ImageImageImageImageImage

OT - Is San Antonio Still the Team to Beat?

Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford

User avatar
kmatrixg
Veteran
Posts: 2,801
And1: 118
Joined: Jul 20, 2007
Location: Geographically: Northern Hemisphere; Socially: On the margins; Narratively: A long way to go

OT - Is San Antonio Still the Team to Beat? 

Post#1 » by kmatrixg » Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:09 pm

Watching last nights contest between the Cavs and Spurs, I noticed that the Spurs are in a very unique situation. Aside from playing great with the players they have on the floor - they have noone on the bench that can come in after these guys retire. Do you guys think it's about time for the Spurs to start bringing in some young talent?

Obviously, they are thinking the opposite, and yes, they do have great management which will lead them in the right direction - but each one of their players seems to be getting hurt. Duncan missed time due to the knee injury, Parker is now ailing with his foot - and Ginobili had the hand injury. Not to mention Barry just returned, who is arguably the 2nd best player off the bench.

Other than these guys - Duncan, Parker, Ginobili, Barry and Finley - they have mediocre/limited talent at each position. Is it time we see the Spurs start to decline? They have lost 12 games, most of which have been uncharacteristic losses too. The team really is starting to look old, and banged up - a step too slow. I truly believe this might be their last year of the dynasty before things start slipping - unless they make a move to get some young players.

Edit - forgot the OT
The Notic
Banned User
Posts: 8,001
And1: 8
Joined: Jun 10, 2006
Location: it's a bird. it's a plane. NO! it's Lois Lane givin me brain.

 

Post#2 » by The Notic » Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:17 pm

I remember around this time last year, people were saying the same thing about the Spurs ie. Old, Slow, Hurt and basically that their dynasty was coming to a definite end in the near future.

I still think they can be title contenders for the next 3-4 years. It's just really hard to play over 100 games a year and retain the mental, physical focus necassary to retain an extremely high level of play.

They'll be ready by April.
Silk Wilkes
Banned User
Posts: 10,533
And1: 10
Joined: Aug 28, 2004
Location: In between a pimp and a hard place

 

Post#3 » by Silk Wilkes » Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:20 pm

Until the Champs are dethroned the trophy is theirs.
The Notic
Banned User
Posts: 8,001
And1: 8
Joined: Jun 10, 2006
Location: it's a bird. it's a plane. NO! it's Lois Lane givin me brain.

 

Post#4 » by The Notic » Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:21 pm

Youngblood wrote:Until the Champs are dethroned the trophy is theirs.


:-?
Joker
RealGM
Posts: 17,846
And1: 7,276
Joined: Feb 05, 2003

 

Post#5 » by Joker » Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:23 pm

If the Spurs aren't the team to beat, then who is?
User avatar
kmatrixg
Veteran
Posts: 2,801
And1: 118
Joined: Jul 20, 2007
Location: Geographically: Northern Hemisphere; Socially: On the margins; Narratively: A long way to go

 

Post#6 » by kmatrixg » Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:23 pm

The Notic wrote:I remember around this time last year, people were saying the same thing about the Spurs ie. Old, Slow, Hurt and basically that their dynasty was coming to a definite end in the near future.

I still think they can be title contenders for the next 3-4 years. It's just really hard to play over 100 games a year and retain the mental, physical focus necassary to retain an extremely high level of play.

They'll be ready by April.


Very True - However, when I was watching Duncan last night - he seemed extremely frustrated. He used to be able to go into a game - lax and all - and simply take over the game by sheer physical play. But last night, it just looked like the game was getting into his head.

And yes, it is remarkable that these guys play over 100 games a season, plus during the summer - but while it's amazing, it could also be viewed as rash, given Duncans age.
User avatar
kmatrixg
Veteran
Posts: 2,801
And1: 118
Joined: Jul 20, 2007
Location: Geographically: Northern Hemisphere; Socially: On the margins; Narratively: A long way to go

 

Post#7 » by kmatrixg » Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:26 pm

Joker wrote:If the Spurs aren't the team to beat, then who is?


Thats really what I wanted to discuss, indirectly. Honestly, there is no one in the West without a weakness. We proved, along with the Cavs (which was a fluke win) that bench play, and a consistent 48 minutes of hustly can beat the Spurs, who play to break you down, and then take advantage when you're tired. Last night when LeBron sat - the Cavs went on a streak. The Spurs had some fight in them towards the end, but it was too much because James was back on the floor by then.
Vik Rude
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,968
And1: 1
Joined: Nov 08, 2005
Location: Brampton & Montreal
Contact:

 

Post#8 » by Vik Rude » Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:26 pm

Boston is the team to beat in the East. Phoenix is the team to beat in the west thus far. Spurs have had players struggling a lot and it is showing by them losing numerous games including some on their home court which is a very rare sighting.
Image
User avatar
kmatrixg
Veteran
Posts: 2,801
And1: 118
Joined: Jul 20, 2007
Location: Geographically: Northern Hemisphere; Socially: On the margins; Narratively: A long way to go

 

Post#9 » by kmatrixg » Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:28 pm

VCitay wrote:Boston is the team to beat in the East. Phoenix is the team to beat in the west thus far. Spurs have had players struggling a lot and it is showing by them losing numerous games including some on their home court which is a very rare sighting.


The Suns could be the team to beat, because they have the most complete lineup since they starting winning. Grant Hill is still a huge threat - but do they have the bench experience to take it all? The Lakers still have huge issues - Kobe isn't going to be able to carry the team for the full 8 weeks Bynum is out, so other than those 2 players, plus Odom - who else?
User avatar
s_cape
Sophomore
Posts: 119
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 16, 2006

 

Post#10 » by s_cape » Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:30 pm

Another interesting stat that they brought up last night as well was that over the 5 or 6 games, they have had really long scoring droughts, ranging from 5-12 minutes in length.

Having not seen those games, it may come back to what matrixg was saying about their lack of decent talent outside of Duncan, Parker, Ginobili, Barry, and Finley.

Regardless the reasons, it is an interesting stat.
'It's a tough place to live.'

'Yeah, their state emblem is a chalk outline.'
The_Hater
GHOAT (Greatest Hater Of All Time)
Posts: 85,319
And1: 40,062
Joined: May 23, 2001
     

 

Post#11 » by The_Hater » Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:33 pm

If I had to put my money on one team, I'd still pick the Spurs. But they're in for a serious dogfight this year right from the opening round straight through to the finals.
AthensBucks wrote:Lowry is done.
Nurse is below average at best.
Masai is overrated.
I dont get how so many people believe in the raptors,they have zero to chance to win it all.


April 14th, 2019.
I_Like_Dirt
RealGM
Posts: 36,054
And1: 9,436
Joined: Jul 12, 2003
Location: Boardman gets paid!

 

Post#12 » by I_Like_Dirt » Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:35 pm

kmatrixg wrote:Thats really what I wanted to discuss, indirectly. Honestly, there is no one in the West without a weakness. We proved, along with the Cavs (which was a fluke win) that bench play, and a consistent 48 minutes of hustly can beat the Spurs, who play to break you down, and then take advantage when you're tired. Last night when LeBron sat - the Cavs went on a streak. The Spurs had some fight in them towards the end, but it was too much because James was back on the floor by then.


I hate to break it to you, but the Cavs were 2-0 against the Spurs in the regular season last season and then matched up against them in the finals. They've proved nothing more this season.

Good teams lose a few games in the regular season and don't worry too much about it. Come the playoffs they're right where they need to be. Boston is an interesting case because I get the sense that they actually ARE worrying a bit about losing the odd game just a little bit and I've never really seen that before, even from the 72-10 Bulls team.
Bucket! Bucket!
Pchu
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,972
And1: 230
Joined: Jun 25, 2004

 

Post#13 » by Pchu » Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:35 pm

They don't play for real until the annual rodeo road trip in Feb.
User avatar
ruckus
RealGM
Posts: 13,628
And1: 11,359
Joined: May 18, 2007
Location: From the Slums of Shaolin...
 

 

Post#14 » by ruckus » Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:41 pm

SAS is still the team to beat. They'll be ready by the time April rolls around.

I'd have the top 3 as:

SAS
DET
BOS

Until Phoenix proves me otherwise, they're #4.

The OP is right however. The Spurs are starting to get up there in age. I'm pretty confident that Buford can make the right moves to re-tool if age becomes too much of a factor.
Image
User avatar
kingr
Head Coach
Posts: 6,902
And1: 3,145
Joined: Aug 03, 2006

 

Post#15 » by kingr » Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:45 pm

Every year no one talks about the spurs... Then they come and win a championship. I wouldn't count them out just yet.
hoop_head
RealGM
Posts: 10,955
And1: 2,235
Joined: Feb 02, 2006
Location: Nova Scotia
   

 

Post#16 » by hoop_head » Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:55 pm

I wouldn't bet against the Spurs finally winning back-to-back Championships.
User avatar
user name
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,911
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 24, 2005

 

Post#17 » by user name » Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:55 pm

Spurs are 8-9 in their last 17 games. That is very noticeable, even given their regular season play in the last couple of years. Pop said last night-- as bad as the defense has been, the offense is even worse.

As to bringing in younger players, the Spurs have brought in a few, but they never get any playing time or chance to develop because the team is about winning now.

Buford was not the brains behind some of the great moves the Spurs made-- Sam Presti was and he is in Seattle now. He was the one who pushed the drafting of Parker.
I_Like_Dirt
RealGM
Posts: 36,054
And1: 9,436
Joined: Jul 12, 2003
Location: Boardman gets paid!

 

Post#18 » by I_Like_Dirt » Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:56 pm

ruckus wrote:Until Phoenix proves me otherwise, they're #4.


Why do the Suns have to prove they can beat the Spurs in the playoffs when the Celtics and Pistons haven't done so already? I've got no real problem with your order, but I'm always baffled when people suggest that the Suns are less of a contender because they're a longshot to beat the WC favourite when in reality the EC champion is at least as unlikely to beat them.
Bucket! Bucket!
Southward1
General Manager
Posts: 9,066
And1: 2,411
Joined: Jul 31, 2006
       

 

Post#19 » by Southward1 » Fri Jan 18, 2008 4:59 pm

They are the team to beat, and don't be foolish enough to fall into there regular season trap again.
User avatar
kmatrixg
Veteran
Posts: 2,801
And1: 118
Joined: Jul 20, 2007
Location: Geographically: Northern Hemisphere; Socially: On the margins; Narratively: A long way to go

 

Post#20 » by kmatrixg » Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:03 pm

I don't see where the trap is this year - they are playing visibly worse. Duncan is showing extreme frustration on the court, they have lost 9 of 17, the 2nd team offense is completely stagnant other than Ginobili off the bench, and they have no consistent talent other than the 5 guys I mentioned earlier. I really think they have a big problem starting to rise. After this year, they may not be the same team. I don't think Duncan has another 365 days of consecutive basketball in him.

Return to Toronto Raptors