Should the Nets go for it? (Merged Threads)

Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid

ChampionRed
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,493
And1: 881
Joined: Oct 15, 2005

Should the Nets go for it? (Merged Threads) 

Post#1 » by ChampionRed » Sun Jan 20, 2008 7:27 pm

Netsdaily.com and the realgm wiretap both report that the Nets recent proposal for JO would be Vince Carter, Marcus Williams, and Magloire.

Should the Nets make this trade??

I personally think JO is not worth Carter alone. Adding Marcus Williams in the mix? I really don't think it's worth it. Especially now that JO is out for 2 weeks.

Merged two threads about the JO/Carter deal.

-miller
User avatar
j-ragg
RealGM
Posts: 18,325
And1: 11,679
Joined: Mar 31, 2005
Location: the don't re-sign Hedo bandwagon.
   

 

Post#2 » by j-ragg » Sun Jan 20, 2008 7:32 pm

The Nets need to do something.

I'd probably pull the trigger because of the need for a big man. No reason for Marcus Williams to be in there though.
BadMofoPimp wrote:Durant thinks Vooch is one of the Best Centers in the NBA. I will take his word over a couch-GM yelling at a TV.
NetsForce
Banned User
Posts: 20,711
And1: 29
Joined: Dec 27, 2006

 

Post#3 » by NetsForce » Sun Jan 20, 2008 7:38 pm

They need to do something, but most likely won't. Unless they could obtain say Pau Gasol or Elton Brand (who probably won't be able to do anything this year anyway) I really can't see the Nets making any moves involving Kidd, Carter, or Jefferson. In all likelihood they'll just toil in the depths of mediocrity until the team moves to Brooklyn upon which time a full clean slate rebuild will probably begin...
User avatar
kandiking
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,551
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 21, 2007

 

Post#4 » by kandiking » Sun Jan 20, 2008 7:41 pm

no they should just go for the extra point
Vindicater wrote:KWSN-Men is by far my favourite poster on realgm. He just takes so much punishment and just keeps coming back for more.
Phobo_Phile
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,744
And1: 396
Joined: Jun 12, 2007
Location: Grand Rapids
       

 

Post#5 » by Phobo_Phile » Sun Jan 20, 2008 7:51 pm

NetsForce wrote:They need to do something, but most likely won't. Unless they could obtain say Pau Gasol or Elton Brand (who probably won't be able to do anything this year anyway) I really can't see the Nets making any moves involving Kidd, Carter, or Jefferson. In all likelihood they'll just toil in the depths of mediocrity until the team moves to Brooklyn upon which time a full clean slate rebuild will probably begin...


^Agreed.

If relocation wasn't a factor and they just truly wanted to compete with this core then I definitely think they should do it.
jeremy1215
Banned User
Posts: 3,434
And1: 4
Joined: May 31, 2007

 

Post#6 » by jeremy1215 » Sun Jan 20, 2008 7:53 pm

Pacers do this even without Marcus Williams.
User avatar
celticfan42487
RealGM
Posts: 27,524
And1: 15,354
Joined: Jul 22, 2005
Location: Billerica, MA
       

 

Post#7 » by celticfan42487 » Sun Jan 20, 2008 7:58 pm

Depends if IND remebers what Vince Carter does on teams that are lottery bound if this should even be considered as a proposal.

Wince out and trade for nothing.

That said without VC in NJ there's no reason to trade for J'Oneal.

VC taken over in the playoffs, helping the other two with playmaking for them... and with J'Oneal and Kidd's defense is the only way their going to be great.

I don't see Richard Jefferson with that type of capability.
Image
a-rod
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,778
And1: 21
Joined: Aug 12, 2006
Location: Rest In Peace Dad
Contact:
       

 

Post#8 » by a-rod » Sun Jan 20, 2008 8:02 pm

jeremy1215 wrote:Pacers do this even without Marcus Williams.
pillwenney wrote:
SacKingZZZ wrote:No thanks to Deng. I read a rumor surfing hoopshype awhile back saying Gay for Reke is a possibility.


Must be true, if it's a rumor you read on Hoopshype.
:rofl:
risktaker91
Banned User
Posts: 2,487
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 18, 2007

 

Post#9 » by risktaker91 » Sun Jan 20, 2008 8:05 pm

That's a great trade for the Pacers.
jzmagik
Banned User
Posts: 5,528
And1: 0
Joined: May 06, 2005
Location: NYC

 

Post#10 » by jzmagik » Sun Jan 20, 2008 8:05 pm

Hell no for NJ
Silk Wilkes
Banned User
Posts: 10,533
And1: 10
Joined: Aug 28, 2004
Location: In between a pimp and a hard place

 

Post#11 » by Silk Wilkes » Sun Jan 20, 2008 8:07 pm

It won't help them win the division. At least Vince is better than most of the shooting guards in the division. JO can't match up with either one of Bosh or Garnett anymore, not even Zach Randolph. It's all about match-ups. However, I'll take JO over VC if he's gonna be with J-Kidd as a big-3 for the Eastern Conference in general. Indiana is gonna be pissed with what they get in the long term though, trust me.

EDIT: Indiana is basically gonna be doing a JO for Marcus Williams deal.
User avatar
galeon110
Analyst
Posts: 3,532
And1: 631
Joined: Jul 27, 2006
Location: Toronto

 

Post#12 » by galeon110 » Sun Jan 20, 2008 8:08 pm

JO is definitely worth VC straight up.This trade's a rip off for the Nets.
Image
User avatar
HumbleBumbleBee
Analyst
Posts: 3,486
And1: 3
Joined: Apr 18, 2007
Location: The city the world calls home

 

Post#13 » by HumbleBumbleBee » Sun Jan 20, 2008 8:47 pm

galeon110 wrote:JO is definitely worth VC straight up.This trade's a rip off for the Nets.


In that cause...I'm for it!
are their contracts similar? i know VC's is pretty back loaded
Got Raps FanFiction?
Mad Balla 15
RealGM
Posts: 10,401
And1: 1,932
Joined: Nov 16, 2003

 

Post#14 » by Mad Balla 15 » Sun Jan 20, 2008 9:09 pm

celticfan42487 wrote:Depends if IND remebers what Vince Carter does on teams that are lottery bound if this should even be considered as a proposal.

Wince out and trade for nothing.

That said without VC in NJ there's no reason to trade for J'Oneal.

VC taken over in the playoffs, helping the other two with playmaking for them... and with J'Oneal and Kidd's defense is the only way their going to be great.

I don't see Richard Jefferson with that type of capability.


Oh really? Is that why he almost single-handedly, with some help from Kidd, led the 7-15 lottery bound Nets to the playoffs once he got traded there? Oh not to mention that he played 8 games with RJ that year before RJ went out for the year and returned for the playoffs. Their starting lineup and bench consisted of players such as: Jacque Vaughn, Jason Collins, Cliff Robinson, Ron Mercer, Travis Best, Rodney Buford, Jabari Smith, Zoran Planinic etc. From those players that played in their rotation that year only 2 of them are still in the NBA.
User avatar
Kobay
General Manager
Posts: 9,404
And1: 5
Joined: May 01, 2007

 

Post#15 » by Kobay » Sun Jan 20, 2008 9:17 pm

What will the cap for nets when JO expires after next year if the trade happened?
NetsForce
Banned User
Posts: 20,711
And1: 29
Joined: Dec 27, 2006

 

Post#16 » by NetsForce » Sun Jan 20, 2008 9:30 pm

Vince Carter:
2007-2008: $13,350,000
2008-2009: $14,750,000
2009-2010: $16,150,000
2010-2011: $17,500,000
2011-2012: $18,000,000 (Team Option)

Jermaine O'Neal:
2007-2008: $19,710,000
2008-2009: $21,352,500
2009-2010: $22,995,000
jeremy1215
Banned User
Posts: 3,434
And1: 4
Joined: May 31, 2007

 

Post#17 » by jeremy1215 » Sun Jan 20, 2008 9:52 pm

O'Neal has an opt out option at the end of the year I believe, but he won't because he won't get that much money off free agency.
User avatar
kidd0701
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,677
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 23, 2004

 

Post#18 » by kidd0701 » Sun Jan 20, 2008 10:29 pm

If Jermaine was healthy, then I'd consider it as the Nets. However, He is not even close to healthy. VC, people may not like him but he still is a very good player who puts up 20+ a night and creates shots for Boone and S.Williams.
telele
Junior
Posts: 423
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 24, 2004
Location: Maryland

 

Post#19 » by telele » Sun Jan 20, 2008 11:04 pm

Oneal has not proven anything the last 2 years while VC still has been a 25,5,5 player almost is whole career even though he's playing catch up this year from a weak start but he's playing in the system so VC's values is much better then Oneal's. **** I would do a Kristic and boone + for Oneal but not for any of our Big 3 he has not done crap the last few years. I would rather take the chances on Shaq from the so what rumors I've seen on the board he would be a better risk only if we keep VC and Kidd.
yunggunz
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,098
And1: 1
Joined: Sep 21, 2005

 

Post#20 » by yunggunz » Sun Jan 20, 2008 11:19 pm

If I am the Nets I trade VC for a big man that expires next year.

Return to The General Board