Miami Heat
Moderators: HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890
Miami Heat
- Hoops23
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,845
- And1: 1,301
- Joined: Jan 15, 2003
- Location: City of Angels
-
Miami Heat
Warriors receive J-Will
Heat receives the trade exception & a
Heat receives the trade exception & a
- D' Winner Within
- Junior
- Posts: 367
- And1: 10
- Joined: May 07, 2004
-
What can I say? I thought its something centered for Mike Pietrus or trades for couple of players which we normally see on trade threads but for tax purposes!!!
All I can say its a fair deal for both sides. No wonder we don't see a lot of comments in this thread because normally people talk on the negative side.
All I can say its a fair deal for both sides. No wonder we don't see a lot of comments in this thread because normally people talk on the negative side.
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,644
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 20, 2001
I could see this happening if we are out of it at the trading deadline. Not only does it bring us out of the tax, but it also gives us a tool to get a pretty good free agent in the summer. The #2 pick is cool, but not a must. If we can also find the same kind of deal for Ricky and make it a $15MM exception, we'd be in great shape...
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 56,985
- And1: 18,094
- Joined: Jun 23, 2001
-
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,172
- And1: 6,943
- Joined: Mar 30, 2006
- Location: Whereever you go - there you are
loserX wrote:Are the Warriors really willing to pay $9M+ for a backup PG? Without sending any salary back?
Well, it's really just $4-5M for half the season. As GS appears willing to spend up to but not over the luxury tax this would work as it doesn't add any money for next year.
Given the salary and luxury tax savings for Miami I'd think GS doesn't need to add a pick to the deal.
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,939
- And1: 3
- Joined: Aug 26, 2006
giberish wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Well, it's really just $4-5M for half the season. As GS appears willing to spend up to but not over the luxury tax this would work as it doesn't add any money for next year.
Given the salary and luxury tax savings for Miami I'd think GS doesn't need to add a pick to the deal.
I agree. No need for the pick. JWill for TE at the deadline could work. And it may have been discussed all along. Because Riley said at the beginning of the year that we'd find a way to get under the luxury tax.

- old rem
- RealGM
- Posts: 50,753
- And1: 1,080
- Joined: Jun 14, 2005
- Location: Witness Protection
loserX wrote:Are the Warriors really willing to pay $9M+ for a backup PG? Without sending any salary back?
No
$9 mill is $9 mill wheter you overpay for a patchwork #3 pg who's been injured a lot lately or your dive into lux tax or overpay your own young guys when extending. The W's are looking to not overspend-to NOT add $9 mill to the payroll...and sure won't toss in a pick too.
CENSORED... No comment.
- Hoops23
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,845
- And1: 1,301
- Joined: Jan 15, 2003
- Location: City of Angels
-
I doubt its $9m because the Heat already played 36 games which means a portion of the $9m.loserX wrote:Are the Warriors really willing to pay $9M+ for a backup PG? Without sending any salary back?
BTW, any PG the Warriors are targeting right now?

Return to Trades and Transactions