, Bargs, and Rasho...with absolutely no one behind them. Rasho can't play 25-30 mpg; he'll die on the court.
Nope. I didn't make a statement on the deal. I simply was amused anyone would say that KRIS HUMPHIES kinda kills any deal.
I wish Colangelo would have gone into more detail, but I guess that would be hoping too much.
- Schad
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,383
- And1: 17,919
- Joined: Feb 08, 2006
- Location: The Goat Rodeo
-
shrink wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Seriously though, I understand your point .. I think the "he's only played on bad teams argument gets a little overstated here. A team's success doesn't mean every player on that team is valueless.
Playing on a bad team doesn't kill a player's value outright. For me, it's the fact that, as a point guard, he would be expected to run the offense for stretches that concerns me; Telfair is one of the few regulars in the league averaging under 1 point per shot, and lacking in experience under the bright lights of a playoff drive, and for that reason I'd rather bring in a mediocre, but less inconsistent vet. Especially if a 1st + our best big off the bench (ugh.) is the asking price.
Nope. I didn't make a statement on the deal. I simply was amused anyone would say that KRIS HUMPHIES kinda kills any deal.
Heh, Humphries will likely be a bench player throughout his career, but this season he's actually playing quite well; he's only 22, signed to a very cheap contract through '10/'11, and has per/40 averages of 16.9 points and 11.4 rebs a game...he's still (and always will be) as dumb as a brick, but I'd no longer consider him filler.

**** your asterisk.
- Schad
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,383
- And1: 17,919
- Joined: Feb 08, 2006
- Location: The Goat Rodeo
-
kandiking wrote:wow so kris humphries is now in a league with balkman as far as "worst player that's considered untouchable by its fanbase"
Pay attention...no one is calling him untouchable. "More than filler" (ie., not a guy we're looking to give away virtually for free) does not mean that we expect a star in return. Just that Humphries likely has more value to a size- and rebounding-starved Raptors team than to anyone else. And since no one is likely to offer anything of value for him, we'd just as soon keep him.

**** your asterisk.
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,396
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jun 27, 2005
Wow, I guess I totally misjudged Humph's value in Toronto. Sorry, my bad. Admitedly I was going off his stat line (specifically 15 minutes per game) since I'm not too familiar with the Raps' rotation.
Funny thing is, I first considered a straight up offer, but figured Wolves fans would turn it down as we need Telfair the PG more than we need 6 points and 4 rebounds from a backup PF/C.
I'm kinda torn on the "per 40" argument. I think its fine to compare stats if one guy plays 30 minutes and one guy plays 36, for example. But when you try to argue the per-40 stats for a guy who only plays 15 minutes per game, my response is "if he's that good, why isnt he playing more minutes?"
Funny thing is, I first considered a straight up offer, but figured Wolves fans would turn it down as we need Telfair the PG more than we need 6 points and 4 rebounds from a backup PF/C.
Schadenfreude wrote:and has per/40 averages of 16.9 points and 11.4 rebs a game
I'm kinda torn on the "per 40" argument. I think its fine to compare stats if one guy plays 30 minutes and one guy plays 36, for example. But when you try to argue the per-40 stats for a guy who only plays 15 minutes per game, my response is "if he's that good, why isnt he playing more minutes?"
- Schad
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,383
- And1: 17,919
- Joined: Feb 08, 2006
- Location: The Goat Rodeo
-
MN Die Hard wrote:Wow, I guess I totally misjudged Humph's value in Toronto. Sorry, my bad. Admitedly I was going off his stat line (specifically 15 minutes per game) since I'm not too familiar with the Raps' rotation.
Funny thing is, I first considered a straight up offer, but figured Wolves fans would turn it down as we need Telfair the PG more than we need 6 points and 4 rebounds from a backup PF/C.
I'm kinda torn on the "per 40" argument. I think its fine to compare stats if one guy plays 30 minutes and one guy plays 36, for example. But when you try to argue the per-40 stats for a guy who only plays 15 minutes per game, my response is "if he's that good, why isnt he playing more minutes?"
That's definitely valid, and Hump's stats do need to be taken with a grain of salt for that reason. I posted the /40's not because I think Hump will ever be a 17/11 guy playing starter's minutes, but rather to indicate that he's playing competently and productively in his current role.
And I fully understand Minny not jumping on a straight-up trade; with Jefferson, Smith, Gomes, and company, you're not hurting for capable rebounders.

**** your asterisk.
- raps4life~
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,664
- And1: 25
- Joined: Mar 13, 2007
- Location: California
-
Return to Trades and Transactions