Are the Lakers going back to the Finals?

Moderators: bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake

Will the Addition of Gasol Take the Lakers back to the Finals?

Yes
109
36%
No
65
21%
All depends on Chemistry
66
22%
All depends on Chemistry
66
22%
 
Total votes: 306

Bgil
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,812
And1: 1
Joined: Dec 16, 2005

 

Post#101 » by Bgil » Sat Feb 2, 2008 7:04 pm

the Spurs more closely it's not like they just gained any type of new, significant advantage IMO.


LOL. In previous years they've been letting Timmy roam and sag on D because Kwame wasn't going to do much on O. Can't say the same about Gasol.

Who guards Odom now? He roasts Duncan on D by driving right around him but now they're gonna put Manu on him. He's gonna grab every fricken rebound now.
Pop's defensive plan against us has been to double team Odom in the post and have Manu flop at every opportunity. I don't think that's gonna work now that we have Fisher (who has murdered the Spurs PLENTY of times) Bynum, and Gasol.

Oh yeah, who guards Bynum? Oberto? That'll be fun.

Gasol takes enormous pressure off of Odom, and Bynum because you have to cover him with your best post guy on D and you can't double team him because everyone else will either light you up or dominate the boards.

Gasol and Bynum are helpless in trying to slow Duncan


Bynum does a solid job and Turiaf does a really good job. He gave Duncan hell the last time we played and is quickly turning into a fantastic defender.
I still think the Spurs probably beat us in 6-7 due to superior coaching... assuming they get back to championship form and stop playing like crap.

--------
Gasol should take to the triangle easily. center/pf is the easiest position in the system and if Ariza can pick it up at SF in a couple weeks then Gasol should have no problem.
"I'm sure they'll jump off the bandwagon. Then when we do get back on top, they're going to want to jump back on, and we're going to tell them there's no more room." - Kobe in March of 2005
User avatar
garcia3
Starter
Posts: 2,448
And1: 9
Joined: Jul 30, 2004
Location: Puerto Rico
Contact:

 

Post#102 » by garcia3 » Sat Feb 2, 2008 7:23 pm

humblebum wrote:I completely agree with the "Big 2" comments. Bynum is like the Center version of Rajon Rondo. A super freakish athlete at his position but not quite polished and not at all consistent (I've seen Kendrick Perkins lock him up and throw away the key TWICE).


:rofl: hahahahha what a stupid post!! Come on, ok, Bynum's still a bit raw, but to say he isn't AT ALL CONSISTENT is just plain STUPID. You can look up the stats if you want to, but after Kwame went down with the injury and he got the starting role you could count on Bynum to have at least a 14/10 night every single game. I mean, one of the reasons us Laker fans were so high on him this season was because of his consistensy, so please, don't come here with that crap
Image
User avatar
Nashty
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,397
And1: 61
Joined: Sep 03, 2006
Location: Nash's House

 

Post#103 » by Nashty » Sat Feb 2, 2008 7:29 pm

No, gasol is overrated and kobe won't pass to him anyways. Lakers are pretenders, nothing more. People overreacting way too much over the trade.
User avatar
kno
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,495
And1: 24
Joined: Nov 07, 2004

 

Post#104 » by kno » Sat Feb 2, 2008 7:31 pm

Nashty wrote:No, gasol is overrated and kobe won't pass to him anyways. Lakers are pretenders, nothing more. People overreacting way too much over the trade.


Hey, youre back.

:wave:
Image
User avatar
TheCardinal20
Junior
Posts: 468
And1: 20
Joined: Apr 11, 2007

 

Post#105 » by TheCardinal20 » Sat Feb 2, 2008 7:35 pm

Not going to happen this year, as there isn't close to enough time for them to gel, next year is a different story...
magicfan4life05
RealGM
Posts: 23,617
And1: 198
Joined: Jun 29, 2005
Location: Welcome back the Comeback King !

 

Post#106 » by magicfan4life05 » Sat Feb 2, 2008 7:35 pm

wheres this speculation about bynum being out the rest of the season coming from? first time ive heard of it, i cant wait to see him back and hope for the best...
Dwight Howard on his FT struggles:

"I just think everybody needs to stop talking about it," Howard said. "There's more to life than free throws."
User avatar
Veez
Pro Prospect
Posts: 771
And1: 192
Joined: Mar 28, 2006

 

Post#107 » by Veez » Sat Feb 2, 2008 8:13 pm

man..some of you posters need to stop posting..all its doing is showing your true intelligence..which in your case is not benficial to you..comparing finley to odom..wtf is the matter with you..."odom is not a big 4 type" yea yea..let me go ahead and break this down for you using arithmetic:
when kobe and odom were together..odom was a 2nd option..so it was the BIG 2..then came bynum's emergence...which took pressure off of Odom..which made it the BIG 3..get ready for it now...THEN came Gasol..and hes already an established baller in this league..which..with Kobe AND Bynum AND odom..makes it the BIG 4...comprende?? you got that? wasnt that hard was it
Taiwan Killa
Banned User
Posts: 1,027
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 31, 2007

 

Post#108 » by Taiwan Killa » Sat Feb 2, 2008 8:17 pm

I think the only team that can really matchup with the Lakers now are the Mavs believe it or not.

The Lakers had the Suns on the verge of elimination with Luke, Smush, and Kwame as starters, sure the Suns didn't have Amare or a better Barbosa but the Lakers didn't have Bynum, Gasol, Fisher, Farmar, Ariza, a better Sasha, and Radmonovic.

The Spurs can no longer sag of Kwame, instead they'll have to legitametly guard Gasol. Not to mention 6' 10'' Odom will be single covered by 6' 6'' Manu, and Kobe will have enough energy now to play defense on Manu. And Bynum, Turiaf, and Gasol on Duncan is about as good as you're gonna get besides probably Sheed and Mcdyess on Duncan. It's not like anyone on the Suns or Mavs are legit post defenders yet people say they have a chance against the Spurs yet the Lakers don't.

Back to my point though, the Mavs IMO have the best chance of beating the Lakers. They're just as deep and have just as many scoring options. Kobe and Eddie Jones is a good matchup, Dirk and Gasol, Diop and Bynum, Odom and Howard, Harris and Fisher, and both teams have deep benches.
User avatar
ImmortalD24
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,170
And1: 655
Joined: Apr 11, 2007

 

Post#109 » by ImmortalD24 » Sat Feb 2, 2008 8:44 pm

The Lakers are officially the best team in the league, and 2nd place isn't even close.
Iwasawitness wrote:Dude, swap prime LeBron with Mitchell and this would be the best team LeBron ever played on.
Alex_De_Large
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,718
And1: 45
Joined: May 05, 2007

 

Post#110 » by Alex_De_Large » Sat Feb 2, 2008 8:45 pm

Amare can't stop gasol and bynum, there is no way he can, if he can't defend al jefferson..... enough said.
User avatar
kno
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,495
And1: 24
Joined: Nov 07, 2004

 

Post#111 » by kno » Sat Feb 2, 2008 8:58 pm

Taiwan Killa wrote:I think the only team that can really matchup with the Lakers now are the Mavs believe it or not.



Boston is still pretty scary.

I mean, Perkins dominated Bynum this season.
Image
humblebum
Banned User
Posts: 11,727
And1: 1,755
Joined: Jan 20, 2005

 

Post#112 » by humblebum » Sat Feb 2, 2008 9:17 pm

Trixx wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Boston is still pretty scary.

I mean, Perkins dominated Bynum this season.


The funny thing is that Perkins has rendered Bynum completely ineffective on two separate occasions. Perkins is an underrated role player. He's got good size for a center, good length, he understands team defense and has solid man-on-man defensive positioning, forcing players off the block and challenging shots as they leave the player's hand. Bynum is one of those guys who will have a tough time scoring over Perkins... it's just a pretty even matchup. So that's what I meant about consistency. If he can't get the job done against a solid role playing center like Perkins then that's not the type of "consistency" that really matters in terms of winning championships. Color me unimpressed.

My best guess at how to defend the Lakers considering their going to have a stellar offense? Your going to have to use some zone while obviously giving Kobe the lion's share of your defensive attention. Your also going to need two capable low post defenders (Perk and KG for Boston, Sheed and Dyess for Detroit, Duncan and Oberto for SA).

No one's saying the Lakers aren't one of the best teams but it's certainly not clear that they're better than the Spurs, Celtics, or the Pistons.
humblebum
Banned User
Posts: 11,727
And1: 1,755
Joined: Jan 20, 2005

 

Post#113 » by humblebum » Sat Feb 2, 2008 9:20 pm

I'd also add that Boston has shown that they were clearly, clearly better in a heads up matchup before this deal. Do you want to disagree with that? This deal will definitely close the gap but I don't see where they have any type of significant advantage against Boston, San Antonio or Detroit. They're now completely in the discussion for top team in the NBA but any of these teams can win the Championship if things fall right for them.
User avatar
kno
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,495
And1: 24
Joined: Nov 07, 2004

 

Post#114 » by kno » Sat Feb 2, 2008 9:23 pm

humblebum wrote: If he can't get the job done against a solid role playing center like Perkins then that's not the type of "consistency" that really matters in terms of winning championships. Color me unimpressed.



Nah, I dont think not being able ti produce against one player should consider you inconsistent.

He's virtually dominated every other big manb he's faced. Not being abe to dominate one C shouldnt crown him the inconsistent title.
Image
Phil Jackson
Banned User
Posts: 1,758
And1: 8
Joined: Jul 05, 2006

 

Post#115 » by Phil Jackson » Sat Feb 2, 2008 9:30 pm

They were going back to the Finals before they got Gasol.
humblebum
Banned User
Posts: 11,727
And1: 1,755
Joined: Jan 20, 2005

 

Post#116 » by humblebum » Sat Feb 2, 2008 9:31 pm

Trixx wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Nah, I dont think not being able ti produce against one player should consider you inconsistent.

He's virtually dominated every other big manb he's faced. Not being abe to dominate one C shouldnt crown him the inconsistent title.


How's he done against Duncan or Rasheed Wallace?

All I'm saying is that he looked completely unimpressive against Perkins, which isn't really surprising to Celtics fans but most fans around the NBA would be surprised. Perkins is the type of defensive C that Bynum is going to have to succeed against if the Lakers are to be a true championship contender. To me he seems like a solid C who benefits from the increased attention that goes towards Kobe. He doesn't have a great knack for scoring the rock and he's a below average defender. He's got lots of upside, sure, but is he good enough right now to excel against the top defenses, and top interior defenders? As far as his performances against the Celtics, the answer would have to be a resounding no. Shoot, he didn't really have ANY impact in either of those games. Big time players don't disappear like that in big games.

(The Lakers played both games like it was the Championship... so NO EXCUSES)
Phil Jackson
Banned User
Posts: 1,758
And1: 8
Joined: Jul 05, 2006

 

Post#117 » by Phil Jackson » Sat Feb 2, 2008 9:43 pm

ss_maverick wrote:I think the Lakers have a chance for sure.

But where is this "Big 4" coming from? Gasol and Bryant, that's two I'm willing to accept. Bynum is good but not even a star yet, not at all some one who I would consider part of the Big 4. And Odom is just crap, seriously only a week ago Laker fans were complaining about how crap he was with names like "Odumb" flying around.

Now, don't take this as me hating. On Dallas we pretty much have a big 1 or maybe a big 2, so this ain't me hating, just saying that the "Big 4" is kinda ridiculous.


Kobe Bryant counts for 2.5, Gasol counts for 1 and Odom and Bynum count for 0.25.
User avatar
Triangle Theory
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,802
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 24, 2006

 

Post#118 » by Triangle Theory » Sat Feb 2, 2008 9:48 pm

humblebum wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



How's he done against Duncan or Rasheed Wallace?

All I'm saying is that he looked completely unimpressive against Perkins, which isn't really surprising to Celtics fans but most fans around the NBA would be surprised. Perkins is the type of defensive C that Bynum is going to have to succeed against if the Lakers are to be a true championship contender. To me he seems like a solid C who benefits from the increased attention that goes towards Kobe. He doesn't have a great knack for scoring the rock and he's a below average defender. He's got lots of upside, sure, but is he good enough right now to excel against the top defenses, and top interior defenders? As far as his performances against the Celtics, the answer would have to be a resounding no. Shoot, he didn't really have ANY impact in either of those games. Big time players don't disappear like that in big games.

(The Lakers played both games like it was the Championship... so NO EXCUSES)


Whats funny is that Bynum is so young, and everyone wants to write him off when talking about a Laker Champ this year. Because he struggled against perkins? Okay? Every player in their prime has struggles, let alone a 21 year old who is currently injured. lol. Lakers to the finals.
Image
BRINGTHEPAIN wrote:Paul is the best player in the NBA. Nobody does it better at both ends.

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
B-Scott
Head Coach
Posts: 7,180
And1: 94
Joined: Dec 22, 2005
Location: Los Angeles California

 

Post#119 » by B-Scott » Sat Feb 2, 2008 9:48 pm

Mitch should get GM of the last 3 years for building this team

Gasol, Farmar, Bynum, Turiaf, Sasha, Ariza

He's responisble for all of these players
User avatar
celticfan42487
RealGM
Posts: 27,524
And1: 15,354
Joined: Jul 22, 2005
Location: Billerica, MA
       

 

Post#120 » by celticfan42487 » Sat Feb 2, 2008 9:58 pm

so Kobe wants to be traded right?
Image

Return to The General Board