Will the Wolves be Spurred?(Gamethread)

Post #181 » by **TheFranchise21** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 4:05 am

The 2nd half was ugly. There was a stretch where I wondered if we good get a good shot off.

wolves_fan_82au · Post #182 » by **wolves_fan_82au** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 4:08 am

TheFranchise21 wrote:The 2nd half was ugly. There was a stretch where I wondered if we good get a good shot off.

good sides can do that too u ,they step up there defense

deeney0 · Post #183 » by **deeney0** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 4:13 am

If the Spurs had hit their FTs, this would've been a complete blow out. I don't want to turn another thread into a McCants debate, but I didn't see what you guys saw today - I saw TOs and bad defense. Twice he had no clue what was going on with the shot clock, there's no excuse for that.

Post #184 » by **Calinks** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 4:18 am

The TO's are understandable. The Spurs were all over us and he was being guarded by a taller elite defender in Bruce Bowen.

big3_8_19_21 · Post #185 » by **big3_8_19_21** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 4:25 am

deeney0 wrote:If the Spurs had hit their FTs, this would've been a complete blow out. I don't want to turn another thread into a McCants debate, but I didn't see what you guys saw today - I saw TOs and bad defense. Twice he had no clue what was going on with the shot clock, there's no excuse for that.

His game wasn't perfect, but turnovers against the Spurs are harder to hold against him (though turnovers against anyone are still turnovers). He made many great passes and hit shots/scored with good efficiency as well.

Post #186 » by **Calinks** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 5:13 am

No highlights. Then ESPN said that we are the NBA cure for the common cold. didn't show us doing one play.

Post #187 » by **Basti** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 11:43 am

Calinks3 wrote:No highlights. Then ESPN said that we are the NBA cure for the common cold. didn't show us doing one play.

did you really expect anything?