Jason Kidd wants out (Merged Threads)

NetsForce · Post #61 » by **NetsForce** » Sun Jan 27, 2008 11:44 pm

BooRadley wrote:Whoever gets Kidd in the West would automatically drop out of the playoffs. You'd have to move some key players due to his salary and Kidd just isn't good enough to lead a team. Even with the lack of a front court, a Kidd-RJ-Carter trio should be a lot more competitive. Kidd just doesn't have that impact anymore, hollow triple doubles not withstanding.

Wow... That's the dumbest post. Ever. Congratulations. Wow...

BooRadley · Post #62 » by **BooRadley** » Sun Jan 27, 2008 11:48 pm

Kidd can't lead a team to a decent record in the East with 2 good players, you think he could in the West?? And my post might be dumb, but I've seen a lot worse come out of your mouth.

NetsForce · Post #63 » by **NetsForce** » Sun Jan 27, 2008 11:49 pm

BooRadley wrote:Kidd can't lead a team to a decent record in the East with 2 good players, you think he could in the West?? And my post might be dumb, but I've seen a lot worse come out of your mouth.

Lies.

Bowens · Post #64 » by **Bowens** » Sun Jan 27, 2008 11:55 pm

Kidd is upset with the Nets because he didn't get the contract extension he wanted. If Rod Thorn gave him the additional 2 years, you'd see the Nets magically start to win games. This is about money, and Kidd would obviously do better for himself if he gets it now rather than when his current deal expires.

exkonvict · Post #65 » by **exkonvict** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 12:00 am

Odom + VladRad + Crittenton for Kidd + Williams

Harry Heinous · Post #66 » by **Harry Heinous** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 12:09 am

which williams?

NetsForce · Post #67 » by **NetsForce** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 12:12 am

Neither.

exkonvict · Post #68 » by **exkonvict** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 12:36 am

Harry Heinous wrote:which williams?

Sean

Dr Salad Bowl · Post #69 » by **Dr Salad Bowl** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 1:14 am

BooRadley wrote:Kidd can't lead a team to a decent record in the East with 2 good players, you think he could in the West?? And my post might be dumb, but I've seen a lot worse come out of your mouth.

Well actually he got to the finals twice with RJ and Kmart, basically turning Kenyon into an All Star player with his passes.

BooRadley · Post #70 » by **BooRadley** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 1:34 am

Thanks Dr. Salad Bowl, but ever heard of a player declining and eventually retiring? Did he take them their last year or even 2 years ago? That was 5 freaking years ago.

richboy · Post #71 » by **richboy** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 1:42 am

I wouldn't trade for Kidd unless I could put 4 very good offensive players around him.

The_Child_Prodigy · Post #72 » by **The_Child_Prodigy** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:50 am

richboy wrote:I wouldn't trade for Kidd unless I could put 4 very good offensive players around him.

He can make almost anyone look better on offense than anyone.

LakerFanMan · Post #73 » by **LakerFanMan** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:52 am

richboy wrote:I wouldn't trade for Kidd unless I could put 4 very good offensive players around him.

I really don't get this post.

jeff1624 · Post #74 » by **jeff1624** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:57 am

^^In other words a team like the phoenix suns...

LakerFanMan · Post #75 » by **LakerFanMan** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 3:02 am

^^^ LOL, nice. A little below the belt, but nice none the less.

hiphop1 · Post #76 » by **hiphop1** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:08 pm

I think the best destination for him would be San Antonio. If I remember correctly he said he wouldnt mind playing there after his contract is up.This works in trade checker.

Tony Parker
Brent Barry

for

Jason Kidd

Post #77 » by **canman1971** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:15 pm

I think one Jason Kidd thread on a Celtics board is enough. Put it on the general board if you would like to further this. In fact, I will move it there.

HarlemHeat37 · Post #78 » by **HarlemHeat37** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:19 pm

Kidd is better than TP, but not for our team..COMPLETELY different players..Parker is a 100% great fit for the system, Kidd isn't..it's not like Kidd is going to want to come off the bench..

Joebiscuit · Post #79 » by **Joebiscuit** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:21 pm

Why in the world would spurs give up Parker for Kidd? Parker is much younger and it is not like SA is looking to make a move to put them over the top. This trade simply makes zero sense for the spurs.

NetsForce · Post #80 » by **NetsForce** » Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:45 pm

It doesn't make much sense, Tony P hasn't even his his prime yet.

Jason Kidd wants out (Merged Threads)

OT:Jason Kidd

OT:Jason Kidd