Miami Heat

Moderators: HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890

User avatar
Hoops23
General Manager
Posts: 8,845
And1: 1,301
Joined: Jan 15, 2003
Location: City of Angels
   

Miami Heat  

Post#1 » by Hoops23 » Sat Jan 12, 2008 1:54 pm

Warriors receive J-Will

Heat receives the trade exception & a
gswhoops
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 33,981
And1: 5,606
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
   

 

Post#2 » by gswhoops » Sat Jan 12, 2008 4:29 pm

Definite yes from this W's fan.
User avatar
D' Winner Within
Junior
Posts: 367
And1: 10
Joined: May 07, 2004
   

 

Post#3 » by D' Winner Within » Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:02 pm

What can I say? I thought its something centered for Mike Pietrus or trades for couple of players which we normally see on trade threads but for tax purposes!!!

All I can say its a fair deal for both sides. No wonder we don't see a lot of comments in this thread because normally people talk on the negative side.
Zo
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,644
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 20, 2001

 

Post#4 » by Zo » Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:07 pm

I could see this happening if we are out of it at the trading deadline. Not only does it bring us out of the tax, but it also gives us a tool to get a pretty good free agent in the summer. The #2 pick is cool, but not a must. If we can also find the same kind of deal for Ricky and make it a $15MM exception, we'd be in great shape...
BBallFreak
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 56,985
And1: 18,094
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
   

 

Post#5 » by BBallFreak » Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:46 pm

We're out of it, Zo. Sign me up.
loserX
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 45,496
And1: 26,048
Joined: Jun 29, 2006
       

 

Post#6 » by loserX » Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:30 pm

Are the Warriors really willing to pay $9M+ for a backup PG? Without sending any salary back?
gswhoops
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 33,981
And1: 5,606
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
   

 

Post#7 » by gswhoops » Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:57 pm

loserX wrote:Are the Warriors really willing to pay $9M+ for a backup PG? Without sending any salary back?

As long as its an expiring, sure.
User avatar
mistatwo mayn
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,385
And1: 1
Joined: Mar 13, 2006
Location: Yay Area

 

Post#8 » by mistatwo mayn » Sat Jan 12, 2008 8:00 pm

loserX wrote:Are the Warriors really willing to pay $9M+ for a backup PG? Without sending any salary back?


Nope...

I think Warriors decline
giberish
RealGM
Posts: 17,172
And1: 6,943
Joined: Mar 30, 2006
Location: Whereever you go - there you are

 

Post#9 » by giberish » Sat Jan 12, 2008 9:46 pm

loserX wrote:Are the Warriors really willing to pay $9M+ for a backup PG? Without sending any salary back?


Well, it's really just $4-5M for half the season. As GS appears willing to spend up to but not over the luxury tax this would work as it doesn't add any money for next year.

Given the salary and luxury tax savings for Miami I'd think GS doesn't need to add a pick to the deal.
DanTown8587
RealGM
Posts: 37,583
And1: 9,333
Joined: Jan 06, 2008
Location: Chicago
     

 

Post#10 » by DanTown8587 » Sat Jan 12, 2008 9:49 pm

First of all, it would be only like 3.5 million at the the point of a deadline deal and its an expiring contract, and the other thing is the Warriors don't really have a back up PG that could relieve the minutes of Davis.
...
Flash is the Future
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,939
And1: 3
Joined: Aug 26, 2006

 

Post#11 » by Flash is the Future » Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:16 pm

giberish wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Well, it's really just $4-5M for half the season. As GS appears willing to spend up to but not over the luxury tax this would work as it doesn't add any money for next year.

Given the salary and luxury tax savings for Miami I'd think GS doesn't need to add a pick to the deal.

I agree. No need for the pick. JWill for TE at the deadline could work. And it may have been discussed all along. Because Riley said at the beginning of the year that we'd find a way to get under the luxury tax.
Image
User avatar
crzy
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,224
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 10, 2006
Location: San Francisco

 

Post#12 » by crzy » Sun Jan 13, 2008 11:06 am

Deal, but take out the pick.

Miami is already getting cap relief, there is no need for the pick.
Image
User avatar
old rem
RealGM
Posts: 50,753
And1: 1,080
Joined: Jun 14, 2005
Location: Witness Protection

 

Post#13 » by old rem » Sun Jan 13, 2008 11:47 am

loserX wrote:Are the Warriors really willing to pay $9M+ for a backup PG? Without sending any salary back?



No

$9 mill is $9 mill wheter you overpay for a patchwork #3 pg who's been injured a lot lately or your dive into lux tax or overpay your own young guys when extending. The W's are looking to not overspend-to NOT add $9 mill to the payroll...and sure won't toss in a pick too.
CENSORED... No comment.
User avatar
Hoops23
General Manager
Posts: 8,845
And1: 1,301
Joined: Jan 15, 2003
Location: City of Angels
   

 

Post#14 » by Hoops23 » Sun Jan 13, 2008 12:56 pm

loserX wrote:Are the Warriors really willing to pay $9M+ for a backup PG? Without sending any salary back?
I doubt its $9m because the Heat already played 36 games which means a portion of the $9m.

BTW, any PG the Warriors are targeting right now?
User avatar
WarFan
RealGM
Posts: 14,020
And1: 1,506
Joined: Jul 30, 2007
Location: Aptos, CA
     

 

Post#15 » by WarFan » Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:00 pm

Hoops23 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

I doubt its $9m because the Heat already played 36 games which means a portion of the $9m.

BTW, any PG the Warriors are targeting right now?


Keep hearing reports that they are considering Gary Payton, but I'll believe it when I see it.

Return to Trades and Transactions