Should the Raptors have gone after Shaq ?
Moderators: MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 52,083
- And1: 50,740
- Joined: Jan 08, 2006
- Location: Pat's Homestyle Jamaican Restaurant. Shouts to Sheryl's Caribbean Cuisine
- Contact:
-
Re: Should the Raptors have gone after Shaq ?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,920
- And1: 510
- Joined: Nov 22, 2002
- Location: I LIVE... IN A VAN... DOWN BY THE RIVERRRR!!!
Re: Should the Raptors have gone after Shaq ?
Mr. Savage wrote:T.J. Ford
Rasho
Dixon
Baston (or Graham)
for
Shaq
Chris Quinn
I don't know, but with Calderon blossoming like he does, T.J. would have been expandable. And still, T.J. is young and could have given Wade some relief at the PG position, which is what Miami is looking for. Miami would also save some money because Dixon expires after this season, while Rasho and Maceo do after next season.
The Raps obviously would get Shaq, a physical presence down low that they are missing for so long. With the shooting that the Raptors have, Shaq would have been a pretty good fit. He'd probably mesh well with Bosh and Bargnani as well, since they aren't prototypical lowpost banger. Adding Shaq would also shed the label of a pure jumpshooting team.
Then the Heat would throw in Chris Quinn, who is nothing special but still can hit the open three pointer and give Calderon 10-15 minutes of rest every game, while running the offense better than what Dixon has shown.
Having Shaq would have given Mitchell something to expirement with in the line up. He could either go traditionally with Bargnani off the bench:
Calderon
Parker
Moon
Bosh
Shaq
or he could go massively big:
Calderon
Parker
Bargnani
Bosh
Shaq
I don't know, but if I was BC I would have taken a look at this deal.
I knew this thread was inevitable, but that didn't stop me from throwing up in my mouth just a little when I saw it.
-
- Senior Mod - Raptors
- Posts: 19,266
- And1: 5,736
- Joined: Jun 29, 2005
- Location: Section 118
-
Shaq is a declining asset,
If we traded for Shaq it would have been to compete today right now this season, and even with Shaq I don't think we would have had enough gas to even win the east.
Then which Shaq shows up next season? or the season after?
Its a short term fix for a problem we will have again in a season or two.
I would much rather BC stick to the plan and build a strong core of player who will learn to play together (ala the Pistons) then trade for quick fixes.
If we traded for Shaq it would have been to compete today right now this season, and even with Shaq I don't think we would have had enough gas to even win the east.
Then which Shaq shows up next season? or the season after?
Its a short term fix for a problem we will have again in a season or two.
I would much rather BC stick to the plan and build a strong core of player who will learn to play together (ala the Pistons) then trade for quick fixes.
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 20,964
- And1: 3,423
- Joined: Dec 29, 2005
- Location: Jurassic Park
-
You don't trade a 24 year old PG for a massive contract like Shaq who would kill your cap plans.
Shaq is washed up and it's a one year rental for him I bet. The Suns are contenders we are not so why would Shaq want to come here? Shaq isn't what he used to be and looks washed up and dosn't have it anymore.
Shaq is washed up and it's a one year rental for him I bet. The Suns are contenders we are not so why would Shaq want to come here? Shaq isn't what he used to be and looks washed up and dosn't have it anymore.
Lord Leoshes wrote:i personally would rather keep Chalmers over Lowry
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,566
- And1: 2,002
- Joined: Mar 02, 2001
- Contact:
Return to Trades and Transactions