Orlando Contends, Milwaukee Rebuilds

ecuhus1981 · Post #1 » by **ecuhus1981** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 3:58 pm

Redd, Gadzuric, Bell and Villanueva for Battie, Arroyo, Garrity, Dooling, Cook, Redick, Augustine and a future 1st (Trade ID #4411185)

theTHIEF · Post #2 » by **theTHIEF** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 4:08 pm

I'd do it...

but realistically, if they are indeed having a fire sale, I'd like to try and get Simmons and CV from the Bucks for expirings, another piece maybe and a 1st...

TripleDouble · Post #3 » by **TripleDouble** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 4:16 pm

think Redd will eventually be traded...this is terrible for the Bucks!!! There isn't even one legit starter in that group, and the Bucks are giving away the two best players (possibly three) in the trade!!!!

EastSideBucksFan · Post #4 » by **EastSideBucksFan** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 5:01 pm

Keep dreaming

ecuhus1981 · Post #5 » by **ecuhus1981** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 6:21 pm

Well, I'm not a Magic fan; I just wanted to see if something would work. It is pretty bad for the Bucks, I agree.

deeney0 · Post #6 » by **deeney0** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:07 pm

The Magic is a good place for Redd to go; that being said, I doubt they have the assetts to pull it off. Even Redd+Gadz for Battie, Dooling, Arroyo, Garritty, and two 1sts doesn't look right to me.

MagicFan3 · Post #7 » by **MagicFan3** » Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:36 pm

TripleDouble wrote:think Redd will eventually be traded...this is terrible for the Bucks!!! There isn't even one legit starter in that group, and the Bucks are giving away the two best players (possibly three) in the trade!!!!

That's kind of the point... they'd be trading for contracts lasting no longer than two years.

TripleDouble · Post #8 » by **TripleDouble** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:15 am

MagicFan3 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

That's kind of the point... they'd be trading for contracts lasting no longer than two years.

lol, I understood that, but it is a bit far fetched to think that the Bucks should trade Redd and CV just to get 1 and 2 year deals. They do not need to completely blow up the team, just re-focus around Bogut and Yi.

cam2win · Post #9 » by **cam2win** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:56 am

I didn't eve bother with names as I first wonder when rosters were expanded to 18?

MagicFan3 · Post #10 » by **MagicFan3** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 3:19 am

TripleDouble wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

lol, I understood that, but it is a bit far fetched to think that the Bucks should trade Redd and CV just to get 1 and 2 year deals. They do not need to completely blow up the team, just re-focus around Bogut and Yi.

If they trade Redd, that would be the logical thing to do. Trade for expirings, then go after a big name FA.

bucksbrewerspackersfan · Post #11 » by **bucksbrewerspackersfan** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 6:24 am

Go after a big name FA this is Milwaukee we are talking about are last three big FA signings lets see were Ken Norman, Anthony Mason, and Bobby Simmons. We would trade for draft picks and a future..

TheRevTy · Post #12 » by **TheRevTy** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 6:56 am

Can Bell play PG, cause this trade leaves Orlando sans a back-up PG.

This just seems to be an awful lot of players moving. I would love Charlie V. and Redd on the Magic, and it seems Gadzuric's contract would have to be included to get it done... Maybe no Gadzuric and include Turkoglu?

Can Battie even be traded?

skones · Post #13 » by **skones** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 7:08 am

This is awful for Milwaukee.