MIL-CHI-NYK-IND

Baddy Chuck · Post #1 » by **Baddy Chuck** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 5:00 am

Just made this trade for the hell of it.

Milwaukee trades: Michael Redd, Charlie Villanueva, Bobby Simmons, Dan Gadzuric, Jake Vohskul, David Noel

Milwaukee recieves: Zach Randolph, Jamaal Tinsley, Joe Smith, Andres Nocioni, Indiana 08 First, Chicago 08 First

Why for the Bucks? This is pretty much a "high risk, high reward" type of deal. They do recieve two low character players, but they also recieve 2 high character players and 2 draft picks also. Pretty much unload dead weight and Redd for productive players and picks.

Chicago trades: Andres Nocioni, Joe Smith, Chris Duhon, Tyrus Thomas, Viktor Khryapa, 08 First

Chicago recieves: Jermaine O'Neal, Renaldo Balkman, David Noel (Or other cheap filler from the Bucks?)

Why for Chicago? They recieve a legit low post threat to go with the players they already have. They also recieve a decent prospect in Balkman.

Indiana trades: Jermaine O'Neal, Jamaal Tinsley, 08 First

Indiana recieves: Michael Redd, Tyrus Thomas, Jake Vohskul, Chris Duhon, Viktor Khryapa

Why for Indiana? They recieve a star player and a good young prospect for their star. They also get out of Jamaal Tinsley's whole contract with all expiring for only a first.

New York trades: Zach Randolph, Renaldo Balkman

New York recieves: Charlie Villanueva, Bobby Simmons, Dan Gadzuric

Why for New York? They get rid of Zach Randolph. Apparently the deal has already been proposed.

Not really a realistic deal since its a 4 team trade with lots of players moving and 3 teams are in the same division but just wanted to see what people thought of it.

Friend_Of_Haley · Post #2 » by **Friend_Of_Haley** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 5:03 am

With the deal Chicago:
Takes on a bunch of extra salary
Marginally upgrades front court offense
Loses their first rounder
Loses a good young prospect
Gives up an expiring serviceable point guard

Just Great!

bucksbrewerspackersfan · Post #3 » by **bucksbrewerspackersfan** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 5:12 am

Bucks decline just bad for us. We don't Z. Randolph and we have no use for Tinsley on the basis we have Mo Will, C. Bell, R, Ivey, and R Sessions who can play the point. So getting that cancer of a player no thank you when we have enough guys to the play just awful. I like getting the rest of the package but those two players don't make it worth it. Also who would the Bucks use as our back up center? We would have Bogut and who else??? All in all not bad but the trash with good stuff makes me say no way jose. The negatives outweigh the positives for Milwaukee.

BucksRuleAll22 · Post #4 » by **BucksRuleAll22** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 5:44 am

Randolph and Tinsley. I don't think this team needs cancer or a thug.