Which of these players should be in the HOF?

Moderators: bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, ken6199, Domejandro

penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,145
And1: 9,762
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

Which of these players should be in the HOF? 

Post#1 » by penbeast0 » Fri Jan 18, 2008 1:27 pm

Noticed these players aren't in the HOF . . . .which do you think should be a lock, marginal, or no way?
Terry Cummings
Tom Chambers
Adrian Dantley
Walter Davis
Patrick Ewing
Artis Gilmore
Spencer Haywood
Dennis Johnson
Bernard King
Shawn Kemp
George McGinnis
Reggie Miller
Larry Nance
Hakeem Olujawon
Scottie Pippen
Mitch Richmond
David Robinson
Jack Sikma
Buck Williams
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
User avatar
Point forward
Head Coach
Posts: 6,200
And1: 285
Joined: May 16, 2007
Location: Eating crow for the rest of my life :D

Re: Which of these players should be in the HOF? 

Post#2 » by Point forward » Fri Jan 18, 2008 1:43 pm

penbeast0 wrote:Noticed these players aren't in the HOF . . . .which do you think should be a lock, marginal, or no way?
Terry Cummings -- marginal
Tom Chambers -- marginal
Adrian Dantley -- yes
Walter Davis -- maybe
Patrick Ewing -- lock
Artis Gilmore -- yes
Spencer Haywood -- should be in there
Dennis Johnson -- yes
Bernard King -- possibly
Shawn Kemp -- nope (drugs are bad)
George McGinnis -- should be in there
Reggie Miller -- lock (too clutch, all time best Pacer)
Larry Nance -- not really
Hakeem Olujawon -- lock
Scottie Pippen -- lock
Mitch Richmond -- probably
David Robinson -- lock
Jack Sikma -- not really
Buck Williams -- marginal
writerman
Banned User
Posts: 6,836
And1: 5
Joined: Sep 02, 2002

HOF 

Post#3 » by writerman » Fri Jan 18, 2008 3:11 pm

Reggie Miller for one, but the biggest disgrace is that Artis Gilmore isn't already there.
User avatar
hermes
RealGM
Posts: 96,272
And1: 25,451
Joined: Aug 27, 2007
Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
 

Re: HOF 

Post#4 » by hermes » Fri Jan 18, 2008 3:37 pm

writerman wrote:Reggie Miller for one, but the biggest disgrace is that Artis Gilmore isn't already there.

ewing
pippen
hakeem
robinson
are locks too
fleet40
Junior
Posts: 415
And1: 49
Joined: May 15, 2007

Re: Which of these players should be in the HOF? 

Post#5 » by fleet40 » Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:14 pm

penbeast0 wrote:Noticed these players aren't in the HOF . . . .which do you think should be a lock, marginal, or no way?
Terry Cummings
Tom Chambers
Adrian Dantley
Walter Davis
Patrick Ewing
Artis Gilmore
Spencer Haywood
Dennis Johnson
Bernard King
Shawn Kemp
George McGinnis
Reggie Miller
Larry Nance
Hakeem Olujawon
Scottie Pippen
Mitch Richmond
David Robinson
Jack Sikma
Buck Williams


Where's Laimbeer on this list? Where is Rodman? Two guys right there who really deserve to be in the Hall, and who will get the shaft because they didn't play "nice". And did not kiss anyone's behind.
HarlemHeat37
Banned User
Posts: 6,570
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 14, 2006

 

Post#6 » by HarlemHeat37 » Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:16 pm

either way, I think Rodman will get in at the end..he deserves it..
ropjhk
RealGM
Posts: 19,312
And1: 12,420
Joined: Jul 09, 2002
     

 

Post#7 » by ropjhk » Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:38 pm

Rodman will never get in, though he deserves it.
fleet40
Junior
Posts: 415
And1: 49
Joined: May 15, 2007

 

Post#8 » by fleet40 » Fri Jan 18, 2008 6:42 pm

ropjhk wrote:Rodman will never get in, though he deserves it.


And it appalls me to agree with it. Rodman was pound for pound the best rebounder of his era.

Laimbeer was the greatest defensive rebounder of his era, and was the best outside shooting big man of his time. Both deserve to go. They both helped generate money for the league, (both by their darker styles, and fans loving to hate them) and by their fine checks to the league. They were the best villains the game has ever had, I would argue Laimbeer was the NBA's greatest villain. But their contributions to their teams success cannot be understated. Hell Bill was one of the most versatile, and dependable centers that I have ever seen.

But outside of Detroit, and Chicago most fans refuse to give these guys their due.

Bill Walton "Of course Laimbeer was the must underrated player of all-time. Everyone hated his guts!"
Blame Rasho
On Leave
Posts: 42,049
And1: 9,728
Joined: Apr 25, 2002

 

Post#9 » by Blame Rasho » Fri Jan 18, 2008 7:09 pm

Terry Cummings- The Carlos Boozer before there was Carlos Boozer.
Tom Chambers
Adrian Dantley He should have already been in
Walter Davis
Patrick Ewing Lock
Artis Gilmore He should have already been in... biased due to the fact that he played in the ABA
Spencer Haywood First undergrad to make an impact in the pros
Dennis Johnson
Bernard King Deadly scorer
Shawn Kemp
George McGinnis
Reggie Miller Deadly shooter
Larry Nance
Hakeem Olujawon Lock
Scottie Pippen Lock
Mitch Richmond Underrated by the masses
David Robinson Lock
Jack Sikma
Buck Williams
User avatar
AbdicatedReign
Pro Prospect
Posts: 814
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 22, 2007
Location: Emerald City

 

Post#10 » by AbdicatedReign » Fri Jan 18, 2008 7:10 pm

Seriously? People don't think Kemp should be in the Hall of Fame?
Blame Rasho
On Leave
Posts: 42,049
And1: 9,728
Joined: Apr 25, 2002

 

Post#11 » by Blame Rasho » Fri Jan 18, 2008 7:12 pm

AbdicatedReign wrote:Seriously? People don't think Kemp should be in the Hall of Fame?


He never even once managed to get a 20/10 season... a good player in his time but not a hall of fame player.

I am not sure how old you are but I would rather have a Prime Terry Cummings compared to Kemp.
Dan Z
RealGM
Posts: 18,284
And1: 9,003
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Location: Chicago
 

 

Post#12 » by Dan Z » Fri Jan 18, 2008 7:18 pm

Did Kemp win a championship? I think he won't make it due to his decline in production due to drugs(and being out of shape).

Mitch Richmond was a great player too. Very consistent. But, for some reason, I don't think of him as a hall of fame player.
User avatar
Mr. Fart
Ballboy
Posts: 44
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 20, 2007

 

Post#13 » by Mr. Fart » Fri Jan 18, 2008 9:53 pm

My thoughts are;
Patrick Ewing
Bernard King
Reggie Miller
Hakeem Olujawon
Scottie Pippen
Mitch Richmond
David Robinson
should have already been

Shawn Kemp - although I'm a sonics fan, Kemp is not a caliber of player for HOF, looking objectively really isn't
Image
User avatar
SamBone
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,477
And1: 4
Joined: Feb 06, 2006

Re: Which of these players should be in the HOF? 

Post#14 » by SamBone » Fri Jan 18, 2008 9:56 pm

penbeast0 wrote:Noticed these players aren't in the HOF . . . .which do you think should be a lock, marginal, or no way?
Terry Cummings-no
Tom Chambers-no
Adrian Dantley-narginal but will get in
Walter Davis-marginal but no
Patrick Ewing-lock
Artis Gilmore-marginal yes
Spencer Haywood-no
Dennis Johnson-marginal but no
Bernard King-no
Shawn Kemp-no but maybe 1 of this 100 kids will make it some day
George McGinnis-no
Reggie Miller-lock
Larry Nance-marginal but no
Hakeem Olujawon-lock
Scottie Pippen-yes but not a fan
Mitch Richmond-marginal but no
David Robinson-lock
Jack Sikma-no
Buck Williams-no
User avatar
The NarrF
Sophomore
Posts: 142
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 31, 2007
Location: Toronto

 

Post#15 » by The NarrF » Fri Jan 18, 2008 10:07 pm

Hakeem should definitely be there first and foremost in my opinion.
After that Scottie Pippen.
a-rod
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,778
And1: 21
Joined: Aug 12, 2006
Location: Rest In Peace Dad
Contact:
       

 

Post#16 » by a-rod » Fri Jan 18, 2008 10:16 pm

TD is the MAN wrote:Terry Cummings- The Carlos Boozer before there was Carlos Boozer.
Tom Chambers
Adrian Dantley He should have already been in
Walter Davis
Patrick Ewing Lock
Artis Gilmore He should have already been in... biased due to the fact that he played in the ABA
Spencer Haywood First undergrad to make an impact in the pros
Dennis Johnson
Bernard King Deadly scorer
Shawn Kemp
George McGinnis
Reggie Miller Deadly shooter
Larry Nance
Hakeem Olujawon Lock
Scottie Pippen Lock
Mitch Richmond Underrated by the masses
David Robinson Lock
Jack Sikma
Buck Williams

TD my man great knowledge, i didn't even see half of these guys play so thanks for the info.

my picks:
Patrick Ewing Lock
Hakeem Olujawon Lock
Scottie Pippen Lock
David Robinson Lock
Reggie Miller Lock
Mitch Richmond I'm kings fan so yes hes in
Adrian Dantley not really a team player
Bernard King some day but not anytime soon
pillwenney wrote:
SacKingZZZ wrote:No thanks to Deng. I read a rumor surfing hoopshype awhile back saying Gay for Reke is a possibility.


Must be true, if it's a rumor you read on Hoopshype.
:rofl:
User avatar
AbdicatedReign
Pro Prospect
Posts: 814
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 22, 2007
Location: Emerald City

 

Post#17 » by AbdicatedReign » Fri Jan 18, 2008 10:37 pm

TD is the MAN wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

He never even once managed to get a 20/10 season... a good player in his time but not a hall of fame player.

I am not sure how old you are but I would rather have a Prime Terry Cummings compared to Kemp.


Terry was a hell of an offensive player for a long time, no disputing that. But if we're talking about the Basketball Hall of Fame, I feel Kemp's overall impact during his prime is worthy of at least some consideration. He was the best (arguably) PF during a four-man windfall in the NBA and helped usher in the age of the hyper-athletic frontcourt players we see now. So, though he didn't have any 20/10 seasons (he did have four 18/10 and one 20/9 season-- Cummings didn't ever average 20/10 after his rookie year, by the by) I feel that he left a far greater impression on the game than raw numbers would indicate.

(As an aside, his numbers are quite similar to Cummings: 10 years of prime-level production, more career RPG and less career PPG; very similar FG%s; Kemp had better defensive numbers and FT%)
clutch24
Junior
Posts: 473
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Location: Globetrotter Home Planet

 

Post#18 » by clutch24 » Fri Jan 18, 2008 10:38 pm

Dan Z wrote:Did Kemp win a championship? I think he won't make it due to his decline in production due to drugs(and being out of shape).

Mitch Richmond was a great player too. Very consistent. But, for some reason, I don't think of him as a hall of fame player.


I completely agree with the Mitch Richmond statement above, he is a good player and perenial all-star. It's really difficult to call him hall of fame worthy.

Also you cannot omit Kemp because of drug problems, many other HOF's had issues of their own. Albeit it doesn't help the argument to get him in.
User avatar
TonyMontana
RealGM
Posts: 11,726
And1: 398
Joined: Apr 27, 2006
Location: Loungin in the Cali sun.
     

 

Post#19 » by TonyMontana » Fri Jan 18, 2008 10:46 pm

I cant believe that some of you guys arent mentioning Artis Gilmore in your posts .

He is by far the first on my list and like T.D said he should have been in there a long time ago .
Image
User avatar
pillwenney
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 48,887
And1: 2,603
Joined: Sep 19, 2004
Location: Avidly reading pstyousuck.blogspot.com/
Contact:
 

 

Post#20 » by pillwenney » Fri Jan 18, 2008 11:11 pm

Dan Z wrote:Did Kemp win a championship? I think he won't make it due to his decline in production due to drugs(and being out of shape).

Mitch Richmond was a great player too. Very consistent. But, for some reason, I don't think of him as a hall of fame player.


That's because he was surrounded with crap throughout his career in Sac. If one were to combine all of the best players that Mitch had around him, throughout his tenure, the lineup would look like this.


Lionel Simmons
Spud Webb/Tyus Edney/Anthony Johnson
Mitch Richmond/Mahmoud Abdul-Rauf
Walt Williams/Lionel Simmons/Billy Owens
Wayman Tisdale/Corliss Williamson
Brian Grant/Olden Polynice/Dwayne Causwell

And that is a combination of the very best players he played with. Never mind the fact that Simmons started sucking after 4 years, Williams, Williamson, Johnson, Edney and Grant really only played with him at the beginning of their careers (and none exactly went on to be studs), and Abdul-Rauf was past his prime when he came here. Oh, and the best real center he ever played with in Sac was Olden Polynice.

Really, we might have been better off without him because without Mitch, we would have had the most ping pong balls every single year.

Return to The General Board