Image ImageImage Image

Time to start Gordon and bench Wallace?

Moderators: HomoSapien, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10, Ice Man, dougthonus, Michael Jackson, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23

jd901
Freshman
Posts: 63
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 03, 2006

Time to start Gordon and bench Wallace? 

Post#1 » by jd901 » Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:01 pm

Gordon is shooting pretty good again, which has been the objective of benching him in the past to get him on track. Plus this starting lineup is not playing well we are falling behind to early. It would make perfect sense to start gordon again. And benching wallace well just makes sense because of his horrid offensive and defensive play.
User avatar
Gregnice33
Analyst
Posts: 3,001
And1: 582
Joined: Apr 27, 2003
Location: Paddy's Pub
 

 

Post#2 » by Gregnice33 » Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:09 pm

Time to start:

BG
Deng
Noc
TT
Gray

With Kirk and JamesOn (let's see what the kid can do) as the guards off the bench

And Noah and Thabo (and Smith when needed).

Lets see if Ben can play the point, if Deng can play the 2, and which of our young guys is worth keeping.

Trade Wallace for anybody, package him with Kirk.
When it comes to racism, people say: I don't care if they're black, white, purple or green Ooh hold on now: Purple or Green? You gotta draw the line somewhere! To hell with purple people - Unless they're suffocating - then help'em
~Mitch Hedberg
User avatar
Future Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,263
And1: 511
Joined: Jul 07, 2006

 

Post#3 » by Future Coach » Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:09 pm

so are you saying start gordon along with hinrich and duhon?

if so no, this aint the 6'5'' and under NBA
tyrissius
Senior
Posts: 633
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 03, 2008
Location: the dirty D

 

Post#4 » by tyrissius » Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:11 pm

lets try benching kirk, maybe he'll start playing better
bre9
Pro Prospect
Posts: 965
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 01, 2007

 

Post#5 » by bre9 » Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:12 pm

I think it's time to put Gordon back in and put Tyrus in as well get Wallace out.

PG: Hinrich
SG: Gordon
SF: Deng
SF: Smith
C: Tyrus or Gray

The we'll have 4 people that can score in that lineup. Duhon, Nocioni, and Wallace off the bench with the energy.
suckfish
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,534
And1: 1,273
Joined: Jun 12, 2007

 

Post#6 » by suckfish » Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:21 pm

Time to bench Wallace? It's long overdue.
User avatar
JGeils
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,444
And1: 31
Joined: Aug 20, 2003

 

Post#7 » by JGeils » Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:46 pm

Time to fire Isiah?

Time to eat better and exercise more?
Image
girlygirl
RealGM
Posts: 17,563
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 07, 2004

 

Post#8 » by girlygirl » Sun Jan 13, 2008 11:24 pm

If they don't want to move Gordon back ino the lineup, then why not try this:

Hinrich
Sefolosha
Deng
Smith
Gray

with 2nd 5 of:

Duhon
Gordon
Nocioni
Thomas
Wallace/Noah
Hold That
RealGM
Posts: 12,517
And1: 844
Joined: Dec 07, 2001
     

 

Post#9 » by Hold That » Sun Jan 13, 2008 11:27 pm

Time to start tanking. Stop trying to win.
bre9
Pro Prospect
Posts: 965
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 01, 2007

 

Post#10 » by bre9 » Sun Jan 13, 2008 11:38 pm

Wallace and Duhon needs to sit I would do

PG:Thabo/ Kirk
SG: Kirk/ Gordon
SF: Deng/ Nocioni
PF: Smith/ Tyrus
C: Noah/ Gray/ Wallace

Thabo has been playing well the last two games it's time give him a chance instead of Duhon. The team needs Thabo, Noah, Tyrus, and Gray to play about 25 minutes a game now this team is not going get any better whe might well have chance with the younger guys we are getting blowed out anyways.
User avatar
bullzman23
RealGM
Posts: 14,557
And1: 3
Joined: May 23, 2001
Location: Evanston

 

Post#11 » by bullzman23 » Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:15 am

Even though we all want to bench him, it's sort of difficult to justify benching him with his recent play. He's not there to score, so we can't really be angry with his awful shooting percentages. He's being paid to rebound and block shots and he's done that fairly well under Boylan.

Kirk and Duhon on the other hand...
girlygirl wrote:Sorry, I just don't think MJ changed the game all that much.


www.theslickscript.com
ice9
Veteran
Posts: 2,983
And1: 140
Joined: Feb 22, 2006

 

Post#12 » by ice9 » Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:23 am

Main Event wrote:Time to start tanking. Stop trying to win.

oddly enough the players that get extra time in an attempt to win (Wallace/Duhon mainly) are the guys causing us to lose. If we replace them in an effort to tank, we'll start winning (more than we are now, we suck to bad to turn it all around).
User avatar
Tommy Udo 6
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 42,507
And1: 28
Joined: Jun 13, 2003
Location: San Francisco/East Bay CA

 

Post#13 » by Tommy Udo 6 » Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:24 am

I suspect JR & Paxson promised him minimum number of minutes & minute number of offensive plays run for him

The $60 million wasnt enough - we had to guarantee that he would play

There really isnt too much that can be done about it
The gem cannot be polished without friction, nor man perfected without trials.
- -- Chinese proverb
User avatar
bullzman23
RealGM
Posts: 14,557
And1: 3
Joined: May 23, 2001
Location: Evanston

 

Post#14 » by bullzman23 » Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:26 am

I don't know if we've promised Wallace minutes or not, but I've got to think that Paxson himself wouldn't wan't Wallace completely benched. If he can get his rpg to nearly 10 a game he may have enough trade value (if coupled with Hinrich) that a team may take a chance on him.
girlygirl wrote:Sorry, I just don't think MJ changed the game all that much.


www.theslickscript.com
User avatar
Tommy Udo 6
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 42,507
And1: 28
Joined: Jun 13, 2003
Location: San Francisco/East Bay CA

 

Post#15 » by Tommy Udo 6 » Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:35 am

bullzman23 wrote:I don't know if we've promised Wallace minutes or not, but I've got to think that Paxson himself wouldn't wan't Wallace completely benched. If he can get his rpg to nearly 10 a game he may have enough trade value (if coupled with Hinrich) that a team may take a chance on him.


I dont "KNOW" either - but why else would he continue to get major minutes - and at crunch time - when he is one of the worse performers on the team & has no offensive skills at all?
The gem cannot be polished without friction, nor man perfected without trials.
- -- Chinese proverb
User avatar
BR0D1E86
RealGM
Posts: 17,759
And1: 2,292
Joined: Jul 18, 2002
       

 

Post#16 » by BR0D1E86 » Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:36 am

Main Event wrote:Time to start tanking. Stop trying to win.


Whoa wait... we've actually been trying to win?
User avatar
northbrookTIM
Veteran
Posts: 2,535
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 26, 2003
Location: Northbrook, where else

 

Post#17 » by northbrookTIM » Mon Jan 14, 2008 3:41 am

bulls6 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I dont "KNOW" either - but why else would he continue to get major minutes - and at crunch time - when he is one of the worse performers on the team & has no offensive skills at all?


I have got to agree totally with this. SOme kind of deal or arranement must have been made. Or is that Big Ben is the "FACE" of the team with his unruly fro? I want Wallace out the game at crunch time and either a short lineup with Nocioni at PF and Smith at center or Aaron Gray in there. Gray defense is not that greate but if Thomas is coupled with him, it does not matter.
User avatar
bullzman23
RealGM
Posts: 14,557
And1: 3
Joined: May 23, 2001
Location: Evanston

 

Post#18 » by bullzman23 » Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:03 am

bulls6 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I dont "KNOW" either - but why else would he continue to get major minutes - and at crunch time - when he is one of the worse performers on the team & has no offensive skills at all?


I didn't mean it like that. I meant that I could see it going both ways...

But would Wallace really think of that being put into his contract? He was still an All-Star when he left Detroit. I'm pretty sure he assumed he'd be getting minutes. I'm not sure if that would have had to be arranged.

I think the following reasons are more likely:

* A Wallace with greater stats is more tradeable than an unhappy Wallace with really really bad stats.

* An unhappy Wallace could be cancerous to our team.

* Our old school coaching staff hates playing raw big men.

* Our coaching staff is intimidated by the perceived coach-killer...especially a guy looking for a permanent job like Boylan.

* Paxson is too dense to think that Wallace is a problem...very realistic if he actually met with Wallace to see if Skiles should be fired or not.
girlygirl wrote:Sorry, I just don't think MJ changed the game all that much.


www.theslickscript.com
User avatar
Magilla_Gorilla
RealGM
Posts: 32,059
And1: 4,479
Joined: Oct 24, 2006
Location: Sunday Morning coming down...
         

 

Post#19 » by Magilla_Gorilla » Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:25 am

I hate this team - with every piece of my being I hate them.


I hate Chris Duhon. I hate him like a fat kid hates soup.

I hate Kirk Hinrich. I hate him like Oatmeal hates Cream of Wheat.

I hate Ben Wallace. I hate him like Pepsi hates Coke.

I hate Jim Boylan. I hate him like Staphylococcus aureus hates chemotherapeutic agents
Sham - Y U NO sell me a t-shirt? Best OB/GYN Houston

Return to Chicago Bulls