Two Trades (another Redd thread)
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
Two Trades (another Redd thread)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 39,420
- And1: 11,225
- Joined: May 12, 2002
Two Trades (another Redd thread)
Anyway we could make an official Redd trade thread? I hate starting new thread for every trade idea. Then again, I know MD hates stickys. Just asking.
1.
Redd - Gadzuric
for
Ben Wallace - Andres Nocioni
2a.
CV - Voskuhl
for
Kapono - 1st rounder
2b.
CV - Simmons
for
Kapono - Garbajosa - Graham
Ivey
Mo
Nocioni
Yi
Bogut
Bell
Wallace
Mason
Kapono
Simmons or Voskuhl
Ruffin
Sessions
Noel
1.
Redd - Gadzuric
for
Ben Wallace - Andres Nocioni
2a.
CV - Voskuhl
for
Kapono - 1st rounder
2b.
CV - Simmons
for
Kapono - Garbajosa - Graham
Ivey
Mo
Nocioni
Yi
Bogut
Bell
Wallace
Mason
Kapono
Simmons or Voskuhl
Ruffin
Sessions
Noel
- paulpressey25
- Senior Mod - Bucks
- Posts: 62,517
- And1: 29,515
- Joined: Oct 27, 2002
-
The Redd trade threads rise and fall on their own merits.......
I'd do both deals. Easily.
But if the Redd stock market has a lower value right now, then I'd do Wallace/Noc for Redd/CV. That move has appeal to me because we need a banger, and even a half alive Ben Wallace can still bang around for 20-25 minutes.
The other one is the New York deal.
Redd/CV for Jamaal Crawford/Lee/Balkman.....
Actually as we think these through, tonight I'm more inclined to like the Knicks deal. Yes, I know I'll get flamed away about Crawford, but he's 6-5", a very active player and he can pass the ball. So you get a bit less efficient version of Redd's gunning but a guy who can do more things for us in a ball movement offense.
I'd do both deals. Easily.
But if the Redd stock market has a lower value right now, then I'd do Wallace/Noc for Redd/CV. That move has appeal to me because we need a banger, and even a half alive Ben Wallace can still bang around for 20-25 minutes.
The other one is the New York deal.
Redd/CV for Jamaal Crawford/Lee/Balkman.....
Actually as we think these through, tonight I'm more inclined to like the Knicks deal. Yes, I know I'll get flamed away about Crawford, but he's 6-5", a very active player and he can pass the ball. So you get a bit less efficient version of Redd's gunning but a guy who can do more things for us in a ball movement offense.
- paulpressey25
- Senior Mod - Bucks
- Posts: 62,517
- And1: 29,515
- Joined: Oct 27, 2002
-
- paulpressey25
- Senior Mod - Bucks
- Posts: 62,517
- And1: 29,515
- Joined: Oct 27, 2002
-
My fault...I wasn't processing the trades as a pairing and then thinking we'd have the SF position covered by Noc and Dez. I was looking at it more stand alone and figuring I'd rather keep Simmons and get the Raptors first round pick.
The only flaw in the trade is that Toronto most likely won't take CV back even though their fans would love it.
The only flaw in the trade is that Toronto most likely won't take CV back even though their fans would love it.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 39,420
- And1: 11,225
- Joined: May 12, 2002
paulpressey25 wrote:My fault...I wasn't processing the trades as a pairing and then thinking we'd have the SF position covered by Noc and Dez. I was looking at it more stand alone and figuring I'd rather keep Simmons and get the Raptors first round pick.
The only flaw in the trade is that Toronto most likely won't take CV back even though their fans would love it.
I don't know why they wouldn't.
Bargs is terrible. He's a fan favorite. He played his best ball there. He's still young and cheap. They wouldn't be giving much up for him (bad contract).
Although he's not European, so you're probably correct.
- th87
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,565
- And1: 13,527
- Joined: Dec 04, 2005
Okay, my turn:
1. Redd/Gadz for Granger/Murphy/Daniels.
This would turn the Pacers into a contender, I think. Elite-ish players in Redd and O'Neal would put them in the running for a 4 seed. Gadz might provide productive minutes behind Foster.
For us, we get our SF for the future.
2. CV/Bobby for Lee/Q-Rich/Jones.
Knicks probably don't do this, but who knows - maybe they want to make a change, and see hometown kid CV's potential (which there is a lot of).
We get our rugged dirty-work guy, but yeah, a bad contract too.
And then later on:
3. Mo/Daniels(?) for Battier/filler
Obviously, I haven't put as much thought into this one, but it looks like Houston's going nowhere, and they need a PG. I'm not sure if Battier's working out for them as they'd like.
1. Redd/Gadz for Granger/Murphy/Daniels.
This would turn the Pacers into a contender, I think. Elite-ish players in Redd and O'Neal would put them in the running for a 4 seed. Gadz might provide productive minutes behind Foster.
For us, we get our SF for the future.
2. CV/Bobby for Lee/Q-Rich/Jones.
Knicks probably don't do this, but who knows - maybe they want to make a change, and see hometown kid CV's potential (which there is a lot of).
We get our rugged dirty-work guy, but yeah, a bad contract too.
And then later on:
3. Mo/Daniels(?) for Battier/filler
Obviously, I haven't put as much thought into this one, but it looks like Houston's going nowhere, and they need a PG. I'm not sure if Battier's working out for them as they'd like.
- th87
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,565
- And1: 13,527
- Joined: Dec 04, 2005
It's true we'd be stuck under some crappy contracts. And it's true that Bogut/Granger/Lee would be up for contracts at the same time. But the beauty of this is that all of the big contracts except Murphy expire right when it's time to pay Bogut/Granger/Lee.
Next step, we tank hard. And grab us Rose in the lottery (some wishful thinking).
This gives us:
Which gives us:
Bogut/Ruffin
Yi/Lee/Murphy
Granger/Battier
Q-Rich/Bell
Rose/Sessions/Ivey
That's Portland east!
(Okay, I'm back from fantasy-world)
Next step, we tank hard. And grab us Rose in the lottery (some wishful thinking).
This gives us:
Which gives us:
Bogut/Ruffin
Yi/Lee/Murphy
Granger/Battier
Q-Rich/Bell
Rose/Sessions/Ivey
That's Portland east!
(Okay, I'm back from fantasy-world)
- Kerb Hohl
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,493
- And1: 4,430
- Joined: Jun 17, 2005
- Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?
th87 wrote:Okay, my turn:
1. Redd/Gadz for Granger/Murphy/Daniels.
This would turn the Pacers into a contender, I think. Elite-ish players in Redd and O'Neal would put them in the running for a 4 seed. Gadz might provide productive minutes behind Foster.
For us, we get our SF for the future.
2. CV/Bobby for Lee/Q-Rich/Jones.
Knicks probably don't do this, but who knows - maybe they want to make a change, and see hometown kid CV's potential (which there is a lot of).
We get our rugged dirty-work guy, but yeah, a bad contract too.
And then later on:
3. Mo/Daniels(?) for Battier/filler
Obviously, I haven't put as much thought into this one, but it looks like Houston's going nowhere, and they need a PG. I'm not sure if Battier's working out for them as they'd like.
There is a small chance for trade one...probably not.
Trade 2 with all due respect, in Isiah's stupidity he has still blocked including David Lee in almost any trade...even for stars.
I would honestly trade CV for Gus Johnson to do our play-by-play(he does some Knicks games)...I would watch every single game just for that.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 39,420
- And1: 11,225
- Joined: May 12, 2002
New trade....
Milwaukee
Out:
Redd
CV
2nd rounder
In:
Battier
Carl Landry
Kirk Snyder (cut)
Carlos Arroyo (cut)
Pat Garrity (cut)
Orlando 1st protected
Houston 1st protected
Orlando:
Out:
Carlos Arroyo
Pat Garrity
Protected 1st
In:
Mike James
Charlie Villanueva
Milwaukee 2nd
Houston:
Out:
Battier
Mike James
Kirk Snyder
Carl Landry
Protected 1st
In:
Michael Redd
http://www.realgm.com/src_tradechecker/3/
Ivey
Mo
Battier
Yi
Bogut
Bell
Mason
Simmons
Landry
Voskuhl
Ruffin
Storey
Milwaukee
Out:
Redd
CV
2nd rounder
In:
Battier
Carl Landry
Kirk Snyder (cut)
Carlos Arroyo (cut)
Pat Garrity (cut)
Orlando 1st protected
Houston 1st protected
Orlando:
Out:
Carlos Arroyo
Pat Garrity
Protected 1st
In:
Mike James
Charlie Villanueva
Milwaukee 2nd
Houston:
Out:
Battier
Mike James
Kirk Snyder
Carl Landry
Protected 1st
In:
Michael Redd
http://www.realgm.com/src_tradechecker/3/
Ivey
Mo
Battier
Yi
Bogut
Bell
Mason
Simmons
Landry
Voskuhl
Ruffin
Storey
- bigkurty
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,212
- And1: 1,511
- Joined: Apr 23, 2005
- Location: Gilbert, AZ
-
The Lakers have to make a move I am guessing. They are in the playoffs now but with their 9 game road trip coming up and Bynum out for two months, I could see them making a move. Now I have no idea if Redd could be traded to them but to me I would think we could possibly pull off a move like
Simmons, CV, and Gadz
for
Kwame, Javaris, and Vlad
Something like that or maybe a slimmed down version of that could help the Lakers be a little extra competitive and stay in the playoff hunt while allowing us to dump Bobby for an expiring in Kwame, CV for Javaris, and trade bad contracts to see if Vlad and Gad can get a little better in new environments.
Simmons, CV, and Gadz
for
Kwame, Javaris, and Vlad
Something like that or maybe a slimmed down version of that could help the Lakers be a little extra competitive and stay in the playoff hunt while allowing us to dump Bobby for an expiring in Kwame, CV for Javaris, and trade bad contracts to see if Vlad and Gad can get a little better in new environments.
- bigkurty
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,212
- And1: 1,511
- Joined: Apr 23, 2005
- Location: Gilbert, AZ
-
bigkurty wrote:The Lakers have to make a move I am guessing. They are in the playoffs now but with their 9 game road trip coming up and Bynum out for two months, I could see them making a move. Now I have no idea if Redd could be traded to them but to me I would think we could possibly pull off a move like
Simmons, CV, and Gadz
for
Kwame, Javaris, and Vlad
Something like that or maybe a slimmed down version of that could help the Lakers be a little extra competitive and stay in the playoff hunt while allowing us to dump Bobby for an expiring in Kwame, CV for Javaris, and trade bad contracts to see if Vlad and Gad can get a little better in new environments.
After visiting the Lakers board, most of them want Odom out. Maybe expand that deal and do
Redd, Simmons, CV, and Gadz
for
Odom, Kwame, Javaris, Vlad, and a protected first
To me that seems fair. Am I crazy? Oh and I knows its very unrealistic but I honestly think that could make both teams better in the short term and in the long run.
- blkout
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 31,689
- And1: 1,914
- Joined: Dec 12, 2005
- Location: Melbourne
-
Bucks trade:
Michael Redd
Awvee Storey
David Noel
Hawks trade:
Josh Childress
Shelden Williams
Speedy Claxton
Bucks trade:
CV
Hornets trade:
Rasual Butler
Top 15 Protected 1st
Childress:
15.5 points per 40
6.9 rebs per 40
1.8 ast per 40
1.3 steals per 40
58.2 eFG%
64.3 TS%
17.18 Usage Rate
11.5 AST-r
12.2 TO-r
9.9 REB-r
10.1 shots per 40
Redd:
24.2 points per 40
5.0 rebs per 40
3.8 ast per 40
1.1 steals per 40
49.9 eFG%
56.9 TS%
25.7 USG-r
13.7 AST-r
9.4 TO-r
7.5 REB-r
18.2 shots per 40
C - Bogut
PF - Yi
SF - Bobby
SG - Childress
PG - Mo
- Ivey
- Shelden Williams
- Mason
- Bell
- Voshkul
- Gadzuric
- Ruffin
- Butler
- Claxton (when fit, if kept)
- #8 1st round pick
- #26 1st round
I suck at this.
Michael Redd
Awvee Storey
David Noel
Hawks trade:
Josh Childress
Shelden Williams
Speedy Claxton
Bucks trade:
CV
Hornets trade:
Rasual Butler
Top 15 Protected 1st
Childress:
15.5 points per 40
6.9 rebs per 40
1.8 ast per 40
1.3 steals per 40
58.2 eFG%
64.3 TS%
17.18 Usage Rate
11.5 AST-r
12.2 TO-r
9.9 REB-r
10.1 shots per 40
Redd:
24.2 points per 40
5.0 rebs per 40
3.8 ast per 40
1.1 steals per 40
49.9 eFG%
56.9 TS%
25.7 USG-r
13.7 AST-r
9.4 TO-r
7.5 REB-r
18.2 shots per 40
C - Bogut
PF - Yi
SF - Bobby
SG - Childress
PG - Mo
- Ivey
- Shelden Williams
- Mason
- Bell
- Voshkul
- Gadzuric
- Ruffin
- Butler
- Claxton (when fit, if kept)
- #8 1st round pick
- #26 1st round
I suck at this.

-
- Senior
- Posts: 630
- And1: 22
- Joined: May 16, 2004
-