bigs = zach + eddy + lee fga's
guards = jamal + nate + q fga's
Code: Select all
game bigs guards
det 31 25
was 27 40
@nj 27 44
@was 25 43
Moderators: Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Capn'O, j4remi, Deeeez Knicks, NoLayupRule, mpharris36, GONYK, HerSports85
Code: Select all
game bigs guards
det 31 25
was 27 40
@nj 27 44
@was 25 43
Ignitowsky wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Richardson has always been a volume shooter. The year he led the league in 3pointers made he shot less than 36% from behind the arc, and had Nash to feed him the ball. That same year he shot less than 39% from the field. The only year he's shot over 40% from the field since the 01-02 season was actually last season. For his career, he's shot about 39% from the field and 35% from behind the arc. Injuries have been a factor, but the truth is he isn't a great shooter, not even close.
Capn'O wrote:Well, he's certainly our PG now.
I think he and Rose would work very well in tandom since Rose is so adept at moving the ball. Craw would get more open looks and room to create.
Crawford our future PG?
mjhp911 wrote:Crawford our future PG?
I'm fine with that. Just as long as we get a pure point to back him up next season. Preferably, a wiser, older PG who doesn't break down as much as Knight or Cassell (yeah, where can we find one of those?!). At some point, we still also have to start thinking about a real successor there. Whether in the draft, or the FA pool.
randomhero423 wrote:^
aslong as our plan for that season involves tanking as well. i'm w/ ya.