C-Webb back in 2 weeks/considering 3 teams

GregB · Post #21 » by **GregB** » Mon Jan 14, 2008 7:37 pm

I think the Celtics would make a lot of sense. The Celtics have interior bigmen in Perkins, Big Baby and Pollard. They could use another perimeter oriented bigman to come off the bench. You could start Baby and KG. Then bring Cwebb and Perk off the bench.

celticfan42487 · Post #22 » by **celticfan42487** » Mon Jan 14, 2008 7:54 pm

I think Cwebb would complement D-12 greatly. Have Shard back at SF and tell him to post up those 2-4" shorter guys them him, brings him back to his natural position.

And then theirs D-12 who is about as good as it's going to get for rebounding and shot eraser that CWebb is going to find. CWebb has a lot of touch on his passes and mainly plays the perimeter rather then go downlow so it will only improve D-12's touches. Wouldnt' be suprised to see an alley opp between the two on a gamily basis.

Then you have guys like Stevenson who suddenly become the 6th man, can go wild because they don't need him to stay out of foul trouble and can change the game defensively with his perimeter D coming off the bench.

Well at least I think he'd be a great fit in ORL

theTHIEF · Post #23 » by **theTHIEF** » Mon Jan 14, 2008 7:59 pm

im not saying that Webb wouldnt well with Dwight...but im saying if he wants to start im not sold on the team making that happen...

meat tray · Post #24 » by **meat tray** » Mon Jan 14, 2008 8:20 pm

Stevenson plays for Washington

MagicalMan · Post #25 » by **MagicalMan** » Mon Jan 14, 2008 8:35 pm

thEthIEf wrote:i say that, because i cant see SVG messing with Turk/Shard/Howard...not unless it's a big change...which i dont know that Webber falls under...IDK...most likely Celts...it's where everyone wants to go...

I think he also said "starters minutes" so not necessarily starting. And I agree that Stan would probably stick with Hedo/Rashard.

celticfan42487 · Post #26 » by **celticfan42487** » Mon Jan 14, 2008 8:43 pm

meat tray wrote:Stevenson plays for Washington

sorry meant bogans. BOS is playing Wash 2 times in a row right now, so their on the back of my mind.

MagicFan3 · Post #27 » by **MagicFan3** » Mon Jan 14, 2008 8:46 pm

Yeah, I meant starting minutes as in essentially the sixth man. I can't see him starting either unless we shift everyone over.

PG-Nelson
SG-Hedo
SF-Lewis
PF-Webber
C-Dwight

Problem is, we don't have cap space, and we used the injury exception already.

NetsForce · Post #28 » by **NetsForce** » Mon Jan 14, 2008 8:47 pm

I think Webber is going to wind up with the Celtics - if he ends up playing again. Unless Bynum's injury proves to be serious then I think he might opt to join the Lakers.

MagicFan3 · Post #29 » by **MagicFan3** » Mon Jan 14, 2008 8:51 pm

I can't imagine him ending up with the Celtics because he would not get the minutes he wants behind KG.

Duiz · Post #30 » by **Duiz** » Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:48 pm

Is it just me, or does C-Webb look pretty useless now?

exkonvict · Post #31 » by **exkonvict** » Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:48 pm

bynum's out minimum 2 months. cwebb's coming to LA. i guarantee it. he's a starter.

theTHIEF · Post #32 » by **theTHIEF** » Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:49 pm

bynum is out for 2 months?

exkonvict · Post #33 » by **exkonvict** » Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:51 pm

thEthIEf wrote:bynum is out for 2 months?

minimum. look at the gm wiretap.

http://www.realgm.com/src_wiretap_archi ... s_8_weeks/

theTHIEF · Post #34 » by **theTHIEF** » Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:53 pm

wow...didnt even see that...that sucks...

NetsForce · Post #35 » by **NetsForce** » Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:54 pm

nah Kwame Brown is gunna wild on 'em now, the guy's got skillz you've neva eva seen before.

Duiz · Post #36 » by **Duiz** » Mon Jan 14, 2008 10:03 pm

NetsForce wrote:nah Kwame Brown is gunna wild on 'em now, the guy's got skillz you've neva eva seen before.

lol... He probably has like 7 new variety of turnovers for all of us to wonder ourselves with! :clap: