NY/LA- Zach to Lakers

Moderators: pacers33granger, BullyKing, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, Andre Roberstan, MoneyTalks41890, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat

User avatar
FutureKnicksGM
Head Coach
Posts: 6,933
And1: 1,505
Joined: Sep 26, 2005
 

NY/LA- Zach to Lakers 

Post#1 » by FutureKnicksGM » Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:02 pm

Zach Randolph
for
Kwame Brown, Sasha Vujacic, 2008 first (top 10 protected), LA 08 second


Knicks would then waive Vujacic, who can then be claimed on waivers by LA (If they can do that).

LA(healthy):
Bynum/Turiaf/Mihm
Zach/Walton
Odom/Ariza/Vlad
Kobe/Vujacic/Javaris
Fisher/Farmer

Lakers get a legit 20-10 presence to help Kobe with all the injuries LA have. Zach would thrive in a role where he can be the 2nd option after Kobe. But even when Bynum comes back, Zach can play along side him as Bynum's shotblocking can help cover Zach on the defensive end. LA become legit contenders.

Knicks get an expiring, a late first and a late second.

NY
User avatar
omeloon
Starter
Posts: 2,250
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 15, 2004

 

Post#2 » by omeloon » Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:09 pm

Decent enough deal. I'd like to think LA would definitely do it, but who knows.

Would hope NY could get a bit more, but I think they'd still be happy with the fact that they traded away Francis' contract w/ out adding any crap. If the Knicks could re-sign Kwame for the MLE, this trade could look very positive for them. Kwame's a decent enough defender, so could look great splitting time with Lee and playing alongside scorer Curry
Image
User avatar
hermes
RealGM
Posts: 97,303
And1: 25,821
Joined: Aug 27, 2007
Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
 

 

Post#3 » by hermes » Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:12 pm

i'd like to think that zach's value is higher than that but maybe not
warriorfan650
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 5,964
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 05, 2004
Location: Golden State

 

Post#4 » by warriorfan650 » Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:25 pm

Problem with this deal, despite all the differences in talent level, is that LA would be left with no center after this deal while Bynum and Mihm heal.
User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 56,682
And1: 24,004
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

 

Post#5 » by dockingsched » Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:34 pm

hermes wrote:i'd like to think that zach's value is higher than that but maybe not


higher than expiring contracts and a first round pick? his value lower, much lower.
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
legacyinthemakin89c
Veteran
Posts: 2,674
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 02, 2006

 

Post#6 » by legacyinthemakin89c » Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:45 pm

Yeah to be honest, I say Lakers turn it down, Zach's a curse.
CableKC
RealGM
Posts: 26,160
And1: 13,242
Joined: Aug 20, 2003
Location: Conseco FieldHouse, the house that Reggie built

 

Post#7 » by CableKC » Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:47 pm

From a casual observer of the Lakers, the only reasons I could think of why they would not want Zach is because of the $60 mil that he is owed and concerns about whether he's a team player or not.

Other then that ( which are legit reasons ).....I don't think that paying an Expiring Contract, filler and a likely mid-20s 1st round pick is that much for a legit 17/10 PF.

The only way that I can think of that would be fair would be to take out Sasha and add in VladRad just to make the $$$ owed more balenced.
- In 2026 and 2028, you are not voting for a "Democrat" or "Republican". You are voting for the Party that will defend Democracy and protect the most vulnerable among us.

#THE_GOP_IS_DEAD
#IT_IS_THE_PARTY_OF_TRUMP_NOW
NetsForce
Banned User
Posts: 20,711
And1: 30
Joined: Dec 27, 2006

 

Post#8 » by NetsForce » Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:49 pm

Zach Randolph is one of the last players you'd want to have in the Triangle.

I really don't know how else to put it.

Return to Trades and Transactions