Kings - Pacers

Moderators: BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck

Smills91
Banned User
Posts: 23,364
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Location: Ronald Reagan is my political hero.

 

Post#21 » by Smills91 » Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:11 pm

Hoops23 wrote:Is Martin better than JO? How huge is the difference for the Pacer to take on the contracts of SAR and K. Thomas?


Those contracts are necessary as salary filler more than anything...in order to land Martin who is 6 years younger than JO, those contracts HAVE to go out to match salaries.
User avatar
Hoops23
General Manager
Posts: 8,845
And1: 1,301
Joined: Jan 15, 2003
Location: City of Angels
   

 

Post#22 » by Hoops23 » Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:27 pm

Smills91 wrote: Those contracts are necessary as salary filler more than anything...in order to land Martin who is 6 years younger than JO, those contracts HAVE to go out to match salaries.
O yeah! As salary fillers!? Nice reasoning. LOL! :lol:
How about replacing K. Thomas & SAR with Bibby? The salaries match too.

Talent wise, the difference between JO and martin is not huge to take on the contracts of K. Thomas & SAR
User avatar
D' Winner Within
Junior
Posts: 367
And1: 10
Joined: May 07, 2004
   

 

Post#23 » by D' Winner Within » Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:33 pm

The Kings should just buyout the contracts of K. Thomas and SAR.
gswhoops
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 34,350
And1: 5,960
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
   

 

Post#24 » by gswhoops » Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:01 pm

Honestly, I don't think either team accepts. Indy would want a PG or C in exchange for JO (they already have a lot of options at the 2/3/4) and Sacramento gives up too much value-wise.

Return to Trades and Transactions