may191988 wrote:i was just thinking of this cause last night on fox sports radio nick saban (sp?) who is a d.c. guy mentioned are the wiz better w/out gil?? personally i think they are cause offense isnt the problem its defense and gil doesnt do much to help that. so i thought what teams would want him in case of a s&t this summer. i think the 3 best candidates are cleveland, atlanta, and ny.
i just could not foresee any package from cleveland that would be good enough.
atlanta i thought of josh smith but he plays the same position as jamison and i hope he sticks around and also always hard to make blockbuster trades within the division.
so i ultimately saw ny as the best possible trading partner. gil for lee, nate, randolph morris, and balkman.
a trade like that would strengthen depth big time with young talent and also increase defense.
We are NOT better without Gil... thats a rediculous statement. Sure we beat Boston twice but Gil completes our team... we definitely have a big whole in the lineup with no Gil. That Knicks trade is one of the most absurd things Ive ever seen...