LAL/DAL

SportsFan215 · Post #1 » by **SportsFan215** » Mon Jan 14, 2008 10:59 pm

The Lakers need a center and a large body in the middle with Bynum out.

Radmanovic/Mihm/2 '09 Seconds for Diop/Hassell

The Mavs get a sharp shooter and a good role player. Mihm will replace Diop, and the Lakers give their 2 '09 Second round picks to sweeten the deal.

Diop fills in for Bynum, while he is out and possibly resign him at the end of the year. Hassell brings more veteran leadership to the team and some solid defense.

Thoughts?

supertruck97 · Post #2 » by **supertruck97** » Mon Jan 14, 2008 11:01 pm

Ha. No way the Lakers get to ditch Vlads contract AND pick up a young C in the process....Nothing from the lakers side has ANY positive value, while Diop has BIG value in Dallas, and Hassell is close to even...

Post #3 » by **loserX** » Mon Jan 14, 2008 11:05 pm

If Mihm is so good at replacing Diop for Dallas, the Lakers should just keep him and use him to "fill in for Bynum".

DanniIce · Post #4 » by **DanniIce** » Mon Jan 14, 2008 11:08 pm

Brown/Vlad for Ben Wallace

SportsFan215 · Post #5 » by **SportsFan215** » Mon Jan 14, 2008 11:29 pm

The Lakers don't want Ben Wallace. He would not be very good in the western conference. Personally I really like Diop. Which is a reason why I proposed this trade. He is a little better than Mihm, but I thought that Radmanovic could help the Mavs with his outside shooting despite his contract. Anyways they are getting rid of Hassell's contract. What if the Lakers replaced their 2 seconds for a first rounder?

Teddy KGB · Post #6 » by **Teddy KGB** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 12:48 am

Dallas has no use for a 1st, flip it to some other team for a vet we could use and we can start talking

Post #7 » by **catalyst** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 1:24 am

Diop is the D end of the Mavs C rotation. Mohm does not fill that role, mavs do not need him. Now talk about Wallace to Dal, and we can begin the discussion.

SportsFan215 · Post #8 » by **SportsFan215** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 1:41 am

What would DAL be willing to give up for Wallace?

Diop?
Terry?

Post #9 » by **VintaGe36** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 1:42 am

I'm gonna guess Dampier would be involved, simply for financial reasons.

Blazer77 · Post #10 » by **Blazer77** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 4:18 am

the Mavs just traded for Hassell.

the answer for the Lakeshow is to increase Turiaf and Odom's burn and to work in Brown and Mihm, but slowly.

Rand10 · Post #11 » by **Rand10** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 5:14 am

SportsFan215 wrote:What would DAL be willing to give up for Wallace?

Diop?
Terry?

I wouldn't give up anything for him to be honest

JD45 · Post #12 » by **JD45** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 6:55 am

I don't think the Mavs would give up Dampier for Ben Wallace. Big Ben is in a major decline.

And the Mavs would not like the original deal either. They need Diop. Dampier is best when he splits minutes.

dirkforpres · Post #13 » by **dirkforpres** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 5:40 pm

No way... Lakers are stuck with that trainwreck that is Radmanovich's contract, just like Dallas is stuck with Dampier's.

hermes · Post #14 » by **hermes** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 7:15 pm

mavs don't want radman
and mavs want to keep diop