ORL/IND

Cammo101 · Post #1 » by **Cammo101** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:44 am

Orlando Trade Breakdown

Change in Team Outlook: +2.8 ppg, +7.1 rpg, and +4.0 apg.

Incoming Players

Jeff Foster
6-11 C / PF from Southwest Texas State
5.8 ppg, 8.4 rpg, 1.5 apg in 23.2 minutes

Jamaal Tinsley
6-1 PG from Iowa State
13.9 ppg, 4.0 rpg, 8.6 apg in 34.8 minutes

Outgoing Players

Keyon Dooling
6-3 PG from Missouri
8.3 ppg, 1.4 rpg, 1.8 apg in 18.9 minutes

Pat Garrity
6-9 PF from Notre Dame
2.3 ppg, 2.0 rpg, 0.6 apg in 12.5 minutes

Carlos Arroyo
6-2 PG from Florida International
6.3 ppg, 1.9 rpg, 3.7 apg in 18.8 minutes

2nd round pick

Indiana Trade Breakdown

Change in Team Outlook: -2.8 ppg, -7.1 rpg, and -4.0 apg.

Incoming Players

Keyon Dooling
6-3 PG from Missouri
8.3 ppg, 1.4 rpg, 1.8 apg in 18.9 minutes

Pat Garrity
6-9 PF from Notre Dame
2.3 ppg, 2.0 rpg, 0.6 apg in 12.5 minutes

Carlos Arroyo
6-2 PG from Florida International
6.3 ppg, 1.9 rpg, 3.7 apg in 18.8 minutes

2nd round pick

Outgoing Players

Jeff Foster
6-11 C / PF from Southwest Texas State
5.8 ppg, 8.4 rpg, 1.5 apg in 23.2 minutes

Jamaal Tinsley
6-1 PG from Iowa State
13.9 ppg, 4.0 rpg, 8.6 apg in 34.8 minutes

Why for Orlando: The Magic fill their needs on the cheap. Tinsley is a solid PG who will fit nicely into SVG's system. Foster is the dirty work PF the Magic desperately need.

Why for Indy: Indy is going nowhere in a hurry with their current roster. They manage to get expiring contracts for 2 of their uglier contracts and finally start to rebuild around Granger, Dunleavy, and JO.

Bac2Basics · Post #2 » by **Bac2Basics** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:47 am

lazy cut & paste posting :banghead:

Bad deal for Pacers

rela · Post #3 » by **rela** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 11:13 am

sorry but tinsleys and foster value is not nearly that low

WarFan · Post #4 » by **WarFan** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 11:14 am

How about we combine this with the other trade seen here:
http://www.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?t=749406

Throw in Andre Owens to balance the rosters a bit and we get:

Orl sends: Arroyo, Dooling, Battie, Redick, Garrity
Orl gets: Tinsley, Murphy, Foster, Harrison, Owens

Ind sends: Tinsley, Murphy, Foster, Harrison, Owens
Ind gets: Arroyo, Dooling, Battie, Redick, Garrity

Better?

Cammo101 · Post #5 » by **Cammo101** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 11:46 am

rela wrote:sorry but tinsleys and foster value is not nearly that low

Of course it is. Indy has been trying to move Tinsley for years.

Pacersike · Post #6 » by **Pacersike** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 1:47 pm

Not that low that we need to chip in Foster(one of our better contracts) to get some expirings.
I'm pretty sure Tinsley can catch expirings on his own. Not that I would do it for Arroyo, Dooling and Garrity.

MagicFan3 · Post #7 » by **MagicFan3** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 4:35 pm

We would even cut Foster out and just do Tinsley for expirings. Don't tell me the Pacers wouldn't jump at that.

ahartleyvu · Post #8 » by **ahartleyvu** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:59 pm

Probably.

No way are we trading Foster though. No thanks.

I would still rather trade Murphy. Don't you guys still need another big?

"Orl sends: Arroyo, Dooling, Battie, Redick, Garrity
Orl gets: Tinsley, Murphy, Foster, Harrison, Owens

Ind sends: Tinsley, Murphy, Foster, Harrison, Owens
Ind gets: Arroyo, Dooling, Battie, Redick, Garrity "

We wouldn't have any big man depth. JO would have to move to center, and even then we wouldn't have a back up. Take out Foster + Battie (it should still work in trade checker)

Daniels - Arroyo - Dooling
Dunleavy - Rush - Redick
Granger - Williams - Rush
JO - Williams - Garrity
Foster - JO

We could run alot of quick lineups (Daniels/Dunleavy/Granger/Williams/JO). This leaves us with only one bad contract (Dunleavy) and it could easily be argued that he is playing up to his contract ATM.