Redd Trades; a Baseline of Assumptions

[TheRevTy]

-= original quote snipped =-



For Redd no.

Welp, I suppose no sense carrying on in this futile excersize, then. Pleasure doing business with you.

[skones]

-= original quote snipped =-



Umm Dunleavy is averaging 17/6/3 this year. He may have an extra year on his deal but he's actually producing, unlike Simmons.

I realize this. But we take on Murphy, who has a worse deal than Simmons. Redd is also on the way out as well.

As for the Granger deal, I came up with almost the exact same thing quite some time ago. I was on board with that move, and still am.

[Whiteman]

Redd, Charlie

for

Hedo
Keyon Dooling, Pat Garrity, Keith Bogans (Expirings)
1st rounder

Yes, no?

Yes.

This helps the Bucks cap situation a lot (which is always good). Furthermore, I think the Bucks would be a more balanced team with Hedo - less arguing about ball movement and stat whoring.

[1377]

I say NO.

I like Hedo, but he is not worth Redd. A very late 1rst doesnt really help us either. We need a good 3, but if we trade CV and Redd for just Hedo, we are very weak at the 2 then.

I, for one, do not want to see an Ivey - Mo backcourt for longer then we need to. If we get an absolute stud at 3, I don't mind playing Mason at 2.

[rsavaj]

Probably a package based around Barbosa/Diaw/ATL pick...Banks would have to be included to make the salaries work.