ImageImageImage

OT:NewJersey.com Three-way deal.

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

hiphop1
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,086
And1: 32
Joined: Aug 08, 2005
Location: hudson nh

OT:NewJersey.com Three-way deal. 

Post#1 » by hiphop1 » Wed Jan 30, 2008 5:58 pm

Kidd says little about his plans

Wednesday, January 30, 2008

IANNAZZONESTAFF WRITER
EAST RUTHERFORD
Free your mind and your a** will follow
User avatar
greenbeans
RealGM
Posts: 60,132
And1: 14,146
Joined: Sep 14, 2007
     

 

Post#2 » by greenbeans » Wed Jan 30, 2008 6:15 pm

not to be a d***, but what does that post have to do with a 3-way deal??
hiphop1
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,086
And1: 32
Joined: Aug 08, 2005
Location: hudson nh

 

Post#3 » by hiphop1 » Wed Jan 30, 2008 6:21 pm

greenbeans wrote:not to be a d***, but what does that post have to do with a 3-way deal??


I found it on the New Jersey board. This was they way they had it I just copied it. Should I change it?
Free your mind and your a** will follow
Rocky5000
Analyst
Posts: 3,386
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 15, 2008

 

Post#4 » by Rocky5000 » Wed Jan 30, 2008 6:33 pm

Well according to today's LA Times, the Lakers are no longer looking to acquire Kidd and there are no trade talks between the two teams. According to the Dallas Morning News the Mavericks don't want to give up what it will cost to get Kidd. So of the team's mentioned, the two that seemed most likely are already out.

3 other teams mentioned in the article don't make much sense. Nuggets, Spurs and Suns. I think that the Spurs and Suns are pretty set at the starting point guard position, and have very little that they would be willing to part with. A nuggets team of AI, Kidd, Melo, and Camby seems scary on paper, but the only move they could make would be to return Kmart to NJ. Something I don't think the Nets would be interested in. It's also not clear how that team would operate. AI and Kidd both need the ball to be effective, Kidd passing to AI for pullups coming off from screens isn't the best use of AI's abilities.

So that leaves the Cavaliers as the only team that seems to have a real need for Kidd and are willing to pay the price. The problem with the Cavaliers is that they don't have the assets that the Nets want. Larry Hughes doesn't have a place on a team with VC and RJ. Boobie Gibson is good for a young player, but he doesn't make enough to match salaries, and isn't anywhere near Kidd's value. Who's left to trade? Varejao, Gooden, or Big Z, all bigs. Is Cleveland willing to let a couple of those guys go, and are they enough for NJ?
BrokenLeftyJumper
Pro Prospect
Posts: 925
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 01, 2006
Location: Cambridge

 

Post#5 » by BrokenLeftyJumper » Wed Jan 30, 2008 6:34 pm

The Nets are discussing a complicated three-team scenario with the Mavericks and Blazers in which Kidd would go to Dallas, league sources said.

In return, the Nets would get back young players (Jarrett Jack and Travis Outlaw), expiring contracts (Devean George, DeSagana Diop), Jerry Stackhouse, draft picks and cash. More players, including other Nets, would be involved.


That's the three-way deal proposed. Still not exactly sure what Portland would be getting. I've heard Devin Harris mentioned.
User avatar
Al n' Perk No Layups!
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,532
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 30, 2006

 

Post#6 » by Al n' Perk No Layups! » Wed Jan 30, 2008 7:51 pm

Rocky5000 wrote:Well according to today's LA Times, the Lakers are no longer looking to acquire Kidd and there are no trade talks between the two teams. According to the Dallas Morning News the Mavericks don't want to give up what it will cost to get Kidd. So of the team's mentioned, the two that seemed most likely are already out.

3 other teams mentioned in the article don't make much sense. Nuggets, Spurs and Suns. I think that the Spurs and Suns are pretty set at the starting point guard position, and have very little that they would be willing to part with. A nuggets team of AI, Kidd, Melo, and Camby seems scary on paper, but the only move they could make would be to return Kmart to NJ. Something I don't think the Nets would be interested in. It's also not clear how that team would operate. AI and Kidd both need the ball to be effective, Kidd passing to AI for pullups coming off from screens isn't the best use of AI's abilities.

So that leaves the Cavaliers as the only team that seems to have a real need for Kidd and are willing to pay the price. The problem with the Cavaliers is that they don't have the assets that the Nets want. Larry Hughes doesn't have a place on a team with VC and RJ. Boobie Gibson is good for a young player, but he doesn't make enough to match salaries, and isn't anywhere near Kidd's value. Who's left to trade? Varejao, Gooden, or Big Z, all bigs. Is Cleveland willing to let a couple of those guys go, and are they enough for NJ?


Dallas.
Rocky5000
Analyst
Posts: 3,386
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 15, 2008

 

Post#7 » by Rocky5000 » Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:04 pm

Al n' Perk No Layups! wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Dallas.

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent ... 8e119.html
Unless New Jersey plans on a fire sale of Kidd
hiphop1
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,086
And1: 32
Joined: Aug 08, 2005
Location: hudson nh

 

Post#8 » by hiphop1 » Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:10 pm

ESPNNEWS "Lebron wants Kidd"
Free your mind and your a** will follow
User avatar
Dogen
RealGM
Posts: 15,474
And1: 12,169
Joined: Apr 23, 2004
Location: Shulgastan
 

 

Post#9 » by Dogen » Thu Jan 31, 2008 10:01 pm

LeBron makes a great case in that article. If NJ gets expiring contacts and picks, it's a good move for CLE. They could back in the finals easily. LeBron is just flat out amazing and if he was free to move more w/o the ball it would be sick.

I guess we should be hoping it doesn't happen, but man that would really get the EC playoffs to a fevered pitch this year.
:curse:

Return to Boston Celtics