Would Shaq be GOAT if...

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

Deus
Veteran
Posts: 2,735
And1: 149
Joined: Jul 22, 2004
       

Re: Would Shaq be GOAT if... 

Post#21 » by Deus » Wed Jan 16, 2008 7:29 pm

many fans consider Shaq the GOAT anyway

i think he's the GOHG, but not the GOAT
User avatar
Kobay
General Manager
Posts: 9,404
And1: 5
Joined: May 01, 2007

 

Post#22 » by Kobay » Wed Jan 16, 2008 7:37 pm

Craig McDermott
Banned User
Posts: 1,527
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 20, 2007

Re: Would Shaq be GOAT if... 

Post#23 » by Craig McDermott » Wed Jan 16, 2008 8:21 pm

Alyosha12 wrote:If he could have hit his FTs in his prime in a normal rate, lets say in the lower 80%?

I mean he would have been absolutely unstoppable, as hack a shaq wouldnt work? Plus he would have had at least 5 PPG more, he could play the final minutes of close games etc...

So would Shaq have been GOAT or at elast the greatest big to play the game if he had a FT shot?


Conditioning and taking the reg season seriously are what kept him from GOAT considerations, not his FT shooting. Iverson and Duncan wouldn't have won MVPs in 01 and 02 if not for that. Shaq wouldn't have had gout if not for that. Shaq wouldn't have come into camp fat during his prime if not for that. Shaq wouldn't have waited til training camp for surgery if not for that.
LiquidFire
Banned User
Posts: 3,275
And1: 3
Joined: May 03, 2007

 

Post#24 » by LiquidFire » Wed Jan 16, 2008 8:25 pm

After miami won the ship, he PROMISED the city that he would bring back another ring, and he garenteed it.
User avatar
hermes
RealGM
Posts: 97,155
And1: 25,719
Joined: Aug 27, 2007
Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
 

 

Post#25 » by hermes » Wed Jan 16, 2008 9:07 pm

maybe he'd be GOAT if he didn't need help winning his titles(kobe and wade) :wink:
UGA Hayes
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,856
And1: 20,623
Joined: Jan 05, 2004
Location: real gm

 

Post#26 » by UGA Hayes » Wed Jan 16, 2008 9:28 pm

Shaq is always going to be penalized for his work ethic. His productivity is probably better than people realize, but its hard for people (including me) to overlook that he pretty much accomplished what he did due to sheer size and not any attempt to become more skilled as a player. You lose a lot of respect as a player when you don't work hard, regardless of what you accomplish.
User avatar
RJM
General Manager
Posts: 9,609
And1: 2,266
Joined: Oct 16, 2007
Location: Paris, France
Contact:
     

 

Post#27 » by RJM » Wed Jan 16, 2008 10:28 pm

Shaq would have been the GOAT if he...

-Had the work ethic of a Karl Malone/Michael Jordan.

-Hit at least 75% of his FTs.

-Had a better attitude towards game play and player personnel.

-Made a dedicated effort to improve his game offseason after offseason.

-Didn't let his ego get in the way of success.

-Dedicated himself more on the defensive end.

-Had some kind of midrange game from at least 12-15 feet that could be used.
User avatar
tnugget
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,337
And1: 206
Joined: Mar 01, 2007

 

Post#28 » by tnugget » Thu Jan 17, 2008 12:16 am

How the hell is shaq lazy?

"When the heat is on, PAIN IS GONE"
User avatar
RJM
General Manager
Posts: 9,609
And1: 2,266
Joined: Oct 16, 2007
Location: Paris, France
Contact:
     

 

Post#29 » by RJM » Thu Jan 17, 2008 1:50 am

Then why is he always injured? That **** is just for endorsement money.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,574
And1: 10,038
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Re: Would Shaq be GOAT if... 

Post#30 » by penbeast0 » Thu Jan 17, 2008 3:01 am

Craig McDermott wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Conditioning and taking the reg season seriously are what kept him from GOAT considerations, not his FT shooting. Iverson and Duncan wouldn't have won MVPs in 01 and 02 if not for that. Shaq wouldn't have had gout if not for that. Shaq wouldn't have come into camp fat during his prime if not for that. Shaq wouldn't have waited til training camp for surgery if not for that.


No, not winning titles consistently year in and year out are what keeps him from being considered GOAT. In terms of pure talent and statistical dominance, Wilt will always be the number one guy until someone comes along that consistently produces half again what anyone else in the league is producing or better.

But, in terms of winning, the GOAT has to go to either Russell or MJ, both of whom dominated the title chase for a substantial period of years (Russell 11 of 13, MJ 6 of 6 though he wasn't able to get his team over the top in the early part of his career and took two years off during his run) . . . neither Shaq not anyone else has approached that level of domination since the clock changed basketball. If Shaq had 10 rings with exactly the same stats and weaknesses he has had, he'd be the GOAT.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
tsherkin
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 93,199
And1: 32,650
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

 

Post#31 » by tsherkin » Thu Jan 17, 2008 3:16 am

Just FWIW, if Shaq had hit just 70% from the line on his career, he would have scored another 1,789 points and raised his career scoring average by 1.79 ppg.

In his best year at the line, he drew 13.1 FTA/g (00-01); if he'd hit 70% then, he'd have scored an extra 2.5 ppg and averaged about 31.2 ppg.

But that still wouldn't have made him the GOAT; Shaq was never sufficiently committed to defense and rebounding to be that and his ego routinely got in the way of his interactions with his second stars until he recognized that he was on the decline.

He never had the attitude to be the GOAT.
bringinhinkie
General Manager
Posts: 9,786
And1: 930
Joined: Apr 01, 2006
Location: knicks
 

 

Post#32 » by bringinhinkie » Thu Jan 17, 2008 3:33 am

lol at the shaq being the goat if he hit his fts n had a better attitude.. only shot this guy has a GOAT is if barry bonds juices him up and he averages 35 and 15 the next 3 years and wins a threepeat
User avatar
basketball royalty
RealGM
Posts: 17,087
And1: 2,968
Joined: Dec 10, 2004
Location: jurassic park

 

Post#33 » by basketball royalty » Thu Jan 17, 2008 4:01 am

tsherkin wrote:Just FWIW, if Shaq had hit just 70% from the line on his career, he would have scored another 1,789 points and raised his career scoring average by 1.79 ppg.

In his best year at the line, he drew 13.1 FTA/g (00-01); if he'd hit 70% then, he'd have scored an extra 2.5 ppg and averaged about 31.2 ppg.

But that still wouldn't have made him the GOAT; Shaq was never sufficiently committed to defense and rebounding to be that and his ego routinely got in the way of his interactions with his second stars until he recognized that he was on the decline.

He never had the attitude to be the GOAT.




This part made me think of Wilt Chamberlain, or atleast my perception of him as I was too young to see him play.

Shaq won 4 rings and I would side with him when it came to his problems with Penny and Kobe, but I agree that his defense and rebounding could have been alot better, aswell as his drive in the regular season which was too often set to cruise control.
Image
props to Turbozone for the sig
User avatar
EHL
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,312
And1: 2
Joined: Nov 05, 2003

 

Post#34 » by EHL » Thu Jan 17, 2008 4:10 am

tkb wrote:If Shaq had the work ethic of someone like Karl Malone, Michael Jordan or Kobe Bryant he would be considered as the GOAT right now IMO.


Pretty much. /thread.
RockTHECasbah
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,526
And1: 10
Joined: Oct 05, 2007

 

Post#35 » by RockTHECasbah » Thu Jan 17, 2008 4:22 am

HOW MANY SHATS???????
Know anyone who is disabled? has an addiction?
Image
HandyTax - Your Canadian Disability Tax Credit Consultants
http://www.handytax.ca
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 53,865
And1: 22,804
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: Would Shaq be GOAT if... 

Post#36 » by Doctor MJ » Thu Jan 17, 2008 4:24 am

Alyosha12 wrote:If he could have hit his FTs in his prime in a normal rate, lets say in the lower 80%?

I mean he would have been absolutely unstoppable, as hack a shaq wouldnt work? Plus he would have had at least 5 PPG more, he could play the final minutes of close games etc...

So would Shaq have been GOAT or at elast the greatest big to play the game if he had a FT shot?


That might have made him have the GOAT peak, but it does nothing about Shaq not living up to his potential due to being out of shape when considering GOAT career.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
Jordan23Forever
General Manager
Posts: 8,261
And1: 54
Joined: Apr 25, 2005

Re: Would Shaq be GOAT if... 

Post#37 » by Jordan23Forever » Thu Jan 17, 2008 4:28 am

Alyosha12 wrote:If he could have hit his FTs in his prime in a normal rate, lets say in the lower 80%?

I mean he would have been absolutely unstoppable, as hack a shaq wouldnt work? Plus he would have had at least 5 PPG more, he could play the final minutes of close games etc...

So would Shaq have been GOAT or at elast the greatest big to play the game if he had a FT shot?


If he did this and made a better effort on defense and his conditioning, he'd probably be the GOAT without question, since he'd have 5-7 33 pt/15 reb/3.5 blk/58% FG seasons and at least 4 rings.
User avatar
EHL
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,312
And1: 2
Joined: Nov 05, 2003

 

Post#38 » by EHL » Thu Jan 17, 2008 5:08 am

^ He'd have 6 rings minimum. 99-00 to 03-04 is 5 straight, plus one in Miami in 05-06. If he hadn't left the Lakers, 7 rings or more.
bringinhinkie
General Manager
Posts: 9,786
And1: 930
Joined: Apr 01, 2006
Location: knicks
 

 

Post#39 » by bringinhinkie » Thu Jan 17, 2008 5:11 am

EHL wrote:^ He'd have 6 rings minimum. 99-00 to 03-04 is 5 straight, plus one in Miami in 05-06. If he hadn't left the Lakers, 7 rings or more.


uhh did tim duncan and the spurs all the sudden suck? and shaq was on the lakers in 03-04, they LOST in the finals to detroit.. ???
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 53,865
And1: 22,804
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

 

Post#40 » by Doctor MJ » Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:05 am

KnicksMetsJetsNova wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



uhh did tim duncan and the spurs all the sudden suck? and shaq was on the lakers in 03-04, they LOST in the finals to detroit.. ???


I think you're confused on multiple levels.

Duncan's Spurs have never been at peak Shaq-Kobe Lakers level.

'03-04 Shaq was obviously a far different animal than the hypothetical guy we're talking about who wasn't obese.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!

Return to The General Board