Should the Raptors have gone after Shaq ?
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Should the Raptors have gone after Shaq ?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 936
- And1: 1
- Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Should the Raptors have gone after Shaq ?
T.J. Ford
Rasho
Dixon
Baston (or Graham)
for
Shaq
Chris Quinn
I don't know, but with Calderon blossoming like he does, T.J. would have been expandable. And still, T.J. is young and could have given Wade some relief at the PG position, which is what Miami is looking for. Miami would also save some money because Dixon expires after this season, while Rasho and Maceo do after next season.
The Raps obviously would get Shaq, a physical presence down low that they are missing for so long. With the shooting that the Raptors have, Shaq would have been a pretty good fit. He'd probably mesh well with Bosh and Bargnani as well, since they aren't prototypical lowpost banger. Adding Shaq would also shed the label of a pure jumpshooting team.
Then the Heat would throw in Chris Quinn, who is nothing special but still can hit the open three pointer and give Calderon 10-15 minutes of rest every game, while running the offense better than what Dixon has shown.
Having Shaq would have given Mitchell something to expirement with in the line up. He could either go traditionally with Bargnani off the bench:
Calderon
Parker
Moon
Bosh
Shaq
or he could go massively big:
Calderon
Parker
Bargnani
Bosh
Shaq
I don't know, but if I was BC I would have taken a look at this deal.
Rasho
Dixon
Baston (or Graham)
for
Shaq
Chris Quinn
I don't know, but with Calderon blossoming like he does, T.J. would have been expandable. And still, T.J. is young and could have given Wade some relief at the PG position, which is what Miami is looking for. Miami would also save some money because Dixon expires after this season, while Rasho and Maceo do after next season.
The Raps obviously would get Shaq, a physical presence down low that they are missing for so long. With the shooting that the Raptors have, Shaq would have been a pretty good fit. He'd probably mesh well with Bosh and Bargnani as well, since they aren't prototypical lowpost banger. Adding Shaq would also shed the label of a pure jumpshooting team.
Then the Heat would throw in Chris Quinn, who is nothing special but still can hit the open three pointer and give Calderon 10-15 minutes of rest every game, while running the offense better than what Dixon has shown.
Having Shaq would have given Mitchell something to expirement with in the line up. He could either go traditionally with Bargnani off the bench:
Calderon
Parker
Moon
Bosh
Shaq
or he could go massively big:
Calderon
Parker
Bargnani
Bosh
Shaq
I don't know, but if I was BC I would have taken a look at this deal.
- hksazn
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,514
- And1: 37
- Joined: Jun 13, 2006
- Location: Toronto
- Contact:
-
- Senior
- Posts: 633
- And1: 210
- Joined: Nov 30, 2003
Mr. Savage wrote:Yeah, but what would the Raps lose ?
With Calderon showing what he can do, it appears as he can be the full time PG, which makes TJ tradeable. We have seen how the raps can be even without TJ.
Rasho would be the only other rotation player that'd be given up and his void would be filled by Shaq.
you underestimated how Forderon makes the team that much better. Since TJ's injury, guys like Kapono, Delfino, Bargnani, and the team as a whole sometimes have struggle. Due to the fact that Dixon and Martin couldn't distribute or makes plays for them. Kapono couldn't find open shots, Delfino has to create himself and sometimes jack up the ball like crazy. .....we need the 48min of solid PG .....
- ICEMANRC
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,648
- And1: 49
- Joined: Dec 12, 2007
I think the Suns made a bad trade, but it could be vindicated if they end up winning the ring.
Raps making this trade? I'd have to say "Hell no" on that one. We still wouldn't be a contender, and we would would be mortgaging our future for pretty much nothing.
Raps making this trade? I'd have to say "Hell no" on that one. We still wouldn't be a contender, and we would would be mortgaging our future for pretty much nothing.

I may technically be a "coach", but I have been around for years.
- miruss2001
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,064
- And1: 335
- Joined: Apr 27, 2005
- Location: Patrolling the neutral zone
- chsh22
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,252
- And1: 1
- Joined: Aug 22, 2007
- Location: The Watcher
Should they have? No. Could we have? Realistically, no. Even if the salaries match that's a lot of roster depth we're giving up for a guy who won't bring us a championship. With phoenix, the rest of the parts are there and the move probably makes them favourites in the West, provided Shaq plays games.
theonlyeastcoastrapsfan wrote:If you were going to give the raps board an enema, you'd stick the tube in this thread.
- TheMainEvent
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,088
- And1: 1,829
- Joined: Jun 23, 2007
- Location: Mississauga
- La princesa
- Junior
- Posts: 455
- And1: 3
- Joined: Nov 10, 2007
- Location: Brampton ,On,Canada
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 70,059
- And1: 33,938
- Joined: Jul 25, 2005
-
miruss2001 wrote:Not Shaq but we should have Marion. Rasho, Kapono and Dixon do it by the trade checker.
It's too bad that the trade checker isn't a euphemism for "Steve Kerr".
9. Similarly, IF THOU HAST SPENT the entire offseason predicting that thy team will stink, thou shalt not gloat, nor even be happy, shouldst thou turn out to be correct. Realistic analysis is fine, but be a fan first, a smug smarty-pants second.
Return to Trades and Transactions