Almost got away, but really was needed. Balanced offensive effort, too.
Kevin with another GW shot
Salmons played good d on Wilkins there, he just had a better shot - I was kinda surprised it went in.
KingInExile wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
We'll let you know in about 3 weeks. By then even Petrie might now.
BMiller52 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
![]()
![]()
Petrie has no idea what he wants to do to be honest.
pillwenney wrote:SacKingZZZ wrote:No thanks to Deng. I read a rumor surfing hoopshype awhile back saying Gay for Reke is a possibility.
Must be true, if it's a rumor you read on Hoopshype.


BMiller52 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
![]()
![]()
Petrie has no idea what he wants to do to be honest.

sackings916 wrote:Kings fans kill me. Bibby had a bad stretch in the 3rd and was crucified, then he comes through with shooting and passing in the clutch and barely a peep, maybe because he was overshadowed by Kmart but he still deserves more credit than he gets.
KingInExile wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Actually, looking at our salary for next year, I think it is very likely that he will try to move Bibby for a package that will convert at least part of his salary into expiring deals. The Maloofs don't want to pay the luxury tax, but we will be pretty close to that level with the roster the way it is (assumes Ron walks, we resign Justin and Beno and sign our draft pick and a couple minimum FAs). One of Bibby, Miller, SAR or KT have to be moved by the deadline for some sort of expiring deal(s) to keep salary where the Maloofs will be happy. Bibby is the most probable one to be moved.
But I think Petrie still does want to compete and try to make the playoffs.

SacKingZZZ wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Here is what I think. Bibby stays unless something great comes along. Otherwise Ron has to be top priority so we don't lose him for nothing. Bibby can be a draft night trade if we are wanting another pick, in fact it may be the best time to move him. Or even as late as next deadline to ease the tax burden.
mitchweber wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
But if we just let Ron go (or essentially move him for other expirings) then we still will be well into the tax going into next year--that is unless we move him with Kenny.

SacKingZZZ wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Here is what I think. Bibby stays unless something great comes along. Otherwise Ron has to be top priority so we don't lose him for nothing. Bibby can be a draft night trade if we are wanting another pick, in fact it may be the best time to move him. Or even as late as next deadline to ease the tax burden.
mprose wrote:And that leaves me with the conclusion that DMC is the Sarah Palin of the NBA.

Any team that will be willing to take Artest with the knowledge that he will opt out will be a team who will have high interest in signing him this summer. They would probably also want some sort of assurance from Ron and his agent that he would resign with them over the summer. That basically means that we're talking about a strong playoff team with a legitimate shot at winning a championship in the near future. Take a look at those teams and point to just one who would be willing (or capable) to send the Kings a package of expiring deals, young prospects and a draft pick for Ron and KT. I think you will have a very hard time finding one.SacKingZZZ wrote:No, I am saying we need to MOVE Artest and move Kenny with him. I think that is the only way Kenny is moved since moving 20 + million by combining him with Brad or Mike is unlikely except for maybe a Cleveland Cavs scnenario. Letting him expire is pretty pointless because it really does nothing to help us rebuild nor does it keep us under the tax.
KingInExile wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Any team that will be willing to take Artest with the knowledge that he will opt out will be a team who will have high interest in signing him this summer. They would probably also want some sort of assurance from Ron and his agent that he would resign with them over the summer. That basically means that we're talking about a strong playoff team with a legitimate shot at winning a championship in the near future. Take a look at those teams and point to just one who would be willing (or capable) to send the Kings a package of expiring deals, young prospects and a draft pick for Ron and KT. I think you will have a very hard time finding one.

Smills91 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Lakers
Magic
Mavs
Pistons
Suns
Are all teams that could conceiveably have interest in Ron.
KingInExile wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Any team that will be willing to take Artest with the knowledge that he will opt out will be a team who will have high interest in signing him this summer. They would probably also want some sort of assurance from Ron and his agent that he would resign with them over the summer. That basically means that we're talking about a strong playoff team with a legitimate shot at winning a championship in the near future. Take a look at those teams and point to just one who would be willing (or capable) to send the Kings a package of expiring deals, young prospects and a draft pick for Ron and KT. I think you will have a very hard time finding one.
KingInExile wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Agreed...but which of those teams are willing to or capable of offering a package of expirings, young talent and picks for Ron [b]AND Kenny (which is SacKingZZZ's wish). [/b]
Lakers...could put a deal together that would include Kwame Brown and filler (with luck Crittenton would be included) and possibly a pick. The question, though is WOULD the Lakers do that?
Magic...barely have enough expirings to put together to cover Artest let alone convert part of KT's contract. They also don't really have any young prospects to give up. I seriously doubt they can put a package together.
Mavs...similar to the Magic: not enough expirings and thin on young prospects.
Pistons...Maxiell would be a nice young prospect to get back, but all of their expiring deals are small. We would probably be looking at a 7 for 2 deal just to get salaries to work out. I don't see that happening.
Suns...The only scenario that would work out financially would be a trade of Ron and KT for Marion with the understanding that Marion would opt out and we would not resign him (or we resign him to a max deal and take the tax hit...I would gladly pay the tax for him). Unfortunately I don't see this as a realistic possibility.
So the Suns and the Lakers COULD put together a package for Ron and KT...but I don't think the odds are great that they WOULD put together those deals.

Wasn't trying to imply that you were only interested in deals that included picks, young talent and expirings. Those are criteria that I think would be the only reasonable return for a team that theoretically should be rebuilding. My statement was just pointing out that you wanted the deal to include KT, that's all.SacKingZZZ wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Don't read something into what I didn't write. I dont think EVERY situation can or would involve young talent AND picks. We may have to sacrifice one or the other depending on what that given team has. As long as we dump KT for a shorter deal, I will be OK.
Also don't forget that Petrie is the master of piggybacking onto other trades to get what he wants. For example that rumored Kobe deal.