Post#13 » by Rondo_Fan » Thu Jan 24, 2008 11:39 pm
Well, NY has more professional franchises than we do and they like to think that they win more than we do, but I think that you can argue that Boston is ahead in terms of championships per franchise per year. Maybe not, I don't know. I'm too lazy to research it thoroughly. But if you take the Yankees, Knicks, Jets, Giants, Rangers, and Islanders and put them up against the Red Sox, Pats, Celtics, and Bruins, which city has won more championships per franchise per year? I'm betting Boston, in spite of the Yankees 26 World championships.
The reason that New Yorkers love to talk about the Yankees, or the reason that they used to love to talk about them, before the Yankees became the most celebrated losers of all time in 2004, is that they held the Yankees forth as proof that New York was a winning town. If you take the Yankees out of the equation, then Boston KO's New York without question. But even if you leave the Yankees in, I'll bet Boston still comes out ahead. I'm willing to be proven wrong on this, if somebody wants to add up the numbers.
Now, it is true that Boston fans are a little bit more wrapped up in this than New York fans. But that's because Boston fans are (why not just come out and say it?) better fans than New York fans are. I'm not going to make NY fans out to be like Lakers fans who head for the parking lot during the third quarter, but NY fans definitely don't take things as seriously as Boston fans do, i.e., they are less "fanatical" than Boston fans, and worse fans (from "fanatics") of their teams than Boston fans are.
Maybe the average New Yorker is more well-rounded than the average Bostonian? Maybe New York fans don't need to care about their teams so much because they have the Broadway shows, and Wall Street, and the art galleries, etc.? It could be, but it's probably just that New Yorkers are lame.
Yabba-dabba-doo!