jzmagik wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
It's not like Tmac had a supporting cast either, but everyone faulted him for being unable to get them out of the first round in Orlando. But it's ok with Wade?
Ummmm......Wade has a ring?
Moderators: bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, ken6199, infinite11285, Clav, Dirk
jzmagik wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
It's not like Tmac had a supporting cast either, but everyone faulted him for being unable to get them out of the first round in Orlando. But it's ok with Wade?
Griever24 wrote:We know he can do it with a good cast around him and hof's but what about on a bad team ? KG has showed it in good and bad teams .. AI has showed it in good and bad teams .. Kobe showed it on his old good squad and these past years with his new bad squad ...
Wade is not showing it .. though it is a young Career i never believed he had it in the first place with all the Free-throw attempts and ridiculous calls he recieved ... which is what has led me to believe he is over-rated sometimes
Griever24 wrote:We know he can do it with a good cast around him and hof's but what about on a bad team ? KG has showed it in good and bad teams .. AI has showed it in good and bad teams .. Kobe showed it on his old good squad and these past years with his new bad squad ...
Wade is not showing it .. though it is a young Career i never believed he had it in the first place with all the Free-throw attempts and ridiculous calls he recieved ... which is what has led me to believe he is over-rated sometimes
Induveca wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
That is complete and utter bull. You don't do 180s flying into traffic, trying to slam the ball down "hobbled". You don't dribble through traffic like a madman breaking ankles "hobbled".
The guy is fine. You're just making excuses. Things are simple in Miami right now. Wade can't carry a team. Even if he was "hobbled", the dominant superstar you guys are describing as Wade should be able to squeak out 2-3 wins in a 13 game stretch (14 as of tomorrow when LeBron James and his cast of misfits win).
Seriously, look back at history. Do you think the Iverson of 2001/2002 or the LeBron of last year run this same Miami squad to 13 straight losses? You give Wade the credit for the championship, so he should take the blame for the losses no? Or would you like to come to my more logical side, the side i've maintained all along as a lifetime NBA fan and admit Shaq's presence decides games. His dominant presence of 2 years ago drove Miami over the top and straight to the ring. Now that he's old, basically finished as a dominant player......so are the Heat.
Be realistic. You put Arenas/Redd/T-Mac/Kobe/Pierce/Anthony/Iverson alongside Shaq two years ago and they make the Finals as well. Take Shaq off the team and NONE of them make it........
Harry Heinous wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
The Heat were 1-13 before Wade came back this year.
And don't you think that maybe, just maybe it might be that Wade is just not himself right now because of injuries? Because I do, and I have watched every Heat game this year. Have you?
kbitboc wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Like I said...his longest losing streak is 8. Lebron is 7 and Wade is 12 and counting.
Harry Heinous wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Be warned, I'm using your logic: Why couldn't Kobe do it in 03-04 with 4 hofs on his team?
Griever24 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
he did it three times before that and what can i say Detroit outplayed us and Kobe tried to take over to much that series im not gonna sugar coat it ...
04-05 was horrible but injuries to Odom and Coach leaving .. no excuse right ? your right but he didnt let 13 slip .. and he bounced back and showed why he is arguebly the best or most talented the next 2 years with virtually no one .. Kwame luke and smush were starters is that enough .. but this is not about Kobe so dont try to change
circushots wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Watch a game for me, will you? Then come back and tell me that the man is healthy. Because if you're not even going to agree that he's injured, while even others who argue against me can at least admit that he is, then there's no point in having this conversation. Look, the point is that this team even with a healthy Wade is not going to make huge noise in the standings or playoffs; their roster is awful. But to put the blame on a player who is out there playing injured is plain ignorant. And I'm not even putting Wade up against Tmac right now, because his roster back then was god awful too.
As a "lifetime NBA fan", how can you even suggest that the players you listed would get to the finals with Shaq? Are you seriously with a straight face suggesting that Michael freaking Redd would be enough to make the Heat a contender? And meanwhile have the gall to tell us to "be realistic"?
Wait, I'm starting to think that you didn't even watch the finals two years ago. You couldn't have, because even the biggest Wade hater would agree that it was primarily his play which won them the chip. (I can't believe I even have to state this explicitly) Newsflash, Shaq was already old two years ago. He was certainly a better playerthan he is today, but no one would confuse him with an even closer to prime Shaq. There were many crucial junctures in games where Riley played Zo as he was much more effective in there. No one is denying that Shaq demands attention, but to suggest that he was the primary focus of the defense is ridiculous.
Two problems here. People have unbelievably short memories, and even worse people go back into time and distort the facts to please themselves.

Criticism is fine, I don't think you're finding anyone here saying otherwise given the situation.Cevap wrote:the thing about the NBA is that the best player gets the most praise when the team wins and the most criticism when the team loses. Heat fans were always quick on the draw, when comparing wade to other players, by mentioning his 40 ppg in the finals. Well now when his team is not doing well, other fans will come and bring this rough stretch up whenever they have a chance. Learn to deal with it heat fans, it's just the way this board works
Mars wrote:You can't stop the asterisk... you can only hope to contain it.
xcomputerman wrote:Typical RealGM thread. Lots of mindless bashing, every poster feels like he much discredit player X in order to give love for his favorite player Y.
It's funny how hypocritical Wade fans have suddenly become now that someone brought up the fact that he is losing just like McGrady was back in Orlando. I'm a fan of both players myself, and I have all the respect in the world for Wade after his finals performance and also hearing of the way he comports himself off-court. But basketball is a team sport, and single superstars by themselves don't win titles. The 2006 Miami team caught lightning in a bottle, with Shaq still his dominating self, a strong supporting cast and championship-type defense. The credit goes to the entire team.
One could even bring Kobe up in this situation. Look at the past few years - ever since he and Shaq were separated he hasn't been able to "carry" his team past the first round either. But of course, you won't see people making such ridiculous statements as "Kobe is not a superstar" now, would you?
It's the superstar's burden to do as much as he can to carry his team to glory. But they never, ever succeed by doing it alone. In McGrady's case, he just has never been fortunate enough to have good enough teammates around him to enjoy playoff success. The others have seen their stock fall as their teams fell apart. If you want to see some numbers that'll make your head spin, check out David Berri's blog at WagesOfWins (dberri.wordpress.com) where he compares Bryant and McGrady's careers and concludes that while Bryant has been a slightly better scorer, he has had a far superior supporting cast and that if they were to theoretically switch teammates, McGrady would have had even greater success.
I'm not going to make a case for any one player over the other. McGrady, Bryant and Wade are great players in their own right. But in a league that loves to glorify individual accomplishment, it is still the best teams that win.
Griever24 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
He Carried them to the playoffs not to mention almost upset the suns in this tough Western Conference
Going by your logic why dont we put Kobe on T Mac's team that seems to do well without him ? Guarente you they contend for the chip or take it all the way .. Heck even put Wade on T Macs team and they are probaly instand Contenders ..
at least wade will play through injuries.

You totally dismissed the thoughts, and therefore made your own and are therefore wrong for it. -- There's no one individual totally dismissing Shaq as a key cog in the Heat's success (or demise).Datruth345 wrote:i can't believe heat fans totally dismissing the Shaq factor..that is ridiculous
...in the first few pages at least i didn't read all 17
Mars wrote:You can't stop the asterisk... you can only hope to contain it.