Rondo and other starting Point Guards

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

brown_kids
Junior
Posts: 361
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 08, 2007

Rondo and other starting Point Guards 

Post#1 » by brown_kids » Wed Feb 6, 2008 2:19 am

My friend (raps4life~) and I were having an argument about Rondo.

He feels that Rondo is a bottom 10 starting PG in the league. I, on the other hand, feel Rondo's great defense makes up for his lack of play making skills, and he is a decent starting PG in the league. I would rank him in the middle of the pack, per haps 11-16.

What is your opinion on this? Where does he rank among starting PG's?
risktaker91
Banned User
Posts: 2,487
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 18, 2007

 

Post#2 » by risktaker91 » Wed Feb 6, 2008 2:24 am

Obviously everyone with a brain would agree with you. Rondo is a great PG, and still is improving. He's definetely in the 11-16 range and I can only see him getting better.
brown_kids
Junior
Posts: 361
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 08, 2007

 

Post#3 » by brown_kids » Wed Feb 6, 2008 2:30 am

raps4life~ also believes Raymond Felton is a superior PG than Rondo as well.

He also feels Hinrich is having a better season.

Also, he thinks alston + blake + telfair own Rondo, is he just a hater?
Derekman
Banned User
Posts: 2,832
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 08, 2007
Location: 519

 

Post#4 » by Derekman » Wed Feb 6, 2008 2:46 am

not 11-16, probably more like 15-19:

no order, better than him:

nash
kidd
paul
deron
iverson
gilbert
felton
calderon
ford
harris
terry
parker
billups
baron
miller


Thats 15 better than him. ( Im sure i'm missing someone)
-bob-
RealGM
Posts: 19,991
And1: 41
Joined: Jan 03, 2004
       

 

Post#5 » by -bob- » Wed Feb 6, 2008 2:48 am

I can't name 10 teams he would start on so.. bottom 10 seems right.
User avatar
OmniDEN
Starter
Posts: 2,365
And1: 68
Joined: Mar 17, 2006

 

Post#6 » by OmniDEN » Wed Feb 6, 2008 2:50 am

He's most def bottom 10.
brown_kids
Junior
Posts: 361
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 08, 2007

 

Post#7 » by brown_kids » Wed Feb 6, 2008 2:51 am

But come on, wouldnt you rather have Rondo than alston or blake or telfair?
SactownHrtBrks8
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,978
And1: 68
Joined: Jun 10, 2004
 

 

Post#8 » by SactownHrtBrks8 » Wed Feb 6, 2008 2:53 am

Bottom 10 there are backup players that would start over him if on the a Celtics

He does have potential tho.
User avatar
raps4life~
General Manager
Posts: 7,664
And1: 25
Joined: Mar 13, 2007
Location: California
       

 

Post#9 » by raps4life~ » Wed Feb 6, 2008 2:53 am

brown_kids wrote:But come on, wouldnt you rather have Rondo than alston or blake or telfair?




i didnt want this to be posted becuase i wasnt sure how it would recieved by some fans. im glad some people agree with me.


honestly, i believe that IN BOSTON Alston and Telfair would be better.
User avatar
sule
RealGM
Posts: 14,360
And1: 34,217
Joined: Nov 11, 2006
     

 

Post#10 » by sule » Wed Feb 6, 2008 3:12 am

Out of the 40 players qualified (as in played enough minutes to count) for the As/TO stat on ESPN, we have:

Jose Calderon, TOR

Brevin Knight, LAC
Anthony Johnson, ATL
Chris Paul, NOR
Steve Blake, POR
Jason Williams, MIA
Chauncey Billups, DET
Chris Duhon, CHI
Sebastian Telfair, MIN
Antonio Daniels, WAS
Anthony Carter, DEN
Steve Nash, PHO
Jeff McInnis, CHA
Baron Davis, GSW
Earl Watson, SEA
T.J. Ford, TOR
Carlos Arroyo, ORL
Jason Kidd, NJN
Deron Williams, UTH

Rajon Rondo, BOS
Raymond Felton, CHA
Jason Terry, DAL
Rafer Alston, HOU
Jamaal Tinsley, IND
Kirk Hinrich, CHI
Derek Fisher, LAL
Mo Williams, MIL
Andre Miller, PHI
Jameer Nelson, ORL
Tony Parker, SAS
Devin Harris, DAL
Sam Cassell, LAC

Jannero Pargo, NOR
Nate Robinson, NYK
Marko Jaric, MIN
Kyle Lowry, MEM
Louis Williams, PHI
Jordan Farmar, LAL
Beno Udrih, SAC
Daniel Gibson, CLE

i would clearly take the bolded players....i think thats 17 Point Guards...and thats not even considering players who could play the point, but aren't listed here that i would likely take ahead of Rondo, like Barbosa, Iverson, Brandon Roy, and maybe a couple others...

so yeah...i'll put him in the bottom 10....

i think having the Big 3 on his team hides his weaknesses and causes him to look better than he may be. Though playing with those players will certainly help him become better over time.
User avatar
MVP16
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,342
And1: 3
Joined: Mar 05, 2006

 

Post#11 » by MVP16 » Wed Feb 6, 2008 3:49 am

sule wrote:i think having the Big 3 on his team hides his weaknesses and causes him to look better than he may be. Though playing with those players will certainly help him become better over time.


That's not true IMO. Playing with the big 3 hurts his game since he's much more tentative and has less opportunities to penetrate and run...which are his strengths. Instead, Rondo is forced to take more jumpers and even though he is open, it's not one of his strengths. In games where at least 1 one the big 3 was out, Rondo's stats have been:

Points...Assists...Rebounds....Steals
20............2..........7.................1
20............4.........12................0
23............3..........6.................1
15............5..........5.................6
17............8..........4.................1
14............4..........2.................2
13............4..........3.................1
TheOUTLAW
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 41,920
And1: 2,757
Joined: Aug 23, 2002
     

 

Post#12 » by TheOUTLAW » Wed Feb 6, 2008 4:14 am

He's not a bad player, but he's still likely in the bottom ten.
UncleDrew wrote: I get Buckets!
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,267
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

 

Post#13 » by skones » Wed Feb 6, 2008 6:16 am

1. Chris Paul
2. Steve Nash
3. Deron Williams
4. Baron Davis
5. Gilbert Arenas
6. Chauncey Billups
7. Jason Kidd
8. Tony Parker
9. Jose Calderon
10. TJ Ford
11. Mo Williams
12. Jamaal Tinsley
13. Andre Miller
14. Kirk Hinrich
15. Devin Harris
16. Jason Terry
17. Leandro Barbosa
18. Mike Bibby
19. Monta Ellis
20. Jameer Nelson
21. Raymond Felton

I'd currently take all of those guys over Rondo on my team. So yes bottom 10.

EDIT: Sure you have guys like Ford/Calderon, Ellis, and Terry sprinkled in there but with other guys being arguable, you really can't make a strong case for him being in the top 18.
jdub114
Junior
Posts: 440
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 27, 2006

Re: Rondo and other starting Point Guards 

Post#14 » by jdub114 » Wed Feb 6, 2008 6:47 am

brown_kids wrote:My friend (raps4life~) and I were having an argument about Rondo.

He feels that Rondo is a bottom 10 starting PG in the league. I, on the other hand, feel Rondo's great defense makes up for his lack of play making skills, and he is a decent starting PG in the league. I would rank him in the middle of the pack, per haps 11-16.

What is your opinion on this? Where does he rank among starting PG's?


His D hasn't been as good as advertised as he has been LIT up by many PG's this season
"One plus one is two, all day long, and it’s never gonna change. And that’s factorial." - Starbury
User avatar
Cammo101
Mr. Mock Draft
Posts: 30,848
And1: 2,009
Joined: Feb 11, 2006
Location: Austin, TX
     

 

Post#15 » by Cammo101 » Wed Feb 6, 2008 7:54 am

Rondo is deffinately a bottom 10 PG, but you are right that he is improving and has a bright future.
User avatar
ponder276
Head Coach
Posts: 6,075
And1: 67
Joined: Oct 14, 2007

 

Post#16 » by ponder276 » Wed Feb 6, 2008 8:07 am

He's young, and is only going to get better, but at this point he is maybe a bottom ten starter. Ignoring injuries, I'd say he could start on the following teams:

New York (Marbury)
Cleveland (Hughes)
Atlanta (Johnson)
Miami (Williams)
Memphis (Conley?)
Houston (Alston)
Seattle (Watson)
Minnesota (Telfair)
Portland (Blake?)
and Denver if you don't count Iverson as the starting PG

If he's better than these 10-11 starting PGs (and it's questionable with a few of them), that makes him a bottom 11 to bottom 12 PG.
User avatar
biscuitsNgrady
Junior
Posts: 292
And1: 10
Joined: Nov 04, 2007
Location: SoCal

 

Post#17 » by biscuitsNgrady » Wed Feb 6, 2008 8:43 am

^I'd definitely take Steve Blake over Rondo. & I don't think Rondo has the 3 point range that's needed to start for Houston or Cleveland.
User avatar
Teddy KGB
General Manager
Posts: 9,306
And1: 1
Joined: Nov 03, 2006
Location: London, United Kingdom
Contact:

 

Post#18 » by Teddy KGB » Wed Feb 6, 2008 12:30 pm

No better than bottom 5. His defense is tremendously overrated and he hasn't got much offensive game.

Still though, will get better in the future but I don't ever see him as any more than an average PG
Formerly ss_maverick, JHos Hydro
User avatar
hermes
RealGM
Posts: 96,562
And1: 25,529
Joined: Aug 27, 2007
Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
 

 

Post#19 » by hermes » Wed Feb 6, 2008 2:20 pm

TheOUTLAW wrote:He's not a bad player, but he's still likely in the bottom ten.
User avatar
kandiking
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,551
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 21, 2007

 

Post#20 » by kandiking » Wed Feb 6, 2008 3:37 pm

100% bottom 10
Vindicater wrote:KWSN-Men is by far my favourite poster on realgm. He just takes so much punishment and just keeps coming back for more.

Return to Player Comparisons