ImageImageImageImage

We are probably in the best position to get Kidd

Moderators: Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior, UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird

KoolMikeSkii
Junior
Posts: 467
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
Location: NYC

We are probably in the best position to get Kidd 

Post#1 » by KoolMikeSkii » Tue Jan 29, 2008 1:21 pm

i know i know theres a trade thread but this is not giving a trade idea that part is a given

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=1055~45~209~264~3024~429&teams=17~17~17~17~17~19&te=&cash=

We basically by having 10 mil in expirings and a big man whos 7 mil comes off the cap just in time for lebrons opt out is the key i think.

Look at all the contenders without a PG theres Dallas, Denver, Cleveland, Boston, Lakers Houston the only thing they can give NJ is bloated contracts that dont end for years the only one close is the Lakers they have Odom and Kwame but i think the lakers need Odom to contend.

As for Orlando we are not a "Contender" yet but with the trade above we dam sure are! think for a second of what Kidd must be thinking your gonna put me on a young team that has the most dominant big man in the game basically an assist machine. Annnnd if hes bieng doubled or tripled your giving me a plethora of 3 point shooters is there a more fun place to be? Not to mention he wont pay taxes on his money! he can take his kid to Disney world everyday for the rest of his life if he brings a chip to Orlando.

Ohh and he did say in the papers a couple weeks ago Orlando will be the place to be was he hinting?

I think we got a shot thoughts?
User avatar
Jiwol
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,015
And1: 1,384
Joined: Feb 13, 2002
 

 

Post#2 » by Jiwol » Tue Jan 29, 2008 1:26 pm

KoolMikeSkii
Junior
Posts: 467
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
Location: NYC

 

Post#3 » by KoolMikeSkii » Tue Jan 29, 2008 1:54 pm

Trade ID #4445552
theTHIEF
RealGM
Posts: 12,940
And1: 214
Joined: Aug 08, 2003
 

 

Post#4 » by theTHIEF » Tue Jan 29, 2008 1:56 pm

i disagree...
User avatar
Cigamodnalro
RealGM
Posts: 12,371
And1: 66
Joined: Apr 10, 2006
Location: Political Asylum

 

Post#5 » by Cigamodnalro » Tue Jan 29, 2008 2:24 pm

You're crazy if you think they'll take six players for Kidd. The only chance we have at him is in a three or four-way trade, and even then we're giving up half our team.
https://twitter.com/cigamodnalro
“A house pulled down is half rebuilt” - Ancient Proverb
"There's beauty in the breakdown" - Frou Frou
"We're going to turn this team around 360 degrees" - Jason Kidd
RoBo02
Senior
Posts: 583
And1: 291
Joined: May 23, 2007
   

 

Post#6 » by RoBo02 » Tue Jan 29, 2008 2:38 pm

In your scenario, you forgot to mention how the Nets go about freeing the 4 extra roster spots needed to bring in those expiring contracts.
User avatar
MagicalMan
Analyst
Posts: 3,503
And1: 9
Joined: Jun 12, 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN

 

Post#7 » by MagicalMan » Tue Jan 29, 2008 2:41 pm

they can just waive them and we can get them back again. Perfect!
KoolMikeSkii
Junior
Posts: 467
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
Location: NYC

 

Post#8 » by KoolMikeSkii » Tue Jan 29, 2008 2:46 pm

Didnt Boston trade a bunch of people for KG? when a contract is that big thats what you have to do. They can cut whoever is not in the plans or dump lesser players. And how is it half our team 3 of the 5 guys dont even play? and the 2 PGs we send will be replaced by Kidd.
User avatar
Tommy Udo 6
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 42,507
And1: 28
Joined: Jun 13, 2003
Location: San Francisco/East Bay CA

 

Post#9 » by Tommy Udo 6 » Tue Jan 29, 2008 2:55 pm

mikegraphix wrote:Didnt Boston trade a bunch of people for KG? when a contract is that big thats what you have to do. They can cut whoever is not in the plans or dump lesser players. And how is it half our team 3 of the 5 guys dont even play? and the 2 PGs we send will be replaced by Kidd.


but that was the offseason - before rosters are set.

All teams have at least 13 players & most have the full 15

Teams arent going to take multiple players for one if they can avoid it. They would have to release players & buy them out.
The gem cannot be polished without friction, nor man perfected without trials.
- -- Chinese proverb
User avatar
MagicalMan
Analyst
Posts: 3,503
And1: 9
Joined: Jun 12, 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN

 

Post#10 » by MagicalMan » Tue Jan 29, 2008 3:00 pm

bulls6 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



but that was the offseason - before rosters are set.

All teams have at least 13 players & most have the full 15

Teams arent going to take multiple players for one if they can avoid it. They would have to release players & buy them out.


but when trading for expirings, the player doesnt really matter other than to fill up salary and expire. Usually they arent coming to be an integral part of the offense, and waiving expirings happens all the time (see the Magic when they traded for Penny and released him automatically).
User avatar
pikimagic
Analyst
Posts: 3,204
And1: 2
Joined: Nov 10, 2003

 

Post#11 » by pikimagic » Tue Jan 29, 2008 3:02 pm

we arent ging to get Kidd in any trade trust me ...putting all this Kidd trades are crazy IMO ........
Chorro e' locos!
User avatar
Tommy Udo 6
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 42,507
And1: 28
Joined: Jun 13, 2003
Location: San Francisco/East Bay CA

 

Post#12 » by Tommy Udo 6 » Tue Jan 29, 2008 3:05 pm

MagicalMan wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



but when trading for expirings, the player doesnt really matter other than to fill up salary and expire. Usually they arent coming to be an integral part of the offense, and waiving expirings happens all the time (see the Magic when they traded for Penny and released him automatically).


It could work - especially if Magic kick i $3 million to cover some of those salaries.

If Nets want Ben Wallace, you can ship some of the players to the Bulls & they can ship Wallace to NJ in a 3 way. Nets wouldnt normally take Wallace for Kidd, but they cant afford an unhappy Kidd hanging around & may do it as a last resort.
The gem cannot be polished without friction, nor man perfected without trials.
- -- Chinese proverb
User avatar
MagicalMan
Analyst
Posts: 3,503
And1: 9
Joined: Jun 12, 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN

 

Post#13 » by MagicalMan » Tue Jan 29, 2008 3:11 pm

Its just that the real problem with the Nets is they brought Brian Hill back as an assistant.
Optimus_Steel
RealGM
Posts: 38,096
And1: 12,091
Joined: Sep 16, 2003
Location: Winter Garden, FL
   

 

Post#14 » by Optimus_Steel » Tue Jan 29, 2008 3:48 pm

bulls6 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



It could work - especially if Magic kick i $3 million to cover some of those salaries.

If Nets want Ben Wallace, you can ship some of the players to the Bulls & they can ship Wallace to NJ in a 3 way. Nets wouldnt normally take Wallace for Kidd, but they cant afford an unhappy Kidd hanging around & may do it as a last resort.


I just dont see ther Nets giving up Kidd for Wallace. I think they would rather keep an unhappy Kidd than a flamed out Wallace.

And the Nets are gonna somehow take 6 of our trash players during the season for Kidd? It aint gonna happen. There arent enough rosters spots available to make such a move during the season.
aka: prorl
Dwightmare
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,676
And1: 24
Joined: Sep 03, 2006

 

Post#15 » by Dwightmare » Tue Jan 29, 2008 3:59 pm

hasnt Otis said over and over that we arent interested in quick fixes/aged veterans like Webber, PJ and Kidd. He has specifically named each of those players. I dont see any of them wanting to play for a GM that calls them old.
User avatar
Max Power
Head Coach
Posts: 6,907
And1: 1,250
Joined: Nov 30, 2001
Location: Orlando

 

Post#16 » by Max Power » Tue Jan 29, 2008 4:01 pm

I know Otis likes Nelson, I do too, but who better to teach him how to play the pg better than Jason Kidd? He'd be a great tutor for Jameer. A couple years behind him and he'd be a much better starter in a year or 2.
You look confused...let me fill you in.
User avatar
mhectorgato
RealGM
Posts: 29,446
And1: 574
Joined: Jan 11, 2005
Location: Finals Baby!
 

 

Post#17 » by mhectorgato » Tue Jan 29, 2008 4:34 pm

dwightmeer wrote:hasnt Otis said over and over that we arent interested in quick fixes/aged veterans like Webber, PJ and Kidd. He has specifically named each of those players. I dont see any of them wanting to play for a GM that calls them old.


It all depends on what we'd have to trade to get Kidd. I think Otis was saying if we had to trade Hedo to get JKidd, then it would be an attempt to improve the team in the short term, and that's what he'd be against.

However, if we were able to give up only expirings (don't think so) and JJ, then we would still have our core pieces in place and be building for short term and the future.

Perhaps we can get a 3-way trade worked out for this to happen, but I don't think it's likely, given Kidd's contract - 19 this year and 20 next.
NEM wrote: However, I'm a fan of my team winning so, keep the winning coming. All the "tank" fans can take their crap to another board. We are here to win.
maginno
Banned User
Posts: 4,730
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 06, 2007

 

Post#18 » by maginno » Tue Jan 29, 2008 5:12 pm

Now do you finally see why it matters overpaying Rashard? For all of you saying it doesn't matter we wouldn't have cap space anyway this is a perfect example.

If Rashard was even remotely tradeable by his contract you could do the trade in a heartbeat. Don't know if you would want to for Kidd but change the names. Gilbert, Kobe, lebron . extreme superstar names yes but to that we could add packages of two solid players or a good player with a first round pick yada, yada yada. The world is yours when you have good players signed for the right amount. You can wheel and deal.

Instead mostly all you can do is sit and watch. Who would have thunk the Nets would be in break up and rebuild mode this year.
Neon1
RealGM
Posts: 11,085
And1: 1,576
Joined: Dec 24, 2003
Location: The O
       

 

Post#19 » by Neon1 » Tue Jan 29, 2008 5:29 pm

RoBo02 wrote:In your scenario, you forgot to mention how the Nets go about freeing the 4 extra roster spots needed to bring in those expiring contracts.


NJ has only 13 player contracts.

If he were to make it

SG JJ Redick
PG Carlos Arroyo
F/C Tony Battie
G Keyon Dooling
PF Pat Garrity
plus cash, 1 or 2 draft picks, and or rights to PF Fran Vazquez.

FOR

PG Jason Kidd
PG Darrall Armstrong
and PF Malik Allen

Then the trade fits both roster spots available AND salary reqirements. Sending cash helps them with the waiving of whichever crap they want to cut loose. Thats a lot of expiring money plus a cheap contract in JJ and a reasonable one in Battie.


AS FOR LINEUPS...

SG Jameer Nelson (Plays as SG, Defends the PG)
PG Jason Kidd (Plays PG, Defends the SG)
SF Hedo Turkoglu
PF Rashard Lewis
C Dwight Howard

PG Darall Armstrong
SG Keith Bogans
SF Mo Evans
PF Brian Cook
C Adonal Foyle
TNMagicFan
Head Coach
Posts: 6,252
And1: 243
Joined: Nov 18, 2005
Location: Bristol , TN.
     

 

Post#20 » by TNMagicFan » Tue Jan 29, 2008 5:36 pm

I don't think the Nets give a rats a** about the size of contracts . They have three large contracts . Why would it bother them to trade one for the other . Shard would never be involved in a trade for Kidd but I don't think his contract would stop the Nets . Alot of teams it would , but not the Nets

Return to Orlando Magic