PC Board Fantasy Draft-Judging Over...Congrats Myth-Breaker!

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

User avatar
NO-KG-AI
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,083
And1: 20,034
Joined: Jul 19, 2005
Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets

 

Post#121 » by NO-KG-AI » Fri Jan 18, 2008 9:20 pm

David West isn't really a product of a good PG, he plays well without Chris, he's going to score off of his own creation.
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
Kosta
RealGM
Posts: 16,353
And1: 2
Joined: Apr 03, 2006

 

Post#122 » by Kosta » Fri Jan 18, 2008 9:25 pm

I'll try to get my write-up in by sometime tomorrow.

Two evenly matched teams, neither side has any big mismatches, it's going to be a dogfight.

Thanks for the kind words TMAC, let the best team win.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,347
And1: 9,901
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

 

Post#123 » by penbeast0 » Sat Jan 19, 2008 3:38 am

TMAC, when do you want 2nd round judging to start?
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
Warspite
RealGM
Posts: 13,527
And1: 1,230
Joined: Dec 13, 2003
Location: Surprise AZ
Contact:
       

 

Post#124 » by Warspite » Sat Jan 19, 2008 8:42 am

Pistons vs Wiz


PG:Mike Bibby/Antonio Daniels/Rajon Rando
SG:Manu Ginoboli/Josh Childress
SF:Lebron James/Renaldo Balkman
PF:Gerald Wallace/Boris Diaw/Craig Smith
C:Rasheed Wallace/Brandon Haywood

PG Felton, Barbosa, Ridnour
SG Martin, Crawford
SF Miller, Garcia
PF KG, Mays
C Camby, Bogut, Foster


Wiz: 3 blackholes, 1 guy that cant create his own shot and a C that doesnt rebound nor play inside for more than 10mins a game. No shotblocking and the best outside shooter is the starting C.

The 1st task when playing the Wiz is dealing with LBJ. IMHO the easiest way to slow down LBJ is make him play defense. The Pistons will run Miller off of screens attempting to wear down the King and make him reach in and foul. LBJ will also have to reb alot and he will get banged inside trying to rebound. Balkman is just a hustle guy with very limited skills. The contrast between the 2 is so large that any game LBJ is in early foul trouble the game can quickly become a blowout.

The Pistons on defense will trap LBJ and go after him with shotblockers. The object is simply to force tough shots and not give easy looks. The Pistons will then use there superior rebounding and outlet for the fast break. Forcing long jumpshots and then dunking on the fastbreak is the easiest way to win a game.

The Pistons attack the small Wizards team by posting up KG. Sheed will no doubt be gaurding him and KG is the best guy to get Sheed in early foul trouble and then tach on a tech or 2 and send him to the showers. This also creates a mismatch with Camby crashing the offensive boards over a smaller Wallace.

Kevin Martin and Jamal Crawford are 2 very underrated SGs. Martin is having a better yr than Redd, VC, Pierce and JJ all the while playing with no PG and little help. Crawford is having a great yr as well and one of the streakiest shooters in the NBA. Because hes a Knick hes considered trash but if he played for your fav team and was scoring 20ppg you would love him. Both are great shooters that stretch defenses and can knock down open shots that KG creates for them.

We all know how great Bibby was 3 or 4 yrs ago but hes slowed down and his jumpshot is not nearly what it used to be. Fleton and Barbosa are going to attack, attack and attack. With bad weakside defense or none at all (Frontcourt staying at home vs KG,Camby, Bogut) Felton and Barbosa look to wear down (foul trouble) and tire Bibby. Daniels is one of my fav players with his hustle but hes outmatched and will give up alot of quickness. Bibby is primarily a spot up shooter in this offense and hes rarely going to be able to take adv of Felton.

I believe Manu would be better served to be the 6th man to counter Barbosa. He needs the ball in his hands and Im not sure thats going to happen with LBJ. Manu will get his but hes going to be outplayed by Martin. Either way when Manu has the ball LBJ is automaticly being shut down. It coul dbe said the best way to shut down LBJ is to let Manu get his touches. IMHO whatever Manu/Childress score Martin/Crawford are getting +10-15ppg. Because the Wizards are so small upfront the Pistons can run a 3 guard offense for short periods and attempt the run the Wizards out of the building.


I believe the Pistons are going to win in 5 games for the following reasons

1. Size: The Pistons will outrebound and shoot a higher FG% as well as getting more possesions.

2. Conventional style: The Wiz are essentialy useing LBJ at PG, Bibby at SG and Sheed at SF on offense. Every 3pt shot that Sheed misses will be a dunk for the Pistons. The Pistons have clearly defined roles and its best player can play defense and score allowing him to lead by example.

3. Bench/Depth: Barbosa, Bogut and to a much lesser extent Crawford could start for the Wiz and are superior to the bench players of the Wiz. The Wizards have some great hustle guys that defend but there offense is very weak. Once a starter sits/foul trouble/injury the Wiz have to change there entire focus of there offense and sometimes have to play 4on5.

4. Frontcourt mobility: KG/Camby can get out and run the break beating there bigmen opponets down the court for easy layups.

5. Offensive Balance: The Pistons have 2-20ppg and 4-15ppg scorers in its top 7 players. The Wiz rely on LBJ and Manu to carry the offensive load and dont seem to have the balance with only 1 bench player avg +10ppg currently.

6. Sheed: Will he be a stud low post player or a 3pt bricklayer that melts down under pressure. Hes not getting any star calls vs KG and the likelyhood of a meltdown ala 07 vs Cavs grows with each passing game/loss. Once Sheed is neutered Haywood and Diaw are very poor substitutes.


In closeing

The Pistons attempt to force long jumpshots and funnel dribble penetration into Camby/KG. Def rebounding and outlet for the fast break.

The Pistons look to post up KG and play inside/out to open shooters (Mike Miller, Kevin Martin, and Raymond Felton). Felton/Martin attempting to get into the paint vs weak shotblockers and or frontcourt players that are not leaving there man for offensive rebs and alley-opps.
VintaGe36
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,032
And1: 88
Joined: May 04, 2007
       

 

Post#125 » by VintaGe36 » Sat Jan 19, 2008 9:22 am

A few things here:

How do I have THREE Black holes!?

Lebron Manu and Bibby!?
They have all been capable play makers on teams that reached the NBA Finals. Where do you get the notion that they are blackholes?

Bogut would NOT start on my team.

Haywood,Gerald Wallace and Rasheed Wallace are all better.

You underrate Haywood alot here. Hes a top 10 center defensively and top 15 overall.

How can you call LEBRON JAMES a black hole than say that Crawford is underrated and would start on my team? Thats a HUGE hypocritical statement if I've ever seen one.

The PPG argument is pretty weak too.

Do you really expect Barbosa,Miller, Felton,Martin,AND Crawford to all get their fair share of shots? ALL Those guys are used to alot of shots, PLUS KG? Good luck finding shots for all those guys. Your "depth" is overrated. During the playoffs, rotations are shrunk, and only 8-9 guys are really going to be needed.
VintaGe36
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,032
And1: 88
Joined: May 04, 2007
       

 

Post#126 » by VintaGe36 » Sat Jan 19, 2008 10:00 am

Wizards vs. Pistons


PG:Mike Bibby/Antonio Daniels/Rajon Rando
SG:Manu Ginoboli/Josh Childress
SF:Lebron James/Renaldo Balkman
PF:Gerald Wallace/Boris Diaw/Craig Smith
C:Rasheed Wallace/Brandon Haywood

PG Felton, Barbosa, Ridnour
SG Martin, Crawford
SF Miller, Garcia
PF KG, Mays
C Camby, Bogut, Foster



KG is KG, he will get his 20,10, with GREAT D. There really is no stopping that. My plan is to stop his shooters. Mike Miller is a GREAT Shooter, as is Kevin Martin, so by neutralizing them, and packing the lane, I can make things rather difficult for KG.

I'm gonna make KG bang for ALL his points, I'll have a defender in his face when hes anywhere outside the paint, and have weakside help on him.

WarSpite did have a point with Bibby, I don't know if he can keep up with Barbosa. So, to counteract that, I'm going with a less than conventional starting lineup.

Manu Ginoboli
Lebron James
Gerald Wallace
Rasheed Wallace
Brandon Haywood

This is an EXTREMELY good defensive squad. Rasheed and Haywood(and Gerald, one of the better weakside defenders in the league) will crowd KG all day.

I'll have Lebron and Ginoboli watching the perimeter with Gerald when hes not helping out on KG. Honestly, Kevin Martin and Mike Miller will not carry them this whole series. I look at their backcourt and dont see a guy who can carry them for a whole series, so basically, if I can shut down KG,(to a certain extent, it is afterall...KG) I can neutralize their team. In a 7 game series, KG will wear down if Warspite is going to be playing him as much as I think he is. His only backup is Sean May, a guy who cannot really seem to stay healthy.That PF rotation doesn't scare me at all after KG, so if I can get KG to wear down,(he will in a 7 game series, with that much attention on him, and with not a very reliable backup)I can take over the game. Camby is a GREAT defensive player, but using Rasheed to bring him to the perimeter opens up ALOT of space for Lebron and Manu to penetrate. Tell me, who at the 1,2 or 3 has the muscle and agility to keep up with Lebron? I don't see a single guy. Lebron IMO will punish those 2's and 3's.


I see NO REAL PG on that team IMO.

He has a bunch of finishers, so if I take KG out of the game, I make Kevin Martin, Mike Miller of Raymond Felton be the playmaker and it seriously downgrades their offense.

CHA fans will own up to this Felton is an ideal Combo guard, he has not shown he can be a prime time PG in the playoffs. I'll expose that. Whoever he guards,(Lebron,Gerald Wallace or Manu) its a mis-match. A mismatch I will expose. Barbosa is nothing to write home about when it comes to D, and we all know how bad Ridnour has been. Than at the 2, theres Kevin Martin and Crawford. Nobody screams "Stopper" on D to me, and I have TWO Guys who are going to need to get stopped. He has no answer for LBJ or Manu.

With my NEW lineup, I address ANY size disadvantages I once had.

Plus Mike Bibby can come in and be a scoring punch of the bench of need be.

Josh Childress is underrated here, and in his role( a sixth/seventh man type player) he can play effectively and chip in points with solid D.

Renaldo Balkman has no Jumpshot whatsoever, I know this, if I use him this series, it will be for an energy injection, and to bother Camby and KG.Balkman can guard the 4 and 5 relatively decently, but it is KG, so I dont expect him to be a stopper. He will just try to tire them out, and bring out the reserves, who are noticeably worse.KG and Camby have DPOY skills respectively, so in all honesty, inside points will be harder to get. Lebron and Manu, however have playoff experience and are BOTH very good slashers while being good shooters. If they attack enough, KG or Camby will get into foul trouble. IF either do, the drop off is substantial.
IMO Craig Smith is pretty comparable to Sean May, although Craig is a bit undersized. May really shouldn't be the ideal backup PF, especially in the playoffs.(rotations are shrunk, but how long can you go with a two man PF rotation with such a HUGE dropoff?)

So in conclusion.

1. Stop KG
2. Bully the Perimeter with superior size and versatility. Miller isn't a GREAT slasher, so Lebron will most likely guard him. Ill put Manu on whoever plays PG and let Gerald Wallace handle Kevin Martin.
3.Stop KG
4. Force Someone other than KG to play playmaker.
5. Tire out KG and Camby to bring out the reserves.
6. Bother KG
7.Let Lebron and Manu do what they do best. Take over series in the playoffs.

All in all, I think my gameplan is pretty sound, although maybe I could pay more attention to KG. :-?
User avatar
TMACFORMVP
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,947
And1: 161
Joined: Jun 30, 2006
Location: 9th Seed

 

Post#127 » by TMACFORMVP » Sat Jan 19, 2008 4:51 pm

penbeast0 wrote:TMAC, when do you want 2nd round judging to start?


Hmm I was thinking it could have started today but considering Kosta said he'd post his argument by today, we'll wait for him and any other arguments today and judging can begin tomorrow. :)
User avatar
randomhero423
Head Coach
Posts: 7,013
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 09, 2006
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Contact:

 

Post#128 » by randomhero423 » Sat Jan 19, 2008 7:51 pm

i'll post mine tonight.
My High School Basketball Articles:
www.nyhoops.com

My Sports Blog
myrandomsportsblog.blogspot.com
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,347
And1: 9,901
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

 

Post#129 » by penbeast0 » Sat Jan 19, 2008 8:36 pm

Thanks
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
Warspite
RealGM
Posts: 13,527
And1: 1,230
Joined: Dec 13, 2003
Location: Surprise AZ
Contact:
       

 

Post#130 » by Warspite » Sat Jan 19, 2008 8:46 pm

Very good post


With LBJ at PG the Pistons defense doesnt change that much in that they still want to him to shoot the 17-20ft jump shot fading left or right off the dribble. Knowing hes at the top of the key, running the offense and bringing up the ball allows the Pistons to half court trap and try to force TOs w/o a true PG. I personaly like playing defense vs a team whos PG is a league leader in TOs.

Having LBJ guarding Felton or chasing Martin along the baseline is a postive and just maybe some fatigue will set in. Again no team outside of Myths can play great outside D in this 16 team league. Theres simply too many scorers and besides the object of the game is to score the most pts not play the best def. Do I expect to hold LBJ to 20ppg?? Absolutley not. The goal is 40%FG. I fully expect Manu to get 20ppg as well.

The Haywood move does help on defense but again hes not a great low post option and the Wizards are still missing that ability to throw the ball into the post and take a high % shot. The Wizards will rely on the refs to get them easy pts from the FT line. I just dont believe its a sound strategy that will work for a long series.

The Wizards have 1 great scorer and 1 very good scorer. They both are outside players. The Pistons use a more balanced approach and dont rely so much on 1 or 2 players to carry them. This Wizards does remind me alot of AIs 76er team in that he has some scrapy defenders and a great scorer. This team lives and dies on the jumpshot and LBJs athletic ability. LBJ will have to score 40-50 one game and avg over 30ppg. Im not a fan of a team thats PG is also its leading scorer and takes +25% of its FGA.

The Pistons want to play a 3 man rotation up front with KG, Camby and Bogut. 85-90 mins between 3 frontcout players is very doable. Mays when healthy is a player that puts up similar stats to Haywood who is a starter for the Wizards. Regardless LBJ will have to play longer than KG and he will be chasing PGs around the court.

It boils down to the belief that LBJ/Manu are a more dominate backcourt than KG/Camby is a frontcourt. It also assumes that backcourts are more important than frontcourts and that LBJ is a Magic Johnson clone. Will the help defense of G. Wallace be on par as that of Marcus Camby?

The Pistons will control the paint and the rebounds. They are also the faster breaking team and will have fewer TOs with better PG play.

The Pistons with better FG%, more FGAs (offensive reb) better 3ptfg%, more rebs and fewer TOs sound like a recipe for success IMHO.

The Wizards are the team with lineup changes and playing players out of position in an attempt to matchup.

VintaGe36
I enjoy reading your posts and respect very much what you think. I do not expect you to agree with me nor do I want you too. Im not trying to change your mind nor am I trying to be objective. please take nothing I say personal or as a personal attack. You and I drafted right after each other and I know better than anyone (just like you) how hard it was finding supporting players and a bench when we were drafting at the bottom almost every rd. That is the punishment for having a superstar player in that our teams dont look as balanced as others and so we had to make difficult choices and try to specialise in one area or another.
VintaGe36
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,032
And1: 88
Joined: May 04, 2007
       

 

Post#131 » by VintaGe36 » Sat Jan 19, 2008 9:24 pm

Right back at you.

Lebron wont guard Felton though, he will guard Mike Miller.

I built my team on versatility. With Manu AND Lebron as capable ball handlers, I don't need the "ideal" PG. Don't think of my line up as
PG
SG
SF
PF
C

but as

Swingman
Swingman
Swingman/Forward
Forward
Forward

My idea the whole time was to use my versatility and multi talented guys to create mis-matches in my favor.
User avatar
randomhero423
Head Coach
Posts: 7,013
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 09, 2006
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Contact:

 

Post#132 » by randomhero423 » Sun Jan 20, 2008 12:17 am

PG - Jamaal Tinsley/Kirk Hinrich/J.C. Navarro
SG - Bruce Bowen/Ricky Davis/J.C. Navarro
SF - Josh Howard/Wally Szczerbiak
PF - Tim Duncan/Antonio McDyess/Kwame Brown
C - Andrew Bynum/Theo Ratliff, Kwame Brown

vs.

PG- Tony Parker 35 /Derek Fisher 13/Randy Foye
SG- Brandon Roy 35 /Randy Foye 10/Derek Fisher 3
SF- Tayshaun Prince 32 /Shane Battier 11 /Matt Carroll
PF- David West 30 /Shane Battier 15/ Troy Murphy 3/Eddy Curry
C- Yao Ming 38 /Sean Williams 10 /Eddy Curry

I feel my team has the clear advantage in almost every category. I feel aside from Duncan/Howard they are lacking a real offensive threat.

Defensively, I will play a 2-3. I will dare them to shoot outside, as i'm not confident in their bowen (who's aging) and howard duo outside. I will have my middle man (Shane Battier/Sean Williams) shade towards Tim Duncan's side unless Bynum has the ball. Ming will always be on whatever side Duncan is on. West is too short to cover him, and Ming is my best big man defender. I feel a tandem of Ming/Williams can somewhat slow him down. I feel Tinsley/Kirk are overrated PG's and will not be effective in getting all of their players a effective amount of touches.

I feel offensively I'm far more superior then the team I am facing. Aside from Duncan/Howard/Davis (who's off the bench) they really don't have a offensive threat! I feel Bowen is slowing down and I don't think Roy will be that disrupted on offense where he is a non-factor (meaning a stat line like 8 pts, 3 assists, 5 turnovers). ROY does not need to put up big numbers, and he can penetrate very well and make his team better. I am going to make my team attack your bigs (bynum and duncan espically) for most of the game. Roy/Parker are great penetrators, and Battier/Prince/Carroll/Fisher (when roy is in they will platoon PG responsibilities) can all hit the open 3 easily and if not they are all high bball IQ players and keep the ball movement. West/Williams will be my garbage men again going for rebounds most of the time. When West is not double teamed with the ball, he will go staright for the basket and try to get Duncan and/or Bynum in foul trouble.

Ming will be matched up with Duncan throughout the game. I'm going to have Parker and/or Roy/Foye (foye if parker and foye are out..) and attack Duncan/Bynum. Depending on the shot, if they feel they can finish it, they'll go for it (all are good slashers) and if not they'll pass it down low to the open man. Ming is a good PLAYOFF player (well unless 25 and 10 isn't good enough for you). When Ming is standing around mid-range, I'll call for one of my guys to penetrate and this will cause either a easy layup or a wide open ming for a three.

I feel my team's vet expericence is just fine and can't be seen as a weakness!! Parker/Prince/Fisher have all won championships, and Battier/Roy are known has very high bball iq players. Ming is a superstar and will be just fine (unless 25 and 10 are "bad stats"). I think your stretching at that..

I think my team wins in 6 games.
My High School Basketball Articles:
www.nyhoops.com

My Sports Blog
myrandomsportsblog.blogspot.com
User avatar
randomhero423
Head Coach
Posts: 7,013
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 09, 2006
Location: Brooklyn, New York
Contact:

 

Post#133 » by randomhero423 » Sun Jan 20, 2008 12:38 am

the guy on playing on top will go to their side. and if they start draining them, we'll simply go to a man-to-man defense. where i feel matchups like battier vs. howard and prince vs. bowen can easily lean my way.
My High School Basketball Articles:
www.nyhoops.com

My Sports Blog
myrandomsportsblog.blogspot.com
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,347
And1: 9,901
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

 

Post#134 » by penbeast0 » Sun Jan 20, 2008 5:03 pm

2nd ROUND MATCHUP JUDGING -- New Orleans at LA Lakers

I admit to being confused about one thing in the Hornet's writeup. The role of Zack Randolph is unclear. I am assuming he is starting and will be guarding Dirk and all the talk of Posey on him or Oden playing the 4 are second options when Randolph goes to the bench or if he is being abused (with Nocioni playing PF or Randolph guarding Chandler/Pryzbilla).

That said, let's break this down:

Big men. For all the talk, Dirk is considerably better than Randolph and they are the main inside threats here. Kaman and Chandler should be only a slight edge to Kaman and I don't see the inexperience Oden being a difference maker in this series nor does Nocioni or Millsap scare anyone. Advantage LA

Wing/PG play. Kobe and Billups have a solid edge on Rip and TJ; Artest and the stronger bench on LAL lessen this but don't negate it. Advantage New Orleans

Playmaking: Edge to New Orleans in the backcourt and to LAL in the frontcourt again. Overall, PUSH.

Rebounding: tough matchup, slight edge to New Orleans for their bigger backcourt but very slight.

Defense: Despite the whole Randolph thing, New Orleans seems to have the better defenders, again, particularly in the backcourt . . .both benches have some great defenders. Edge New Orleans

Depth: Posey will have his work cut out for him and be playing a lot of minutes. . . which isn't that good, Iggy is a much superior 6th man. Inside, I am curious to see how Oden plays, Durant looks great at times but awful at others, if Oden has the rookie learning curve, edge goes easily to LA Lakers.

Intangibles: Key here is the star play. Who will step up? Kobe and Billups are proven big stage stars, Dirk should have a great series, Artest and Randolph will sometimes be good but are knuckleheads. I like LAL's balance and teamwork better. WASH

Overall: Hard to pick against Kobe and Billups but I think Dirk has enough backup to pull this one off this time with the homecourt advantage. LA LAKERS for the win.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,347
And1: 9,901
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

 

Post#135 » by penbeast0 » Sun Jan 20, 2008 7:26 pm

2nd ROUND MATCHUP JUDGING -- Philadelphia v. New York

Two very solid teams

Big men: This is the key matchup in this series as both teams are post oriented. Duncan and Bynum with help from McDyess facing Yao Ming and David West with Battier and Sean Williams coming in if needed. Yao will guard Duncan as I understand it which means West will be trying to contain Bynum. This isn't a good matchup, Bynum isn't a super skilled player but he's just too big and strong for West, they need to get him into quick foul trouble; if West gets in trouble and Battier comes in it will just be worse. Edge Philadelphia

Wing and Point scoring: Howard and Roy are a nice pair of wings, Bowen and Prince nice defensive complements. I'm not a huge fan of Ricky Davis, Szerbiak always impressed me more in a decent offense; Battier should be more effective with this level of talent but the real edge is Tony Parker at PG over Tinsley/Hinrich. With good shooters that can spread the defense up front, Parker should be a key to this series. Edge New York.

Playmaking: Duncan and Yao are both good post passers, but the guard edge for New York with Parker and Roy both being very smart passers gives New York the edge here.

Rebounding: Philly has the size up front to keep Yao from dominating plus Josh Howard on the wing and better bench rebounding. Edge Philadephia

Defense: The key matchups here of course Yao v. Duncan but also can Philly stop Tony Parker and whether Bynum can use his size/strength advantage. I see Parker being the bigger factor than Bynum offensively, but Duncan's help defense counters that. PUSH

Depth: I don't see Fisher as having problems but Battier and Sean Williams aren't an answer inside. Edge Philadelphia

Intangibles: Duncan, Bowen, Parker, and Prince have all starred in the finals but Duncan is the most influential. Tinsley and Bynum are the most likely to be inconsistent. Edge Philly (the Duncan factor)

Overall: I like both these teams and NY has the extra home game but I don't like their bench where basically Fisher and Battier are the only guys I'd trust. Close series, edge to Philadephia.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,347
And1: 9,901
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

 

Post#136 » by penbeast0 » Sun Jan 20, 2008 7:45 pm

2nd ROUND MATCHUP JUDGING -- Houston v. Seattle

Big man play: JO, Gasol, and Haslem (+Bargnini) v. Brand, Ilgauskas and Collison. Very close, Brand is the best two way player here as Jermaine is quite inefficient for a player with his size. Gasol has a more versatile game than Ilgauskas but just isn't a dominating threat and the bench players aren't going to decide this. Edge to Seattle.

Wing and Point scoring: Both teams are terrific offensively with great shooting off the bench in the pair of Orlando forwards. However, Houston has better defense and Wade is the most likely to step up and dominate since we are assuming full health. Edge Houston

Playmaking: Deron has a clear edge over Harris, both teams have good passing wings. Edge Seattle

Rebounding: Very close. No clear edge anywhere. PUSH

Defense: Some fine interior defense with Ilgauskas and Brand having the edge over O'Neal and Gasol, but the difference on the wings with Wade and Deng gives the edge to Houston.

Bench: Hopefully Seattle will give Turkoglu a bigger role than they did in their first round writeup; he is the best bench player on either team this year. However, Houston has more solid players since I would hate to have to depend on Rafer Alston or Jason Maxiel in key moments. PUSH

Intangibles: Houston the finals MVP in Dwayne Wade, better defense and a deeper bench. However I think Deron Williams and Elton Brand will control the outside/inside play in a very very tight 7 game series that will come down to game 7 where Seattle has homecourt. I pick Seattle (with great hesitation).
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
Myth_Breaker
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,122
And1: 77
Joined: Jun 26, 2006
Location: Otwock, Poland
   

 

Post#137 » by Myth_Breaker » Sun Jan 20, 2008 8:00 pm

randomhero423 wrote:PG - Jamaal Tinsley/Kirk Hinrich/J.C. Navarro
SG - Bruce Bowen/Ricky Davis/J.C. Navarro
SF - Josh Howard/Wally Szczerbiak
PF - Tim Duncan/Antonio McDyess/Kwame Brown
C - Andrew Bynum/Theo Ratliff, Kwame Brown

vs.

PG- Tony Parker 35 /Derek Fisher 13/Randy Foye
SG- Brandon Roy 35 /Randy Foye 10/Derek Fisher 3
SF- Tayshaun Prince 32 /Shane Battier 11 /Matt Carroll
PF- David West 30 /Shane Battier 15/ Troy Murphy 3/Eddy Curry
C- Yao Ming 38 /Sean Williams 10 /Eddy Curry

I feel my team has the clear advantage in almost every category.

Really? So please list these categories since the ones I've listed before (man-to-man defense/rebounding/shotblocking/PG play) give the clear edge to my team.

I feel aside from Duncan/Howard they are lacking a real offensive threat.

See below.

Defensively, I will play a 2-3. I will dare them to shoot outside, as i'm not confident in their bowen (who's aging)

He hasn't shown that yet, remaining in excellent shape, so his age may be only theoretical argument here.

and howard duo outside.

Why? My outside shooters - Josh, Bowen, Szczerbiak and Navarro - are more efficient than yours.

I will have my middle man (Shane Battier/Sean Williams) shade towards Tim Duncan's side unless Bynum has the ball. Ming will always be on whatever side Duncan is on. West is too short to cover him, and Ming is my best big man defender. I feel a tandem of Ming/Williams can somewhat slow him down.

Yao is too immobile for that, while Williams - too short and inexperienced. Face it: you have nobody to guard TD with success. And if Ming focuses on Tim, who's going to cover Bynum?

I feel Tinsley/Kirk are overrated PG's and will not be effective in getting all of their players a effective amount of touches.

You presented no arguments to support this. Hinrich proved he's good enough to start for 50-win Bulls team. Tinsley started for even better Pacers team which went to ECF - and was feeding Jermaine and others just fine, what leads to conclusion that he'll do the same for Duncan and Co.

I feel offensively I'm far more superior then the team I am facing. Aside from Duncan/Howard/Davis (who's off the bench) they really don't have a offensive threat!

Excuse me, but how many FGAs do you expect to take realistically in a playoff game? Actually, total difference between our squads isn't even so big (my guys average 144,3 ppg combined in their current teams, while yours - 154,9 ppg), but it might be just as good 150 as 200 ppg: in playoff reality scores will prolly remain below 100 anyway. Now please answer yourself which team will be more efficient after reducing shot attempts: won't it be defense-oriented squad of mine?

I feel Bowen is slowing down and I don't think Roy will be that disrupted on offense where he is a non-factor (meaning a stat line like 8 pts, 3 assists, 5 turnovers). ROY does not need to put up big numbers,

And he won't. :-) Yet I feel that a player like Bowen gives you more than Brandon if they both aren't putting up big numbers, with his defense, poise, veteran leadership and proven clutchness.

and he can penetrate very well and make his team better. I am going to make my team attack your bigs (bynum and duncan espically) for most of the game. Roy/Parker are great penetrators, and Battier/Prince/Carroll/Fisher (when roy is in they will platoon PG responsibilities) can all hit the open 3 easily and if not they are all high bball IQ players and keep the ball movement. West/Williams will be my garbage men again going for rebounds most of the time. When West is not double teamed with the ball, he will go staright for the basket and try to get Duncan and/or Bynum in foul trouble.

Ming will be matched up with Duncan throughout the game. I'm going to have Parker and/or Roy/Foye (foye if parker and foye are out..

?

) and attack Duncan/Bynum. Depending on the shot, if they feel they can finish it, they'll go for it (all are good slashers) and if not they'll pass it down low to the open man. Ming is a good PLAYOFF player (well unless 25 and 10 isn't good enough for you).

Nice, but Duncan in his playoff career was getting similar or even better numbers (even 25/15 during his best campaign!), while playing for more stacked team and registering far more games, what makes his stats doubly more valuable than Ming's.

When Ming is standing around mid-range, I'll call for one of my guys to penetrate and this will cause either a easy layup or a wide open ming for a three.

Ming for 3? Are you sure about that? ;-)

I feel my team's vet expericence is just fine and can't be seen as a weakness!!

I was talking specifically about Roy and his lack of experience. Other your guys are better at this aspect, but overall I have advantage here, especially as my leader is far more experienced than yours, and leaders' experience is more important than experience of bench players.


Parker/Prince/Fisher have all won championships, and Battier/Roy are known has very high bball iq players. Ming is a superstar and will be just fine (unless 25 and 10 are "bad stats"). I think your stretching at that..

I think my team wins in 6 games.


Sorry, Phila in 6. ;-)
http://wiltfan.tripod.com
Read: Edward Lucas "The New Cold War: Putin's Russia and the Threat to the West".
"So what, son, did your Poles help you?" YES, WE DID!
***** *** Kukiza i Konfederację!
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,347
And1: 9,901
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

 

Post#138 » by penbeast0 » Sun Jan 20, 2008 8:06 pm

2nd ROUND MATCHUP JUDGING -- Detroit v. Washington

I would be interested in seeing how Washington's starting lineup works out but gimmick lineups rarely work out over a long stretch though they can be quite effective in the short term. I think this change weakened Washington's chances though as a Wizard lifer I like seeing someone try to reorganize their team to get Haywood MORE minutes.

Inside play: Camby, Garnett and Bogut/Foster v. Haywood, the Wallace boys and Diaw. No way to see this as anything but a big edge for Kevin Garnett and Detroit.

Wing and point scoring: Martin is a nice scorer, Barbosa is explosive off the bench, but Miller and Felton aren't going to do that much and Jamal Crawford get points as a low percentage gunner; he wouldn't start for Washington and shouldn't even for Isiah. That said, LeBron is easily the dominant player here and Gerard Wallace, Ginobili and Bibby are a match for Detroit's starters even without him. Edge Wash.

Playmaking: Garnett is a great passing big, but LeBron is even better. And Washington has an edge elsewhere as Detroit otherwise has mainly shooters. Edge Washington

Rebounding: Here Garnett has the edge on LeBron and Detroit's surrounding cast the edge on Washington's. Haywood plays D but he isn't much of a defensive rebounder. Edge Detroit

Defense: Here is where the gimmick lineup could hurt Washington. But Detroit already had the edge here with Garnett and Camby patrolling the lanes. Edge Detroit.

Intangibles: LeBron last year did more than Garnett has ever managed getting his team to the finals. Manu has been a part of multiple championships and Washington has homecourt in an extra game too. edge Washington.

Overall: Garnett and Camby are going to dominate inside. LeBron and Manu can win this by getting and staying hot from outside but that is much harder to do. I believe Detroit will win this.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
Myth_Breaker
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,122
And1: 77
Joined: Jun 26, 2006
Location: Otwock, Poland
   

 

Post#139 » by Myth_Breaker » Sun Jan 20, 2008 8:07 pm

randomhero423 wrote:the guy on playing on top will go to their side. and if they start draining them, we'll simply go to a man-to-man defense. where i feel matchups like battier vs. howard and prince vs. bowen can easily lean my way.


1. As U-Borat pointed out, I have great outside shooters to break the zone.
2. Your man-to-man defense is weaker than mine and is not going to suffocate my offense.
3. Prince may even shut down Bowen completely, yet it won't do much damage to my overall offense anyway. ;-) But more seriously: Ty isn't Bowen-like lockdown defender, his better at help defense. While Battier is good overall defender, yet remains too heavy and unathletic to effectively guard Josh. And you have him listed half the time at PF anyway.
http://wiltfan.tripod.com
Read: Edward Lucas "The New Cold War: Putin's Russia and the Threat to the West".
"So what, son, did your Poles help you?" YES, WE DID!
***** *** Kukiza i Konfederację!
Myth_Breaker
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,122
And1: 77
Joined: Jun 26, 2006
Location: Otwock, Poland
   

 

Post#140 » by Myth_Breaker » Sun Jan 20, 2008 8:22 pm

U-Borat wrote:Hey guys, I'm finding these arguments interesting.
And don't think I'm being biased, I'll argue anyone who posts. lol.


MYTH:
Ricky Davis. Note; has he played for a winning/playoff team? Of course, that's not his fault, but it stands. He disrupts/stagnates ball offences with shot-jacking, and pretty much defines the idea of a 'cancer'. And I'm mentioning this because you heavily implied that the gap between your backup and his starter wasn't much...when it quite obviously is.

Much... quite much.. not so much... I won't argue about this single word anymore since this isn't going to change overall picture of our matchup at all.

Bynum; wow, you know I'm a Lakers fan...but its quite blatantly obvious that he thrives off Kobe's double-teams. He is a great finisher around the rim...but that does not equal a great post game. e Your example sucks.

And now he will be thriving off Duncan's double teams. You suck. ;-)

Bynum is nowhere near the physical beast that Shaq is...

Where I said he is? On the other hand, also D. West<prime Rasheed.

while West doesn't live on the perimeter, and has an excellent slashing game.

And it would be better for Yao's Knicks' offensive spacing if he lived more on the perimeter, so in fact you're giving argument against NYK here.

Point duly noted about PF/C combo, though I still believe West/Yao would outscore Duncan/Bynum, albeit with less efficiency.
Have you wtached Hinrich play this season? He's defensively quite average now..a far cry from the All-nba defender from years gone past. I'm nto sure why either...he hypothetically should be in his prime. Chicago give up 3 points less when he's on the bench, and his opponent PER/eFG are both above average.

The whole Bulls team sucks this season, when their lack of post scoring and poor coaching got better of them, yet it would be to naive to judge Chicago players only of basis of current season. Hinrich proved enough what is worth both in offense and defense to conclude that in a team better and stronger than even the best Bulls squads of his he will be more efficient than ever before - especially as he will be relieved of unpleasant duty of guarding bigger SGs every night and will be able to focus on other PGs.

and re: your passing argument. whose going to draw double teams on the perimeter and give easy feeds to bynum here? :lol:

Of course Josh Howard, current MVP of Dallas Mavericks. ;-)

Point noted about roy's playmaking. however, bowen on parker isn't going to work based on your example; parker has far more lateral speed and penetrating ability than chauncey will...who is more of a post-up guard.

Keep the arguments going!


Parker is quicker than Billups (though Bowen has excellent vertical speed himself), but on the other hand is much weaker and more prone to Bowen's physical defense. BB also knows his game perfectly from their trainings together and it's going to help. :-)
http://wiltfan.tripod.com
Read: Edward Lucas "The New Cold War: Putin's Russia and the Threat to the West".
"So what, son, did your Poles help you?" YES, WE DID!
***** *** Kukiza i Konfederację!

Return to Player Comparisons


cron