ImageImage

Trade with Seattle

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

User avatar
DH34Phan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,627
And1: 114
Joined: Jun 30, 2005
Contact:

Trade with Seattle 

Post#1 » by DH34Phan » Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:11 pm

Milwaukee trades:
Charlie Villanueva
Dan Gadzuric
Jake Voskuhl
2008 2nd Round Pick

Seattle trades:
Earl Watson
Chris Wilcox

Mo/ Watson
Redd/ Ivey
Simmons/ Bell
Wilcox/ Yi
Bogut/ Ruffin
Balls2TheWalls
RealGM
Posts: 20,343
And1: 4,113
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
         

Re: Trade with Seattle 

Post#2 » by Balls2TheWalls » Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:17 pm

DH34Phan wrote:Milwaukee trades:
Charlie Villanueva
Dan Gadzuric
Jake Voskuhl
2008 2nd Round Pick

Seattle trades:
Earl Watson
Chris Wilcox

Mo/ Watson
Redd/ Ivey
Simmons/ Bell
Wilcox/ Yi
Bogut/ Ruffin


I'm not certain that I like this trade. I think that any trade needs to drop Mo or Redd. I think that adding another player that wants touches in Wilcox will only hurt the team chemistry even further. I like a trade that sends Mo for Watson and Wilcox... maybe with us unloading some cap garbage.
User avatar
blkout
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,689
And1: 1,914
Joined: Dec 12, 2005
Location: Melbourne
 

 

Post#3 » by blkout » Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:18 pm

I can't see Seattle doing this, but I like Earl Watson.
Image
pilprin
Pro Prospect
Posts: 934
And1: 127
Joined: Jul 12, 2002

 

Post#4 » by pilprin » Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:19 pm

I agree that Mo or Redd need to go.
User avatar
DH34Phan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,627
And1: 114
Joined: Jun 30, 2005
Contact:

 

Post#5 » by DH34Phan » Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:21 pm

Citizen.Eras3d wrote:I can't see Seattle doing this, but I like Earl Watson.

They are trying to get younger. Villanueva gives them another future stud to go along with Durant and Green.

Yes Gadz sucks, but have you seen their Centers? Gadz could start for them, and I could see them running an up tempo style with him. Wilcox is up for a new contract, and I doubt they want to extend him.

So yeah, IMO Villanueva and the pick is worth Watson and Wilcox.
User avatar
DH34Phan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,627
And1: 114
Joined: Jun 30, 2005
Contact:

 

Post#6 » by DH34Phan » Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:22 pm

pilprin wrote:I agree that Mo or Redd need to go.

Yep. This trade gives us a PG, and a PF, so whoever we do trade out of Mo or Redd we can target a SF.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 101,806
And1: 54,939
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

 

Post#7 » by MickeyDavis » Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:22 pm

DH34Phan wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


They are trying to get younger. Villanueva gives them another future stud to go along with Durant and Green.



If he was a future "stud" we wouldn't be shopping him around.
Balls2TheWalls
RealGM
Posts: 20,343
And1: 4,113
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
         

 

Post#8 » by Balls2TheWalls » Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:23 pm

MickeyDavis wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



If he was a future "stud" we wouldn't be shopping him around.


:nod:
User avatar
DH34Phan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,627
And1: 114
Joined: Jun 30, 2005
Contact:

 

Post#9 » by DH34Phan » Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:23 pm

MickeyDavis wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



If he was a future "stud" we wouldn't be shopping him around.

Only to unload Gadz on someone...duh!!! :nod:
User avatar
Fight the Tank
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,059
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 21, 2008
Location: Healthy Players>Injured Players

 

Post#10 » by Fight the Tank » Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:25 pm

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/t ... &te=&cash=

How bout this trade? Maybe Toronto adds a first rounder.
User avatar
DH34Phan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,627
And1: 114
Joined: Jun 30, 2005
Contact:

 

Post#11 » by DH34Phan » Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:27 pm

Bogutneedsball wrote:http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=1710~692~2010~598~635&teams=28~28~15~15~15&te=&cash=

How bout this trade? Maybe Toronto adds a first rounder.

:noway:

I would prefer to get someone under the age of 27 for Redd. Plus, Rasho has absolutely no role on this team.
User avatar
Fight the Tank
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,059
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 21, 2008
Location: Healthy Players>Injured Players

 

Post#12 » by Fight the Tank » Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:28 pm

DH34Phan wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


:noway:

I would prefer to get someone under the age of 27 for Redd. Plus, Rasho has absolutely no role on this team.


He is an expiring contract....That is his role. Redd is addition by subtraction at this point.
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,493
And1: 4,430
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

 

Post#13 » by Kerb Hohl » Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:29 pm

I think they would want more for Wilcox. His numbers are a bit disappointing this year and inconsistent, but they know that he is and can be a beast down low. CV can score and has potential but I think they'd rather have Wilcox. Add the fact that we are dumping our crap in Gaza for an equally bad contract in Watson(a much more productive player) and they hang up the phone. Oh, but I guess they could help their D-league team out with that 2nd round pick.

Honestly though I was proposing trades for Wilcox before the season...I didn't want him that badly but I can't recall exactly, there was a pretty good trade that we had proposed for him.
Balls2TheWalls
RealGM
Posts: 20,343
And1: 4,113
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
         

 

Post#14 » by Balls2TheWalls » Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:29 pm

Bogutneedsball wrote:http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=1710~692~2010~598~635&teams=28~28~15~15~15&te=&cash=

How bout this trade? Maybe Toronto adds a first rounder.


I think that if this is the best we can get that we pull the trigger on it. I love the prospect of dumping Gadzuric, and if they could throw in a first rounder... I like the kind of role players we would be bringing in.
User avatar
Fight the Tank
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,059
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 21, 2008
Location: Healthy Players>Injured Players

 

Post#15 » by Fight the Tank » Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:31 pm

Balls2TheWalls wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I think that if this is the best we can get that we pull the trigger on it. I love the prospect of dumping Gadzuric, and if they could throw in a first rounder... I like the kind of role players we would be bringing in.


That was my thinking. Toronto could use a 2 guard. They have an expiring contract (Nesterovic) and two great 3 pt. shooters that we can surround around Bogut. Plus if we get a pick it makes it a slam dunk for me.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 101,806
And1: 54,939
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

 

Post#16 » by MickeyDavis » Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:44 pm

DH34Phan wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


Only to unload Gadz on someone...duh!!! :nod:


Yes unloading Gadz would be a good thing. But if you really think CV is going to be a stud you don't get rid of him to dump a contract.
Debit One
Starter
Posts: 2,369
And1: 99
Joined: Apr 21, 2005
Location: YOU WANNA KNOW HOW I FEEL ABOUT THIS TEAM?

 

Post#17 » by Debit One » Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:47 pm

So you think that Seattle is going to take on Gadz contract, and give us Wilcox and Watson, for the privilege of receiving CV?

No way. I bet they wouldn't do CV for Wilcox straight up.
User avatar
smauss
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,733
And1: 432
Joined: Jul 23, 2005
Contact:
     

 

Post#18 » by smauss » Mon Jan 28, 2008 7:07 pm

Debit One wrote:So you think that Seattle is going to take on Gadz contract, and give us Wilcox and Watson, for the privilege of receiving CV?

No way. I bet they wouldn't do CV for Wilcox straight up.


Agreed!

I must admit, I admire DH's stick-to-it-iveness! Eventually if anyone on the bucks gets traded, he can claim (and probably rightly so) that he had a thread on that exact trade. :lol:
"Too many people ask for help, and sometimes you have to help yourself." - Jerry Sloan (CBQ is missed)

simul justus et peccator
User avatar
DH34Phan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,627
And1: 114
Joined: Jun 30, 2005
Contact:

 

Post#19 » by DH34Phan » Mon Jan 28, 2008 7:48 pm

smauss wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Agreed!

I must admit, I admire DH's stick-to-it-iveness! Eventually if anyone on the bucks gets traded, he can claim (and probably rightly so) that he had a thread on that exact trade. :lol:

:bowdown:

I'm doing my best to trade Gadz...is that too much to ask!?!?!
User avatar
msquared4873
Sophomore
Posts: 111
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 09, 2008

 

Post#20 » by msquared4873 » Mon Jan 28, 2008 8:48 pm

Any trade that would move Yi to the bench is not going to happen. We are not going to make the playoffs this year so they will play through any growing pains Yi has this season to get him much needed experience.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks