Jamaal Magloire anybody?

WCDYNASTY · Post #1 » by **WCDYNASTY** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 10:39 pm

Valuable Trading Chip?

League sources said that Jamaal Magloire has not asked to be traded.

His one-year, $4 million contract, however, could be a valuable trading chip, especially since the Nets are closer to getting back Nenad Krstic.

Bergen Record

WCDYNASTY · Post #2 » by **WCDYNASTY** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 10:43 pm

The only problem is who do the Lakers trade. Walton can be traded who has the same contract but Im sure the Nets wouldnt want the years left, not sure Id want to see him go anyways. The Lakers could trade Mihm and Vujacic for Magloire, yes it works in the trade checker as well. I think this would be a good trade to get a real starting center who was a former all-star and is in the last year of his contract.

SashAlex · Post #3 » by **SashAlex** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 10:49 pm

He's a nice player if healthy and ready 100 % !

I'd throw Kwame, but his contract is big ! Mihm and someone, but not Sasha. )))

incontrol__ · Post #4 » by **incontrol__** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 10:55 pm

Magloire seems to be pretty much done..

WCDYNASTY · Post #5 » by **WCDYNASTY** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 10:56 pm

SashAlex wrote:He's a nice player if healthy and ready 100 % !

I'd throw Kwame, but his contract is big ! Mihm and someone, but not Sasha. )))

Yeah Kwame contract is too big plus he is a good trade chip for the Lakers as he is in the last year of his contract with a value of a little over $9M.

WCDYNASTY · Post #6 » by **WCDYNASTY** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 10:58 pm

incontrol__ wrote:Magloire's seems to be pretty much done..

Hey Im sure he wont play any worse than Kwame :rofl:

CITYOFANGELSX3 · Post #7 » by **CITYOFANGELSX3** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 10:58 pm

If he's done like Incontrol says so. We might be able to get him for cheap!

incontrol__ · Post #8 » by **incontrol__** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 11:06 pm

You'd be surprised.

2 ppg, 3.7 rpg, 31.1% from the field and 45.2% FT line.

WCDYNASTY · Post #9 » by **WCDYNASTY** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 11:10 pm

incontrol__ wrote:You'd be surprised.

2 ppg, 3.7 rpg, 31.1% from the field and 45.2% FT line.

Fresh new start could help :dontknow:

incontrol__ · Post #10 » by **incontrol__** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 11:17 pm

Of course.

I wouldn't give up Vujacic and Mihm for him though, and that's pretty much the only way we could get him (without giving up something like Kwame).

hermes · Post #11 » by **hermes** » Wed Jan 16, 2008 11:23 pm

if we aren't giving up mihm and sasha(who i'd want to keep for comedy reasons) then it would be pointless to try and get him

ak777 · Post #12 » by **ak777** » Thu Jan 17, 2008 12:32 am

why we need a player who is not getting any minutes for the nets???? He is unable to get minutes ahead of J Collins and thats pretty pathetic if you ask me

trippy · Post #13 » by **trippy** » Thu Jan 17, 2008 1:31 am

Someone please tell me atleast one game that Luke Walton has made a positive difference.

Da big3 · Post #14 » by **Da big3** » Thu Jan 17, 2008 2:53 am

incontrol__ wrote:Magloire seems to be pretty much done..

Magloire is in Franks dog house what are u guys offering us

Post #15 » by **dockingsched** » Thu Jan 17, 2008 3:13 am

nothing. magz is even worse than chris mihm.

gmurray8 · Post #16 » by **gmurray8** » Thu Jan 17, 2008 5:57 pm

What about IKE DIOGU? He can hit the mid-range J and Indiana isn't playing him. He has some potential still.

Post #17 » by **Slava** » Thu Jan 17, 2008 10:48 pm

I'd rather look to get Jeff Foster from Indiana to hold up the C spot until Bynum returns.

Lost Angel · Post #18 » by **Lost Angel** » Thu Jan 17, 2008 10:56 pm

yeah Foster is nice. but how do we get him? he has positive value for them.

Post #19 » by **Slava** » Thu Jan 17, 2008 11:04 pm

May be take way one of their bad contracts with him or else I wouldn't even mind David Harrison if he can keep away from pot for 8 weeks. :lol: