Just wanted to get your opinion. Does inserting a centre in place of Moon ( thus moving Bargs or even Bosh into the SF position ) solve our rebounding issues?
I know the rage nowadays has been playing small but we are no way close to being Phoenix or Golden State.
Letting Moon join Kapono, Delfino, Hump and TJ (or Jose ) in the second unit will run rings around oposing team's 2nd units.
Thoughts?
Will a Big Line Up solve our Rebounding Issue?
Moderators: 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX
Will a Big Line Up solve our Rebounding Issue?
- raptoratode
- Sophomore
- Posts: 141
- And1: 41
- Joined: Jul 23, 2006
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 144
- And1: 8
- Joined: Jul 11, 2006
I dont know about you, but i REALLY REALLY liked last years line-up. It almost seemed like we had 2 teams
but with a little fix up, maybe something like this would be nice
I.e.
Ford, Bosh, Moon, Parker, Hump
Calderon, Bargs, Delfino, Garbo (jk .. man i miss this guy), Kapo, Rasho
Last year i really like the combo with Calderon, Bargs and Garbo .. but now
...
GARBO COME BACK !
but with a little fix up, maybe something like this would be nice
I.e.
Ford, Bosh, Moon, Parker, Hump
Calderon, Bargs, Delfino, Garbo (jk .. man i miss this guy), Kapo, Rasho
Last year i really like the combo with Calderon, Bargs and Garbo .. but now

GARBO COME BACK !
- raptoratode
- Sophomore
- Posts: 141
- And1: 41
- Joined: Jul 23, 2006
I was suggesting more along the lines of Bosh guarding opposing 3s and Rasho & Bargs defending the bigs. If Bosh gets beat, once or twice by the opposing 3s on the defence, I can live with that ( they'll have problems on the other end defending Bosh anyways 80% of the time - net effect - we still end up on top ).
I am already resigned to the fact that Smitch will never pull out Bargs out of the starting line up ( which will always equate to getting beat on the rebounding ) so why not put an additional rebounder to augment that issue.
And there is no way we don't score with that line up as alluded to by some of you. Bargs can be himself jacking up 3s without getting pressured to get in and mix it up inside. HE IS NOT A CENTRE NOR A REBOUNDER. So why not play to his strengths?
I am already resigned to the fact that Smitch will never pull out Bargs out of the starting line up ( which will always equate to getting beat on the rebounding ) so why not put an additional rebounder to augment that issue.
And there is no way we don't score with that line up as alluded to by some of you. Bargs can be himself jacking up 3s without getting pressured to get in and mix it up inside. HE IS NOT A CENTRE NOR A REBOUNDER. So why not play to his strengths?
- Boogie!
- RealGM
- Posts: 66,186
- And1: 55,926
- Joined: Oct 27, 2005
- Location: Ba da da da daaaaaa. If you build it, they will come!
- Contact:
-
- Bryans_Collar
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,558
- And1: 0
- Joined: Nov 14, 2007
- Location: Toronto
Meh, I just see that as a potential recipe for disaster if it gets CB4 in foul trouble.
I don't want him exposed to crap fouls guarding 3's or getting extra junk giving too much help D to Bargs.
Rebounding with Bargs & Bosh on the court can only be improved by Bargs improving or getting an upgrade on AP at some point in the future.
I don't want him exposed to crap fouls guarding 3's or getting extra junk giving too much help D to Bargs.
Rebounding with Bargs & Bosh on the court can only be improved by Bargs improving or getting an upgrade on AP at some point in the future.
Bargnani PER
2007 - 12.9
2008 - 10.7
Hollinger predicted 2009 - 11.8
Bryans_Collar HOPES FOR 2009 - 17.0
2007 - 12.9
2008 - 10.7
Hollinger predicted 2009 - 11.8
Bryans_Collar HOPES FOR 2009 - 17.0