ImageImage

Bucks, time to tank?

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

User avatar
dunleavyjr
General Manager
Posts: 8,841
And1: 54
Joined: Dec 06, 2002
Location: Turning 24

Bucks, time to tank? 

Post#1 » by dunleavyjr » Wed Jan 23, 2008 8:12 am

Bucks are not going to this year's playoff. So isn't it time to develop young players?

I would give guys like Bogut, Yi heavy minutes. They are the future of this Bucks team. Let them play together for better chemistry.

Follow Portland's foot step.
User avatar
howe070523
Pro Prospect
Posts: 866
And1: 6
Joined: Aug 31, 2007

Re: Bucks, time to tank? 

Post#2 » by howe070523 » Wed Jan 23, 2008 8:24 am

dunleavyjr wrote:
Follow Portland's foot step.


Co-Signed.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,684
And1: 27,268
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

 

Post#3 » by trwi7 » Wed Jan 23, 2008 8:26 am

What I *really* think we should do is trade for Sam Cassell.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
bayrdbandit
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,770
And1: 1
Joined: Dec 13, 2006
Location: Melbourne

Re: Bucks, time to tank? 

Post#4 » by bayrdbandit » Wed Jan 23, 2008 9:04 am

dunleavyjr wrote:I would give guys like Bogut, Yi heavy minutes. They are the future of this Bucks team. Let them play together for better chemistry.


and this is different how?
User avatar
dunleavyjr
General Manager
Posts: 8,841
And1: 54
Joined: Dec 06, 2002
Location: Turning 24

 

Post#5 » by dunleavyjr » Wed Jan 23, 2008 9:05 am

trwi7 wrote:What I *really* think we should do is trade for Sam Cassell.


That would be going against the direction of re-building.
Say no to the 1-million year old alien.
User avatar
howe070523
Pro Prospect
Posts: 866
And1: 6
Joined: Aug 31, 2007

 

Post#6 » by howe070523 » Wed Jan 23, 2008 9:17 am

1.Hire JVG
2.Hire T.Thebodeau as Bogut's trainer at all cost
3.Hire a personal trainer for Yi.
Thats all I can think of at the moment.
NeedsMoreCheese
RealGM
Posts: 43,042
And1: 8,369
Joined: Apr 22, 2002
   

 

Post#7 » by NeedsMoreCheese » Wed Jan 23, 2008 9:21 am

Why is this fruit basket always over here trolling?
MilBucksBackOnTop06
Banned User
Posts: 12,827
And1: 14
Joined: Nov 10, 2005

 

Post#8 » by MilBucksBackOnTop06 » Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:34 pm

:noway:

:roll: Here we go...here we go with this tanking crapola! :banghead:

Unreal. :sigh:

You knew it was coming ...and here we are in mid January.

Unbelivable...:noway: Brewers spring training cannot come fast enough.

:thinking:
User avatar
smauss
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,733
And1: 432
Joined: Jul 23, 2005
Contact:
     

 

Post#9 » by smauss » Wed Jan 23, 2008 1:58 pm

So by "tanking" you mean for MORE than quarter per game?
"Too many people ask for help, and sometimes you have to help yourself." - Jerry Sloan (CBQ is missed)

simul justus et peccator
User avatar
europa
RealGM
Posts: 44,919
And1: 471
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
Location: Right Behind You

 

Post#10 » by europa » Wed Jan 23, 2008 2:30 pm

Help me remember - what good did tanking do last year?
Nothing will not break me.
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,752
And1: 6,957
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

 

Post#11 » by LUKE23 » Wed Jan 23, 2008 2:46 pm

There are two spectrums in the NBA, you're either in the playoffs or you're in the lottery. If you're not in the playoffs, it obviously does very little good in regards to helping the future of your franchise to be just outside the playoff bracket. Therefore, if we're not going to make the playoffs (we're not) I'd rather have us really suck the rest of the year. Yes, it doesn't guarantee anything, but the chances are much better.

And it was the difference between Yi (who will be a top 4 player in this draft) and a scrub last year, so I will argue that it does matter.

The other point I will make is that the more games we lose this year, the higher chance of change with regards to this teams core and philosophy in the offseason. I want absolutely no reason for management or ownership to try and rationalize this core coming back.
User avatar
europa
RealGM
Posts: 44,919
And1: 471
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
Location: Right Behind You

 

Post#12 » by europa » Wed Jan 23, 2008 2:50 pm

I like Yi and I think he'll be a good player but frankly I'm sick of tanking. Twice in the last three years is enough. I'm sick of trips to the lottery and never going anywhere. I've just had enough of the endless cycle the Bucks remain mired in.
Nothing will not break me.
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,752
And1: 6,957
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

 

Post#13 » by LUKE23 » Wed Jan 23, 2008 2:52 pm

europa wrote:I like Yi and I think he'll be a good player but frankly I'm sick of tanking. Twice in the last three years is enough. I'm sick of trips to the lottery and never going anywhere. I've just had enough of the endless cycle the Bucks remain mired in.


Agreed. But we're not going to make the plaoyffs europa. It's better for the future of the team to have a better pick. Winning mid 30's in the NBA is literally the worst case scenario for any team, in my opinion. You're not in the playoffs and 95% of the time you also can't add a player that can really help you.
User avatar
europa
RealGM
Posts: 44,919
And1: 471
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
Location: Right Behind You

 

Post#14 » by europa » Wed Jan 23, 2008 2:54 pm

I never at any time believed this was a playoff team. Given the moves that were made last summer (or lack thereof) I've always believed unfortunately that the Bucks were headed to the lottery again. I'm just sick of banking on the lottery year after year after year. Look at the Hawks. It took them eight years before they finally started showing signs of life despite yearly trips to the lottery. I'm just tired of wasting season after season and hoping that one night in June provides all the answers and reasons for optimism.
Nothing will not break me.
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,752
And1: 6,957
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

 

Post#15 » by LUKE23 » Wed Jan 23, 2008 2:55 pm

europa wrote:I never at any time believed this was a playoff team. Given the moves that were made last summer (or lack thereof) I've always believed unfortunately that the Bucks were headed to the lottery again. I'm just sick of banking on the lottery year after year after year. Look at the Hawks. It took them eight years before they finally started showing signs of life despite yearly trips to the lottery. I'm just tired of wasting season after season and hoping that one night in June provides all the answers and reasons for optimism.


I'm sick of it as well, I'm just stating what is best for this organization as of today given the state of affairs. More losses means a better pick and a better chance of change. If they go on a huge run here in the second half and barely miss the playoffs, I think it would be a nightmare.
User avatar
InsideOut
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,757
And1: 535
Joined: Aug 22, 2006

 

Post#16 » by InsideOut » Wed Jan 23, 2008 4:07 pm

LUKE23 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I'm sick of it as well, I'm just stating what is best for this organization as of today given the state of affairs. More losses means a better pick and a better chance of change. If they go on a huge run here in the second half and barely miss the playoffs, I think it would be a nightmare.


This is just pure common sense. If your not in the playoffs do you want a 25% (?) at the number 1 pick or a 1% (?) chance? And if you don't win a top 3 pick in the lottery do you want your worse case scenario to be picking 4th or 13th? As far as what tanking got us last season...we picked 6th instead of 14th. While you can end up with a better player at 14th I think we'd agree that it is still better to draft 6th.

Could the anti-tankers please explain how the Bucks should acquire the talent to contend if not through the draft? As was mentioned, you either want to be good and in the playoffs or stink and get high picks. Finishing with 39 wins year after year and picking 12-14 is no way to build a team. And while sucking hasn't worked in the past for teams like the Hawks or Clippers does that mean it's a bad plan to tank or does it mean those teams are run by idiots that have no clue how to draft or build a team?
Bucks_Revenge
Banned User
Posts: 7,978
And1: 1
Joined: Oct 13, 2004

 

Post#17 » by Bucks_Revenge » Wed Jan 23, 2008 4:10 pm

europa wrote:Help me remember - what good did tanking do last year?




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pd-VUoA4z4
User avatar
europa
RealGM
Posts: 44,919
And1: 471
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
Location: Right Behind You

 

Post#18 » by europa » Wed Jan 23, 2008 4:12 pm

Why do tanking or finishing at 39 wins year after year have to be the only options? Why can't there be an option where the Bucks make the playoffs and then add the right pieces while gradually improving and going from a playoff team to a legitimate contender? I'd much prefer that option to wasting season after season in the lottery and hoping that maybe next year's trip to the lottery will be the one that really puts the team over the top.
Nothing will not break me.
midranger
RealGM
Posts: 39,420
And1: 11,225
Joined: May 12, 2002

 

Post#19 » by midranger » Wed Jan 23, 2008 4:12 pm

InsideOut wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



This is just pure common sense. If your not in the playoffs do you want a 25% (?) at the number 1 pick or a 1% (?) chance? And if you don't win a top 3 pick in the lottery do you want your worse case scenario to be picking 4th or 13th? As far as what tanking got us last season...we picked 6th instead of 14th. While you can end up with a better player at 14th I think we'd agree that it is still better to draft 6th.

Could the anti-tankers please explain how the Bucks should acquire the talent to contend if not through the draft? As was mentioned, you either want to be good and in the playoffs or stink and get high picks. Finishing with 39 wins year after year and picking 12-14 is no way to build a team. And while sucking hasn't worked in the past for teams like the Hawks or Clippers does that mean it's a bad plan to tank or does it mean those teams are run by idiots that have no clue how to draft or build a team?


We should make trades that send out our crap for a productive player. Oh wait, they hate that too.
Bucks_Revenge
Banned User
Posts: 7,978
And1: 1
Joined: Oct 13, 2004

 

Post#20 » by Bucks_Revenge » Wed Jan 23, 2008 4:13 pm

MD and PP you guys should ban who ever makes a thread about tanking only idiots and not true fans say tank......having the worse record doesn't mean nothing it's like last year has taught you guys nothing ...so sad.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks


cron