ImageImageImageImageImage

SAC/MIN

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,662
And1: 22,230
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

SAC/MIN 

Post#1 » by Klomp » Sat Jan 26, 2008 10:20 pm

Spencer Hawes for Craig Smith?
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
dozencousins
Analyst
Posts: 3,031
And1: 135
Joined: Jan 11, 2007

 

Post#2 » by dozencousins » Sat Jan 26, 2008 10:24 pm

a simple no way will do !
BMiller52
RealGM
Posts: 10,403
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: my house

 

Post#3 » by BMiller52 » Sat Jan 26, 2008 10:53 pm

No thanks.
Image
User avatar
revprodeji
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,388
And1: 8
Joined: Dec 25, 2002
Location: Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought
Contact:

 

Post#4 » by revprodeji » Sat Jan 26, 2008 10:58 pm

Craig Smith (10 and 5 off the bench) would be a very good low post option for you guys.

Smith+2nd for Hawes?
http://www.timetoshop.org
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...
BMiller52
RealGM
Posts: 10,403
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: my house

 

Post#5 » by BMiller52 » Sat Jan 26, 2008 11:00 pm

No thanks guys. We're waiting to see if Hawes can be our C of the future. And we have enough undersized PFs as it is. Smith doesn't really do anything for us. He doesn't have the same potential Spencer does.
Image
User avatar
RIPskaterdude
RealGM
Posts: 92,808
And1: 37,037
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: #MakeAmericaGreatAgain
   

 

Post#6 » by RIPskaterdude » Sat Jan 26, 2008 11:35 pm

Not a bad trade, but it's too early to see what Hawes can do. Remember, he can't even buy beer yet.
Image
Ballings7
RealGM
Posts: 24,075
And1: 1,952
Joined: Jan 04, 2006

 

Post#7 » by Ballings7 » Sat Jan 26, 2008 11:44 pm

I really like Smith in general, but not for a prospect like Hawes. He's just playing limited minutes and early in his rookie year at 19.

Unrealistic.
The Playoffs don't care about your Analytics
User avatar
pillwenney
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 48,887
And1: 2,603
Joined: Sep 19, 2004
Location: Avidly reading pstyousuck.blogspot.com/
Contact:
 

 

Post#8 » by pillwenney » Sun Jan 27, 2008 12:33 am

Wow, I'm surprised the responses haven't been angrier.

No, no, no, no, no. Smith is a nice player but his potential isn't close to Spencer's. You don't trade a 19-year-old you just drafted a few months ago for a nice former 2nd rounder.
KF10
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 25,434
And1: 5,537
Joined: Jul 28, 2006
 

 

Post#9 » by KF10 » Sun Jan 27, 2008 12:41 am

Kings decline. Hawes have the potential to be something great IMO...
User avatar
UKF
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,810
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 05, 2006
Contact:

 

Post#10 » by UKF » Sun Jan 27, 2008 12:44 am

Hawes has way to much potential for us to trade him for Craig Smith. Quick and simple No.
User avatar
UKF
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,810
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 05, 2006
Contact:

 

Post#11 » by UKF » Sun Jan 27, 2008 12:46 am

revprodeji wrote:Craig Smith (10 and 5 off the bench) would be a very good low post option for you guys.

Smith+2nd for Hawes?


I would think about it if you gave us your first. Ill toss in Douby too.
ICMTM
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,347
And1: 176
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Location: Sacramento, Ca
     

 

Post#12 » by ICMTM » Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:44 am

Let's just lock this down while people are still civil.
KANGZZZZZ!

Return to Sacramento Kings