If the Suns somehow landed 'Sheed...

Moderators: bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, ken6199, Domejandro

Liqourish
RealGM
Posts: 14,912
And1: 2,245
Joined: Oct 03, 2005
       

 

Post#21 » by Liqourish » Thu Jan 17, 2008 7:41 pm

joe.linnen wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Rasheed already said that he doesn't like playing Center and he stated that while playing for the Pistons.


Sheed has been the starting center all season and played mostly center last season. He doesn't like playing Center cause he likes to stretch the opposing defenses, but he can and does play Center.

On Phoenix, Sheed most definitely would be the Center. He'd by the only post defender they would have and he is the best defender on guys like Duncan and Garnett. He takes it as a challenge.

Phoenix would be instant favorites to win it all. However, Steve Kerr wanted Sheed, Tay and multiple 1st just for Marion. No chance in hell he'd get Sheed with his dilusional(sp?) asking prices.

Sheed will be a large expiring after next season, Dumars would want a legit center back in return.
conleyorbust
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,837
And1: 0
Joined: May 24, 2007

 

Post#22 » by conleyorbust » Thu Jan 17, 2008 7:51 pm

If you add a good player to a good team for nothing, you can make a lot of teams good. If Nash went to Atlanta, they'd be badass. If Redd went to Orlando. Etc.

If PHX traded Sheed for Marion straight up they get worse no question. Marion is a much better rebounder, which that team needs. He is also the one of the best transition scorers in the league and he is the second most important fast break player on that team.
User avatar
Rooster
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,140
And1: 11
Joined: Aug 26, 2005
Location: Frozen Wasteland

 

Post#23 » by Rooster » Thu Jan 17, 2008 8:01 pm

A few thoughts:

1. As mentioned, of course adding random stars to contenders makes them look really good.

2. To whoever said Marion would be out of position, not at all! For the first time in about three years, he'd finally be back in position.

3. Regarding Detroit Marion packages, if I'm Detroit, I don't even want him.

4. Adding Redd to Orlando would give that team one of the worst cap situations in league history.
Schadenfreude wrote:Not going to lie, if I found out that one of the seemingly illiterate morons we'd banned on the Raptors board was Primoz Brezec, it'd pretty much make my decade.
Liqourish
RealGM
Posts: 14,912
And1: 2,245
Joined: Oct 03, 2005
       

 

Post#24 » by Liqourish » Thu Jan 17, 2008 8:07 pm

If DET traded Sheed for Marion straight up they get worse no question.


Fixed. Trading away our only post defender and only center really for a forward tweener, no matter how good of a rebounder he is, doesn't help the Pistons one bit.

Regarding Detroit Marion packages, if I'm Detroit, I don't even want him.


Marions not a bad player, but he's more valuable to the Suns than to the Pistons and the Suns want players in return that gut the Pistons frontcourt. I better option would be Amare. A PF/C for another PF/C. add in filler on both sides to mesh it out.
conleyorbust
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,837
And1: 0
Joined: May 24, 2007

 

Post#25 » by conleyorbust » Thu Jan 17, 2008 8:12 pm

Liqourish wrote:
If DET traded Sheed for Marion straight up they get worse no question.


Fixed. Trading away our only post defender and only center really for a forward tweener, no matter how good of a rebounder he is, doesn't help the Pistons one bit.



Might be true but this thread isn't about Detroit. I guess you are saying Detroit doesn't do that deal.
Ballings7
RealGM
Posts: 24,068
And1: 1,940
Joined: Jan 04, 2006

 

Post#26 » by Ballings7 » Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:17 pm

No, Joe Dumars would not trade Rasheed for Marion, and have Marion playing at PF on his team. I think he knows that wouldn't and doesn't work (only does to a certain amount). Especially with Detroit not being a running team.

Detroit instantly becomes less of a team if that trade happens, and their window as a contender isn't that close to being closed yet.

It's just pointless for Detroit to do.
The Playoffs don't care about your Analytics
User avatar
rsavaj
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,863
And1: 2,767
Joined: May 09, 2007
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

 

Post#27 » by rsavaj » Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:19 pm

Liqourish wrote:
If DET traded Sheed for Marion straight up they get worse no question.


Fixed. Trading away our only post defender and only center really for a forward tweener, no matter how good of a rebounder he is, doesn't help the Pistons one bit.

Regarding Detroit Marion packages, if I'm Detroit, I don't even want him.


Marions not a bad player, but he's more valuable to the Suns than to the Pistons and the Suns want players in return that gut the Pistons frontcourt. I better option would be Amare. A PF/C for another PF/C. add in filler on both sides to mesh it out.


DET wouldn't trade 'Sheed for Marion, but there's no way PHX gives up Amare in a 'Sheed deal, so I don't see any trade working out.
Ballings7
RealGM
Posts: 24,068
And1: 1,940
Joined: Jan 04, 2006

 

Post#28 » by Ballings7 » Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:24 pm

Rooster wrote:2. To whoever said Marion would be out of position, not at all! For the first time in about three years, he'd finally be back in position.


Exactly. Marion's only been playing PF because of D'Antoni going smaller for the speed 'ball (offense!). Also relating to Amare at center - he's not a center.
The Playoffs don't care about your Analytics
User avatar
Rooster
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 25,140
And1: 11
Joined: Aug 26, 2005
Location: Frozen Wasteland

 

Post#29 » by Rooster » Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:32 am

I think Amare's more of a centre than Marion is a PF simply because his size permits it more (6'10" 255 or so for a C is tons better than 6'7" 230 or so for a PF) and when you look at where Amare's offence comes from, he doesn't have that tendency to go to the 15-footer so much as just cram it. Ideally, my PF is probably in that Brown/Grant mold where he's playing shutdown D and knocking down smart shots while my C is the one constantly at the rack.

Hell, when Marion's at SF, Diaw's at PF and Amare's at C, that kinda works.
Schadenfreude wrote:Not going to lie, if I found out that one of the seemingly illiterate morons we'd banned on the Raptors board was Primoz Brezec, it'd pretty much make my decade.
User avatar
Sub-Zero
Sophomore
Posts: 213
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 02, 2007
Location: Sheed's bodyguard

 

Post#30 » by Sub-Zero » Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:47 am

what the hell are Pistons gonna trade sheed for, a bag of peanuts. Maybe I should start threads titled "if the pistons got nash, stoudamire, marion, barbosa somehow" for nothing at all.
Image
User avatar
leevii
Rookie
Posts: 1,176
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 14, 2005

 

Post#31 » by leevii » Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:40 am

if the Pistons somehow landed 02/03 version of Ben Wallace... he'd be perfect for them! PERFECT!
AnSweR07 wrote:I'll go Roy, slightly ahead of Wade.
yunggunz
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,098
And1: 1
Joined: Sep 21, 2005

 

Post#32 » by yunggunz » Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:47 am

KnicksH20 wrote:Stoudemire
Sheed
Marion
Hill
Nash

Maybe. But Hill and Marion would be playing out of position, and you can't bring Hill off the bench, so it might be clustered.




Marion is a 3 playing out of position at the 4.
User avatar
Point forward
Head Coach
Posts: 6,200
And1: 285
Joined: May 16, 2007
Location: Eating crow for the rest of my life :D

 

Post#33 » by Point forward » Fri Jan 18, 2008 9:22 am

I think a lineup of TD / Sheed / Bowen / Gino / TP could hold teams to under 70 points per game.
Ballings7
RealGM
Posts: 24,068
And1: 1,940
Joined: Jan 04, 2006

 

Post#34 » by Ballings7 » Fri Jan 18, 2008 10:32 am

Rooster wrote:I think Amare's more of a centre than Marion is a PF simply because his size permits it more (6'10" 255 or so for a C is tons better than 6'7" 230 or so for a PF)


Well, that's only natural because of their size, generally being able to play at the next position up at certain times. But as it's been, that doesn't mean they are where they should be for their primary spots.

Also, I actually haven't known of at all Amare's 255, and doesn't appear that way. I've always known of his weight being from 235-245. I think I read Amare said himself he's around 235, recently. And I know Doug Collins did lately, on the Utah game last week. The talk about his weight spurred from when Amare got beat pretty well on a post-up spin to the basket dunk by Okur. A similar offensive move was done against him from Kwame Brown in G3 of the playoffs last year, too.

NBA.com: 249

Yahoo: 245

ESPN: 245

SI: 245

CBS: 249

BBRef.: 245

FoxSports: 245

Rooster wrote:he doesn't have that tendency to go to the 15-footer so much as just cram it. Ideally, my PF is probably in that Brown/Grant mold where he's playing shutdown D and knocking down smart shots while my C is the one constantly at the rack.


Actually Amare takes numerous jumpshots from different places on the floor, and is more of a slasher, face-up guy. Not more jumpshots than the stuff to the basket, but still a bunch of jumpshots per game. He's not constantly at the basket. Actually worked on adding the 3PTer to his game more this summer. Not in the way of taking them like a wing-player does, but attempting more than he has in the past. Which is what's been going on.

Jumpshot stats: 51% att., 44% (.437) eFG%, 64% ast'd, 6.4 ppg

Inside: 49% att., eFG% 73%, 75% ast'd, 10.2 ppg

http://www.82games.com/0708/07PHO13A.HTM

He's too small mass/strength-wise, and not nearly enough defensively, playing center. The latter I'd guess would go similarily at PF, just because he's not a solid defender. On a more traditional team, he's playing PF, and he played PF primarily before 04-05. D'Antoni went to Amare before the season in 04, and insisted he play center so the team can play smaller and at the pace he wanted. I heard a few times on how the Suns were set-up originally, that Amare may of not been right on board with playing center. But D'Antoni convinced him.

(82games.com)
03-04: 30% of minutes at PF, 19 at C.

02-03: 52% of mintues at PF, 11 at C.

No one as a big man for a PF, like you described on Phoenix, though. So far, they don't want to commit significantly to somebody like that. Which is because of the reliance and bias to speed and skill offensively. Even with Kurt Thomas they didn't most of his time there. 26.4 MPG in 05-06, with no Amare, 18 MPG in 06-07 with Amare. His age was probably a factor, but Thomas changing the offense's ability and the tempo was the main factor. Then of course his larger contract which they didn't ultimately like.
The Playoffs don't care about your Analytics
7r5ur
RealGM
Posts: 11,949
And1: 5,080
Joined: Feb 26, 2005

 

Post#35 » by 7r5ur » Fri Jan 18, 2008 11:04 am

Point forward wrote:I think a lineup of TD / Sheed / Bowen / Gino / TP could hold teams to under 70 points per game.


You really think that team is better defensively than Billups / Rip / Prince / Sheed / Ben (all in their prime) under Larry Brown?

Defensively..

Billups > Parker
Rip = Ginobili
Prince < Bowen (though I would say Bowen has regressed a bit defensively)
04 Sheed > 08 Sheed
04 Ben > 08 Duncan


... As for the Suns magically acquiring Sheed without giving up anything.... What's the point? The only player on the Suns that the Pistons would consider trading him for on that team is Amare. That might close the Pistons current window (our Defense would fall apart), though Amare being pretty young still, Joe would probably be tempted.
Ballings7
RealGM
Posts: 24,068
And1: 1,940
Joined: Jan 04, 2006

 

Post#36 » by Ballings7 » Fri Jan 18, 2008 11:09 am

Not really saying what group would be better, but just to stay, it'll probably be different defensively for Duncan and Bowen later in the season, and in the playoffs. The energy and focus is usually put up a notch then.
The Playoffs don't care about your Analytics
User avatar
thamadkant
Suns Forum Picker of Cherries
Posts: 16,916
And1: 8,598
Joined: Jan 06, 2007
 

 

Post#37 » by thamadkant » Fri Jan 18, 2008 6:33 pm

Rasheed's skills and abilities is perfect for the Suns...

So yes he would make them favourites. But thats assuming he is added and not traded for any players.


A realistic trade would be:

Stoudemire + Barbosa + ATL Pick

for

Wallace + Hamilton




Pistons then sign Webber again.

C: Webber
PF: Stoudemire
SF: Prince
SG: Barbosa
PG: Billups
McDyess/Hayes/Maxiell off the bench

Suns get

C: Wallace
PF: Marion
SF: Hill
SG: Hamilton
PG: Nash
Diaw/Bell/Banks off the bench
User avatar
rsavaj
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,863
And1: 2,767
Joined: May 09, 2007
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

 

Post#38 » by rsavaj » Fri Jan 18, 2008 7:20 pm

thamadkant wrote:Rasheed's skills and abilities is perfect for the Suns...

So yes he would make them favourites. But thats assuming he is added and not traded for any players.


A realistic trade would be:

Stoudemire + Barbosa + ATL Pick

for

Wallace + Hamilton




Pistons then sign Webber again.

C: Webber
PF: Stoudemire
SF: Prince
SG: Barbosa
PG: Billups
McDyess/Hayes/Maxiell off the bench

Suns get

C: Wallace
PF: Marion
SF: Hill
SG: Hamilton
PG: Nash
Diaw/Bell/Banks off the bench


They would take Stoudemire over 'Sheed any day, and Rip isn't worth Barbosa and the ATL pick, IMO.
RTM
RealGM
Posts: 11,391
And1: 173
Joined: Apr 25, 2005

 

Post#39 » by RTM » Fri Jan 18, 2008 7:39 pm

You realize if a Sheed to PHX deal were to happen, it wouldn't be for Marion.

I would expect it to be Sheed and either Amir Johnson or Walter Hermann or Maxiell for Amare.

If the Pistons traded Sheed for Amare, they should try to keep Maxiell, because Amare is a revolving door on defense. I think the Pistons would also like to keep Amir over Hermann, but I don't know if the Suns would sign off.

Rosters would look like this:

Sheed/Skinner
Marion/One of Amir, Hermann, Maxiell
Hill/Diaw
Bell/Barbosa
Nash/Banks

Amare/Webber (would be signed to fill the last roster spot)
McDyess/One of Maxiell, Hermann, Amir
Prince/Hayes
Rip/Afflalo
Billups/Stuckey

I actually think any deal where Sheed leaves the Pistons could make them worse (especially defensively). But if, lets say, a Sheed/Amir for Amare deal were on the table, both sides would definitely consider it.
User avatar
Basileus777
General Manager
Posts: 7,818
And1: 2,048
Joined: Jul 13, 2007
Location: New Jersey
 

 

Post#40 » by Basileus777 » Fri Jan 18, 2008 8:40 pm

thamadkant wrote:Rasheed's skills and abilities is perfect for the Suns...

So yes he would make them favourites. But thats assuming he is added and not traded for any players.


A realistic trade would be:

Stoudemire + Barbosa + ATL Pick

for

Wallace + Hamilton




Pistons then sign Webber again.

C: Webber
PF: Stoudemire
SF: Prince
SG: Barbosa
PG: Billups
McDyess/Hayes/Maxiell off the bench

Suns get

C: Wallace
PF: Marion
SF: Hill
SG: Hamilton
PG: Nash
Diaw/Bell/Banks off the bench


An Amare/Webber frontcourt? :o

The Pistons' defense would be god awful. I think that trade actually makes both teams worse off.

Return to The General Board