Kings/Clippers

HarlemHeat37 · Post #1 » by **HarlemHeat37** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 5:52 am

where would the Kings and Clippers rank if they were healthy and playing in the Eastern Conference?..

PG Cassell/Livingston/Knight
SG Mobley/Ross
SF Maggette/Thornton/Powell
PF Brand/Thomas
C Kaman

PG Bibby/Udrih
SG Martin/Garcia
SF Artest/Salmons
PF Moore/SAR/Thomas
C Miller/Hawes

those look like pretty solid lineups to me..

Suns_Fever · Post #2 » by **Suns_Fever** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 6:04 am

Kings would rank in top 6th-8th while clippers would rank top 4-6th

Post #3 » by **KF10** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 6:22 am

Suns_Fever wrote:Kings would rank in top 6th-8th while clippers would rank top 4-6th

Kings could do better than the 6th seed in the east, especially when healthy IMO...

Illuminati · Post #4 » by **Illuminati** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 6:31 am

Kings are a top 3 team.

Post #5 » by **pillwenney** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 7:49 am

If healthy (and if when healthy, their guys mesh), I think the Kings could probably be 4th. I think being in the west this year, we would probably be at least very close to .500 if we had all of our guys. Being in the east would put us at least a few games over IMO.

Phobo_Phile · Post #6 » by **Phobo_Phile** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:03 pm

I think Clippers would be a lot better even in the West. They are just missing this one guy named Elton Brand. yeah, he's pretty good

skones · Post #7 » by **skones** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 1:03 pm

Illuminati wrote:Kings are a top 3 team.

Um no.

sackings916 · Post #8 » by **sackings916** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 1:31 pm

skones wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Um no.

Orlando is 3rd in the east and we have 5 more losses than them. If we were healthy and played in the east I dont think its that far off that we would have a similar record to the Magic.

Kings>>>Bucks BTW.

skones · Post #9 » by **skones** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 3:21 pm

sackings916 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Orlando is 3rd in the east and we have 5 more losses than them. If we were healthy and played in the east I dont think its that far off that we would have a similar record to the Magic.

Kings>>>Bucks BTW.

1. I read the question wrong, thinking it was the Western Conference.
2. The whole Kings >> Bucks thing is rather stupid. Its only purpose is to bate me into an argument which has no place in this thread. Congratulations on being a dick.
3. Boston, Detroit, and Orlando would still be better. Which means the Kings are probably 4.

hermes · Post #10 » by **hermes** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 3:26 pm

both would make the playoffs

AlexRapsFan · Post #11 » by **AlexRapsFan** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 5:41 pm

well i really like the kings team other than bibby at PG, but they would still do better than the raps are at the moment. somewhere from 8th to 3rd?

the clippers??? they're awsome, same problem at PG tho. i could see them being anywhere from 1st to 4th? livingston can be really good but he needs to add some strength badly.

just my opinion.

T.Duncan21 · Post #12 » by **T.Duncan21** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 7:10 pm

The Kings if healthy are still an average team at best. I love Salmons but I think they'd be 6-8 in the East and out of the playoffs in the West.

The Clippers on the other hand are a team that would make the playoffs in the West and be a notch below DET and BOS in the East. The Clippers next year assuming that Brand and Livingston come back healthy should be a scary team.

Joseph17 · Post #13 » by **Joseph17** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 7:23 pm

They would both probably be 4th or 3rd in the East. They are both extremely talented teams when they are healthy.