Raptor fans: Biggest trolls on Realgm?
Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford
Raptor fans: Biggest trolls on Realgm?
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,017
- And1: 1,130
- Joined: Jul 01, 2006
- Location: Basketball Court
Raptor fans: Biggest trolls on Realgm?
Why do we have so many bad reputations as trolls? like why ppl in this forum feel a need to troll?
im a raptors fan by the way
im a raptors fan by the way
ILIKEBASKETSBALL
- S.W.A.N
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,692
- And1: 3,273
- Joined: Aug 11, 2004
- Location: Sick Wicked And Nasty
-
Should not suprise you. We have a very large fan base on the internet and a majority of that fan base is fairly immature. Likely has a lot with age so it is rather possible that all our rowdy rap fans may grow into intelligent well behaved posters but for now we have the distinct honour of being the biggests trolls on realgm. Not to mention the most bi-polar
We the North
Re: Raptor fans: Biggest trolls on Realgm?
- peteyjones13
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,093
- And1: 357
- Joined: Apr 20, 2007
Re: Raptor fans: Biggest trolls on Realgm?
alfie123 wrote:Why do we have so many bad reputations as trolls? like why ppl in this forum feel a need to troll?
im a raptors fan by the way
It's just interesting to see our opponents game threads, and see what they're saying about the Raptors, and what they're saying about our players after watch them play.
Re: Raptor fans: Biggest trolls on Realgm?
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,026
- And1: 0
- Joined: Dec 16, 2004
- Location: Mississauga
Re: Raptor fans: Biggest trolls on Realgm?
peteyjones13 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
It's just interesting to see our opponents game threads, and see what they're saying about the Raptors, and what they're saying about our players after watch them play.
I read what other fans have to say about the raptors after every game, and i'm sure most of the raptors realgmr's do the same, but i wouldnt call that trolling. There's a big diff.
Trolling= posting useless, bashful comments that stir up a board.
Curiosity= roaming other boards to READ what others are saying and (possibly) discuss in a CIVILIZED manner

"I'm here to win games, not to be the best player in the league." -Jose Calderon
- Harry Palmer
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 42,595
- And1: 5,896
- Joined: Sep 16, 2004
- Location: It’s all a bit vague.
- Tommy Udo 6
- Global Mod
- Posts: 42,507
- And1: 28
- Joined: Jun 13, 2003
- Location: San Francisco/East Bay CA
Trolling by "Raptor fans" was a severe problem early last season....
The problem was that i didnt recognize any of them as being regular posters on this Forum. They were almost all "Ballboys", indicating that they recently are jumping on the bandwagon.
The odd part was that they would come troll the Bulls Board even when nothing negative was being written about the Raptors.
However, there has been no problem in a long time - at least with the Bulls Board
The problem was that i didnt recognize any of them as being regular posters on this Forum. They were almost all "Ballboys", indicating that they recently are jumping on the bandwagon.
The odd part was that they would come troll the Bulls Board even when nothing negative was being written about the Raptors.
However, there has been no problem in a long time - at least with the Bulls Board
The gem cannot be polished without friction, nor man perfected without trials.
- -- Chinese proverb
- -- Chinese proverb
Re: Raptor fans: Biggest trolls on Realgm?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 1,511
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 10, 2006
Re: Raptor fans: Biggest trolls on Realgm?
Justina wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
I read what other fans have to say about the raptors after every game, and i'm sure most of the raptors realgmr's do the same, but i wouldnt call that trolling. There's a big diff.
Trolling= posting useless, bashful comments that stir up a board.
Curiosity= roaming other boards to READ what others are saying and (possibly) discuss in a CIVILIZED manner
Great Definition of some of the Raptors fans here.
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,557
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 30, 2004
- La princesa
- Junior
- Posts: 455
- And1: 3
- Joined: Nov 10, 2007
- Location: Brampton ,On,Canada
- Harry Palmer
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 42,595
- And1: 5,896
- Joined: Sep 16, 2004
- Location: It’s all a bit vague.
I think a lot of it comes down to the Canada thing. In 3 ways:
1) We get less exposure to non-local games than most American fans.
2) We have less deep-rooted history with the game, both playing and watching.
3) The whole 'anti-Canadian bias'.
Now I think #3 has, in fact, happened at times, most specifically in the period just before Carter re-signed here, when people like Vescey and the like were staking their reps on the fact that VC would want to 'come home' to the US, but I think it's a lot more rare than people suppose, and in terms of the league itself, probably if anything the reverse is true, with internationalism being Stern's pet project.
But for the first 2, it's unfortunate because no one's really to blame, but the fact is our fan base is more isolated in their exposure, and when you couple that with the emphatically homerish vocal stylings of our most prominent announcer, and it creates an atmosphere where people are prone to inflate our players and, then, when faced with disagreement, assume it's basis isn't legit, therefore must be founded in bias or antagonism or whatever.
For example, Mr. Swirsky will routinely suggest that Calderon should be in the ASG. Now there may be a legit argument for that, but there are also VERY legit counter-arguments. The basis of Mr. Swirsky's claim is JC's play in his recent starts, but the obvious rebuttal is that we would probably want a much greater basis for suggesting another player should be in the ASG over people who have proved it longer were they not Raptors.
But this is never presented, and the fan-base, largely relying on Mr. Swirsky's take on where our players fit into the league, as short of the Sports pack I have or a satellite, are only able to see a few non-Raps games a week, if that. Additionally, many of our newer fans are even less able to view NBA games, rooting as they do from Europe.
So the confluence of events, coupled with a site which we dominate in numbers, probably is a bit of a perfect storm for producing an aggressively biased take on things.
I do agree that our sheer numbers account for a lot of it, but I think it's disingenuous to suggest that's all it is.
1) We get less exposure to non-local games than most American fans.
2) We have less deep-rooted history with the game, both playing and watching.
3) The whole 'anti-Canadian bias'.
Now I think #3 has, in fact, happened at times, most specifically in the period just before Carter re-signed here, when people like Vescey and the like were staking their reps on the fact that VC would want to 'come home' to the US, but I think it's a lot more rare than people suppose, and in terms of the league itself, probably if anything the reverse is true, with internationalism being Stern's pet project.
But for the first 2, it's unfortunate because no one's really to blame, but the fact is our fan base is more isolated in their exposure, and when you couple that with the emphatically homerish vocal stylings of our most prominent announcer, and it creates an atmosphere where people are prone to inflate our players and, then, when faced with disagreement, assume it's basis isn't legit, therefore must be founded in bias or antagonism or whatever.
For example, Mr. Swirsky will routinely suggest that Calderon should be in the ASG. Now there may be a legit argument for that, but there are also VERY legit counter-arguments. The basis of Mr. Swirsky's claim is JC's play in his recent starts, but the obvious rebuttal is that we would probably want a much greater basis for suggesting another player should be in the ASG over people who have proved it longer were they not Raptors.
But this is never presented, and the fan-base, largely relying on Mr. Swirsky's take on where our players fit into the league, as short of the Sports pack I have or a satellite, are only able to see a few non-Raps games a week, if that. Additionally, many of our newer fans are even less able to view NBA games, rooting as they do from Europe.
So the confluence of events, coupled with a site which we dominate in numbers, probably is a bit of a perfect storm for producing an aggressively biased take on things.
I do agree that our sheer numbers account for a lot of it, but I think it's disingenuous to suggest that's all it is.
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 8,460
- And1: 7
- Joined: Mar 07, 2007
Harry Palmer wrote:I think a lot of it comes down to the Canada thing. In 3 ways:
1) We get less exposure to non-local games than most American fans.
2) We have less deep-rooted history with the game, both playing and watching.
3) The whole 'anti-Canadian bias'.
Now I think #3 has, in fact, happened at times, most specifically in the period just before Carter re-signed here, when people like Vescey and the like were staking their reps on the fact that VC would want to 'come home' to the US, but I think it's a lot more rare than people suppose, and in terms of the league itself, probably if anything the reverse is true, with internationalism being Stern's pet project.
But for the first 2, it's unfortunate because no one's really to blame, but the fact is our fan base is more isolated in their exposure, and when you couple that with the emphatically homerish vocal stylings of our most prominent announcer, and it creates an atmosphere where people are prone to inflate our players and, then, when faced with disagreement, assume it's basis isn't legit, therefore must be founded in bias or antagonism or whatever.
For example, Mr. Swirsky will routinely suggest that Calderon should be in the ASG. Now there may be a legit argument for that, but there are also VERY legit counter-arguments. The basis of Mr. Swirsky's claim is JC's play in his recent starts, but the obvious rebuttal is that we would probably want a much greater basis for suggesting another player should be in the ASG over people who have proved it longer were they not Raptors.
But this is never presented, and the fan-base, largely relying on Mr. Swirsky's take on where our players fit into the league, as short of the Sports pack I have or a satellite, are only able to see a few non-Raps games a week, if that. Additionally, many of our newer fans are even less able to view NBA games, rooting as they do from Europe.
So the confluence of events, coupled with a site which we dominate in numbers, probably is a bit of a perfect storm for producing an aggressively biased take on things.
I do agree that our sheer numbers account for a lot of it, but I think it's disingenuous to suggest that's all it is.
Sadly this is true.. many times I go to opposing teams gamethreads and I see things from Raptors trolls like "Moon will stop so and so (Lebron, Durant, Roy) easily and dunk on him too", "we're an elite team and better than your mediocre team", "we have two all-star pgs", and even "we're better than you now and we have a brighter future than you" in reference to Portland... things that are exaggerations and blind homerism, and basically a plea that you want the opposing fans to acknowledge some of the stretches about our team that Chuck cultivates and bandwagon fans believe... keep that stuff here, opposing teams fans could give a **** about our team or players, and especially on their own forum... whether its close to reality or not some of the stuff must sound unbelievably stupid, especially if they never watch our team..