Sacramento (18-22) at LA Clippers (12-25)
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,778
- And1: 21
- Joined: Aug 12, 2006
- Location: Rest In Peace Dad
- Contact:
-
i will give them the benefit of the doubt mainly because their playing on back to back, and nobody in the NBA has a waining record on back to back games.
pillwenney wrote:SacKingZZZ wrote:No thanks to Deng. I read a rumor surfing hoopshype awhile back saying Gay for Reke is a possibility.
Must be true, if it's a rumor you read on Hoopshype.

- UKF
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,810
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jan 05, 2006
- Contact:
Yea that game was a downer.. I figured since we smashed the Nets last night we wouldnt be affected as much because of the back-to-back...Well I thought wrong. Nobody could really get it going. Not the rythym that I expected. Kevin only made 3 shots and we couldnt make free throws. We shall see what happens in Utah, I wouldnt relaly say that Im looking forward to it after what I saw tonight.
We REALLY need a man on the low post that can defend. C'mon Peach!
Thornton>Hawes
We REALLY need a man on the low post that can defend. C'mon Peach!
Thornton>Hawes

-
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,085
- And1: 1,084
- Joined: Feb 19, 2005
- Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,403
- And1: 0
- Joined: Sep 22, 2005
- Location: my house
ClipperDomination wrote:Good game tonight.
I was really impressed with Bibby at the beginning of the game. He looked like the Bibby of old.
Hey, at least you guys still have a better record than the Clipps.
Atleast the Clippers get Brand back and a good lottery pick next year. We're stuck in mediocrity because Petrie makes less moves than a freaking boulder.

- pillwenney
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 48,887
- And1: 2,603
- Joined: Sep 19, 2004
- Location: Avidly reading pstyousuck.blogspot.com/
- Contact:
-
Well I WAS really pissed out about having missed this game, but it looks like we just did absolutely nothing well. The only thing we did better than them was make 3's--in that we made 6 and they made 4....then again we took 20 and they took 7.
KIE is right. This is what happens when you're team has to rely on jumpshooting.

KIE is right. This is what happens when you're team has to rely on jumpshooting.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,085
- And1: 1,084
- Joined: Feb 19, 2005
- Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."
-
- Senior
- Posts: 725
- And1: 1
- Joined: Apr 29, 2007
.
Others have said it but it's worth repeting, when our outside game is not on, longer jumpshots, we are going to have trouble. Live by the outside jumpers and die by them as well.
In a case like last night when we our outside game was poor, we didn't or don't have a plan "B" that could/can make up for a off night in that major part of our game.
.
Others have said it but it's worth repeting, when our outside game is not on, longer jumpshots, we are going to have trouble. Live by the outside jumpers and die by them as well.
In a case like last night when we our outside game was poor, we didn't or don't have a plan "B" that could/can make up for a off night in that major part of our game.

.
-
- Forum Mod - Kings
- Posts: 25,434
- And1: 5,537
- Joined: Jul 28, 2006
-
Smills91 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
That's just silly talk, whenever we need REBOUNDING and D and Shot Blocking we should play Justin Williams...Kenny Thomas should NEVER see playing time as a Sacramento King again.
Thank you.
IMO everybody always put K9 down. True, when K9 step on the floor, a turnover will bound to happen BUT a lack of minutes could lead to that problem as well. We all know (Well, majority) K9's strengths are post D and rebounding. At least we should give him a chance to prove himself on court (Or garbage time) that he could be the same player from 2 years ago IMO....
The problem of playing Justin Williams is that he is basically a NON-factor on offense and he has a low B IQ, which limits his playing time IMO...
- pillwenney
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 48,887
- And1: 2,603
- Joined: Sep 19, 2004
- Location: Avidly reading pstyousuck.blogspot.com/
- Contact:
-
kingsfan10 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
IMO everybody always put K9 down. True, when K9 step on the floor, a turnover will bound to happen BUT a lack of minutes could lead to that problem as well. We all know (Well, majority) K9's strengths are post D and rebounding. At least we should give him a chance to prove himself on court (Or garbage time) that he could be the same player from 2 years ago IMO....
The problem of playing Justin Williams is that he is basically a NON-factor on offense and he has a low B IQ, which limits his playing time IMO...
Kenny got his chance earlier in the year. He looked terrible.
And Justin's problems are also Kenny's. And at this point in their careers, Justin's offense>>Kenny's. When Kenny goes in for a layup, it's as if he thinks he gets points for throwing the ball at the square above the rim as hard as he can. Justin, on the other hand, will dunk it.
-
- Forum Mod - Kings
- Posts: 25,434
- And1: 5,537
- Joined: Jul 28, 2006
-
mitchweber wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Kenny got his chance earlier in the year. He looked terrible.
And Justin's problems are also Kenny's. And at this point in their careers, Justin's offense>>Kenny's. When Kenny goes in for a layup, it's as if he thinks he gets points for throwing the ball at the square above the rim as hard as he can. Justin, on the other hand, will dunk it.
To be fair, K9 didnt really got a chance. His minutes were inconsistent...The most minutes he played is 30 minutes...And it varies from time to time i.e. 7/8 minutes per game... IMO the situation that he is in (Currently is inactive) well tell him to wake up and perform to the level from 2 years ago or close to it... I really missed K9 from years ago...He hustles his ass off, rebounded the ball, played great post D and etc...Too bad he was struck by that injury (Shoulder)...