wiz vs. celtics part dos game thread

[wermolwermol777]

I hate following everything belatedly since I'm usually at work when the game is on but...hooray!

Off topic, but sorry to once again not reply your e-mail on Saturday. I sometimes remember to keep Outlook open during the night, but it seems that whenever it matters I don't have it open :p.

Whenever I have a link, and I almost always do, I'm more than happy to share it . Just for future, if you're trying to catch my attention posting on this board or on the wizards blog or the chatroom here if I get on there (been having issues with it for some reason this year) might be a better idea, cause I have those open almost always during the games.

But meh...living out of the timezone sucks. I planned on going back to sleep for a couple of hours after the game, but I was so full of adrenalin that it really didn't work out so I am more or less like a zombie right now.

[Ruzious]

CCJ and friends, we were having this same discussion on the thread it was intended for http://www.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic. ... &start=216 where a wise man (or wiseguy) said:

Well, it is foolish to argue that the team is better without him - which is theoretically the premise of this thread. The numbers don't back it up, basic logic doesn't back it up, and people point to the record - but the Wiz have had a very favorable schedule, and Wiz players have improved. There's no question the Wiz would be better with him.

The thread would be useful if it were asking the question - Would the Wiz be contenders with Gil?

[dobrojim]

So how come it isn't when the Celts - preordained representatives of the East in the Finals and with the NBA version of a dominant record - get shellacked two in a row?

I loved the Ws. I love HOW they pulled them off. But I would
never ever characterize them as a shellacking. Nope. But that's
OK.

[bulletproof_32]

-= original quote snipped =-



WE should. Were you txting me on Friday?

Nah, dude. It wasn't me.