Get the Kings a decent PF

Moderators: pacers33granger, BullyKing, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, Andre Roberstan, MoneyTalks41890, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat

User avatar
ThiZZ
Junior
Posts: 465
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 13, 2005

Get the Kings a decent PF 

Post#1 » by ThiZZ » Wed Jan 23, 2008 9:47 am

im not talking a stud! a 10/10 type of guy... david lee comes to mind....

available players

Ron Artest
Mike Bibby
K Thomas
F Garcia

make it happen!
Oomph
Veteran
Posts: 2,651
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 30, 2005

Re: Get the Kings a decent PF 

Post#2 » by Oomph » Wed Jan 23, 2008 2:09 pm

ThiZZ wrote:im not talking a stud! a 10/10 type of guy... david lee comes to mind....

available players

Ron Artest
Mike Bibby
K Thomas
F Garcia

make it happen!


Bibby/Thomas/Garcia for Murphy/Tinsley/Daniels?
legacyinthemakin89c
Veteran
Posts: 2,674
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 02, 2006

 

Post#3 » by legacyinthemakin89c » Wed Jan 23, 2008 2:19 pm

Ron Artest, Shareef and Kenny Thomas for Zach Randolph, Jared Jeffiries and Renaldo Balkman

Why for Sac: They get a 20/10 power forward and a decent replacement for Artest. The best thing is, is that they finally get rid of Kenny Thomas.

Why for NYK: Theyh balance their team out. David Lee starts next to Curry and Artest starts, that lineup is so much better defensively, and Curry will play better, being the main threat in the offensive post.

Sac Lineup:
Bibby/Udrih
Martin/Salmons
Garcia/Balkman
Randolph/Moore
Miller/Hawes

Nyk lineup:
Marbury/Robinson
Crawford/Jones
Artest/Richardson
Lee/Shareef
Curry/Rose

Both teams improve considerably.
gswhoops
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 34,836
And1: 6,549
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
   

Re: Get the Kings a decent PF 

Post#4 » by gswhoops » Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:09 pm

Oomph wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Bibby/Thomas/Garcia for Murphy/Tinsley/Daniels?

I think Bibby is really overrated by some Kings fans but this is seriously beyond bad.
Smills91
Banned User
Posts: 23,364
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Location: Ronald Reagan is my political hero.

 

Post#5 » by Smills91 » Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:15 pm

legacyinthemakin89c wrote:Ron Artest, Shareef and Kenny Thomas for Zach Randolph, Jared Jeffiries and Renaldo Balkman

Why for Sac: They get a 20/10 power forward and a decent replacement for Artest. The best thing is, is that they finally get rid of Kenny Thomas.

Why for NYK: Theyh balance their team out. David Lee starts next to Curry and Artest starts, that lineup is so much better defensively, and Curry will play better, being the main threat in the offensive post.

Sac Lineup:
Bibby/Udrih
Martin/Salmons
Garcia/Balkman
Randolph/Moore
Miller/Hawes

Nyk lineup:
Marbury/Robinson
Crawford/Jones
Artest/Richardson
Lee/Shareef
Curry/Rose

Both teams improve considerably.


Where's the decent PF that the OP talks about. It's surely not the awful contract of Zach Randolph. He's TERRIBLE. Nothing more than a stat-padding, no defense whatsoever cream puff.
User avatar
zong
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,290
And1: 102
Joined: Sep 27, 2007
Location: Toronto
       

 

Post#6 » by zong » Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:39 pm

Smills91 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Where's the decent PF that the OP talks about. It's surely not the awful contract of Zach Randolph. He's TERRIBLE. Nothing more than a stat-padding, no defense whatsoever cream puff.


you're not saying hes worse than KT/Shareef are you? :rofl:
legacyinthemakin89c
Veteran
Posts: 2,674
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 02, 2006

 

Post#7 » by legacyinthemakin89c » Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:40 pm

Smills91 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Where's the decent PF that the OP talks about. It's surely not the awful contract of Zach Randolph. He's TERRIBLE. Nothing more than a stat-padding, no defense whatsoever cream puff.


Randolph is decent enough given what the Knicks get back. You finally get out of Kenny Thomas' contract, and Shareef's, and add a young power forward, who has never, ever been put into a good situation. He has always been around bad character guys and wavering franchises.

Randolph has shown he wants to just play basketball or else he wouldn't have worked so hard to come back from microfracture surgery. Give the guy a chance in a good character setting, and nobody knows exactly how he'll respond.

Artest will most likely leave the Kings in a year to play for a contender, and Balkman is a decent replacement to backup for Garcia, and given Artest's problems, its fair value for both sides.
User avatar
WarFan
RealGM
Posts: 14,042
And1: 1,508
Joined: Jul 30, 2007
Location: Aptos, CA
     

 

Post#8 » by WarFan » Wed Jan 23, 2008 4:01 pm

zong wrote:you're not saying hes worse than KT/Shareef are you? :rofl:

No, he said where's the quality PF.

KT and SAR make about as much per year combined as Z-Bo, who has a longer contract. I wouldn't want any of them on my team, so shorter contracts FTW.
eitanr
General Manager
Posts: 8,460
And1: 332
Joined: Nov 26, 2003

 

Post#9 » by eitanr » Wed Jan 23, 2008 4:11 pm

I like that Knicks deal. The Kings rid themselves of 2 contracts which are unmoveable and at least get a post presence who will stick a round for a while.

In all honesty though, if I'm Sacto I just look to the future and perhaps try drafting a PF or trading up for one. A possibility could also be drafting a guy like Hibbert as well.
Read the best NBA Articles on the Web right here, delivering innovative insights and a unique perspectives on all the happenings of the league.

http://fullcourtanalytics.blogspot.com/
User avatar
hermes
RealGM
Posts: 97,302
And1: 25,820
Joined: Aug 27, 2007
Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
 

 

Post#10 » by hermes » Wed Jan 23, 2008 4:35 pm

what about kwame
he had a 10/10 game a while back
rpa
RealGM
Posts: 15,085
And1: 7,902
Joined: Nov 24, 2006

 

Post#11 » by rpa » Wed Jan 23, 2008 4:45 pm

legacyinthemakin89c wrote:Randolph is decent enough given what the Knicks get back. You finally get out of Kenny Thomas' contract, and Shareef's, and add a young power forward, who has never, ever been put into a good situation. He has always been around bad character guys and wavering franchises.


And add 1 that's equally as bad as either of those 2 deals.

The Kings neither need nor want Randolph. The reason Moore is seeing minutes is because he:
a) plays good, solid defense
b) isn't afraid to do the dirty work
c) doesn't need the ball at all

Randolph is pretty much the exact opposite of all 3 of these things. Ideally the Kings could get a [much] better version of Mikki Moore (preferably someone who can protect the basket). Randolph is not that guy AT ALL
User avatar
HeavyP
Starter
Posts: 2,072
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 22, 2003
Location: Bonney Lake, Washington
Contact:
     

 

Post#12 » by HeavyP » Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:30 pm

Delonte West, Earl Watson, Chris Wilcox?
legacyinthemakin89c
Veteran
Posts: 2,674
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 02, 2006

 

Post#13 » by legacyinthemakin89c » Wed Jan 23, 2008 6:10 pm

rpa wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



And add 1 that's equally as bad as either of those 2 deals.

The Kings neither need nor want Randolph. The reason Moore is seeing minutes is because he:
a) plays good, solid defense
b) isn't afraid to do the dirty work
c) doesn't need the ball at all

Randolph is pretty much the exact opposite of all 3 of these things. Ideally the Kings could get a [much] better version of Mikki Moore (preferably someone who can protect the basket). Randolph is not that guy AT ALL


Ok then who can they who can they get, enlighten me?
Smills91
Banned User
Posts: 23,364
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Location: Ronald Reagan is my political hero.

 

Post#14 » by Smills91 » Wed Jan 23, 2008 6:36 pm

zong wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



you're not saying hes worse than KT/Shareef are you? :rofl:


I'd rather have KT/Shareef because they're less expensive and expire a year sooner. And neither is a CANCER to boot.
legacyinthemakin89c
Veteran
Posts: 2,674
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 02, 2006

 

Post#15 » by legacyinthemakin89c » Wed Jan 23, 2008 6:41 pm

Then just let them expire, because the Kings aren't going to compete for a playoff spot the next few years, so just hold onto the contracts, live through some painful years, draft well, sign some free agents and make a run for the playoffs.
User avatar
Baddy Chuck
RealGM
Posts: 51,534
And1: 25,753
Joined: Apr 18, 2006
 

 

Post#16 » by Baddy Chuck » Wed Jan 23, 2008 6:41 pm

Charlie Villanueva? Hes not a great defensive player but he is actually a pretty good rebounder and we all know he can score.
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
Smills91
Banned User
Posts: 23,364
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Location: Ronald Reagan is my political hero.

 

Post#17 » by Smills91 » Wed Jan 23, 2008 7:07 pm

legacyinthemakin89c wrote:Then just let them expire, because the Kings aren't going to compete for a playoff spot the next few years, so just hold onto the contracts, live through some painful years, draft well, sign some free agents and make a run for the playoffs.


Not calling you out, but I can't wait until May when the Kings are in the playoffs.
User avatar
Bac2Basics
RealGM
Posts: 13,588
And1: 3
Joined: Mar 03, 2001
Location: "Are you like a crazy person? I'm quite sure they will say so."
   

 

Post#18 » by Bac2Basics » Wed Jan 23, 2008 7:41 pm

Actually I'm at the point where I hope that the Kings don't make the playoffs.

Being a 7 or 8 seed again and likely losing in the first round does little if anything for the Kings longterm plans even though it would make a pretty good story concidering the injuries that the team had so far this season.

As far as any of these PF deal, I'm not particularly impressed with any of them. Troy Murphy & Zach Randolph have contracts far to big for a team that's supposed to be rebuilding. Kwame's value is really only as an expiring and even some Laker fans would admit that.

I guess Wilcox or Charlie V might be interesting but my guess is that the Kings would have to pay too much for either one of them.
User avatar
spidythejoe
Rookie
Posts: 1,034
And1: 81
Joined: Aug 08, 2007

 

Post#19 » by spidythejoe » Wed Jan 23, 2008 8:38 pm

Francisco Garcia for Ike Diogu. Both terms give up value to address a need.
legacyinthemakin89c
Veteran
Posts: 2,674
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 02, 2006

 

Post#20 » by legacyinthemakin89c » Wed Jan 23, 2008 8:42 pm

Smills91 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Not calling you out, but I can't wait until May when the Kings are in the playoffs.


Over who?

They are the 11th best team in the west right now. (in no particular order)

San Antonio
Dallas
Phoenix
New Orleans
Utah
Houston
Los Angeles
Golden State
Portland
Denver

Then Sacramento

All of those teams have more talent on their rosters and a logical/reasonable nba fan can't think the Kings are going to overtake any of them to make the playoffs.

And you said in May, so you think the Kings are going to make it to the 2nd round? Not to call you out or anything, but your delusional.

Return to Trades and Transactions