Shaq's Legacy

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

Mad Balla 15
RealGM
Posts: 10,401
And1: 1,932
Joined: Nov 16, 2003

Shaq's Legacy 

Post#1 » by Mad Balla 15 » Wed Feb 6, 2008 3:20 pm

Big if here, but IF the Suns somehow win the championship with Shaq how does that affect his legacy? That will mean he has gone to the finals with each of the 4 teams he has been on and has won a title with 3 of them. I know this isn't the same Shaq as before but would this make his legacy better, or keep it the same? It would seem that whatever team has traded for him has benefitted with at least one ring pending on whether the Suns win it or not. What do you guys think?
gswhoops
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 34,641
And1: 6,305
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
   

 

Post#2 » by gswhoops » Wed Feb 6, 2008 3:26 pm

If Shaq can win a 'ship in Phoenix, he will cement his legacy as perhaps the greatest C in the history of the league.

5 championships with 3 different teams, including one that was infamous for folding like a lawn chair in the playoffs, plus career stats of 25/11/3/2.5 blocks per game...hard to argue against that.
User avatar
mudyez
Analyst
Posts: 3,123
And1: 3
Joined: Mar 18, 2004
Location: parts unknown

 

Post#3 » by mudyez » Wed Feb 6, 2008 3:48 pm

for a second I thought: wow, did a player ever win 3 chips with 3 different teams?

then BOB came in an slapped me in the pace
Image
Image
magicfan4life05
RealGM
Posts: 23,617
And1: 198
Joined: Jun 29, 2005
Location: Welcome back the Comeback King !

 

Post#4 » by magicfan4life05 » Wed Feb 6, 2008 3:50 pm

that's not bob!
Dwight Howard on his FT struggles:

"I just think everybody needs to stop talking about it," Howard said. "There's more to life than free throws."
User avatar
tclg
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,194
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 15, 2007
Location: Chicago

 

Post#5 » by tclg » Wed Feb 6, 2008 5:27 pm

He would probably move up in the Goat discussions but not by much
NetsForce
Banned User
Posts: 20,711
And1: 29
Joined: Dec 27, 2006

 

Post#6 » by NetsForce » Wed Feb 6, 2008 5:30 pm

It won't affect his legacy much he'll always be remembered as one of the greatest big men to play the game (who needed a great wing player to help lead him to a championship).
tkb
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,759
And1: 198
Joined: Mar 19, 2005
Location: Norway
   

 

Post#7 » by tkb » Wed Feb 6, 2008 6:22 pm

gswhoops wrote:If Shaq can win a 'ship in Phoenix, he will cement his legacy as perhaps the greatest C in the history of the league.

5 championships with 3 different teams, including one that was infamous for folding like a lawn chair in the playoffs, plus career stats of 25/11/3/2.5 blocks per game...hard to argue against that.


Not really when you look at the other candidates. Shaq if he won a championship with Phx would still not be a top 3 center ever (having said that he is, and has been for a while a top 5 center in history).
User avatar
kooldude
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,823
And1: 78
Joined: Jul 08, 2007

 

Post#8 » by kooldude » Wed Feb 6, 2008 6:38 pm

^what if Shaq won 2 titles with Phx and wins 2 Finals MVP or just 1 Finals MVP
Warspite wrote:I still would take Mitch (Richmond) over just about any SG playing today. His peak is better than 2011 Kobe and with 90s rules hes better than Wade.


Jordan23Forever wrote:People are delusional.
tkb
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,759
And1: 198
Joined: Mar 19, 2005
Location: Norway
   

 

Post#9 » by tkb » Wed Feb 6, 2008 7:58 pm

He still faces some sick competition in Kareem, Wilt and Bill Russell, and I'd probably still rate them all over him.

He'd probably be rated over Hakeem tho for the 4th spot, which is debatable right now.
User avatar
kooldude
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,823
And1: 78
Joined: Jul 08, 2007

 

Post#10 » by kooldude » Wed Feb 6, 2008 8:05 pm

But doesn't Shaq's statistical advantage and rings, win over Hareem atm?
Warspite wrote:I still would take Mitch (Richmond) over just about any SG playing today. His peak is better than 2011 Kobe and with 90s rules hes better than Wade.


Jordan23Forever wrote:People are delusional.
Patterns
Banned User
Posts: 6,008
And1: 18
Joined: Sep 19, 2007

 

Post#11 » by Patterns » Wed Feb 6, 2008 8:06 pm

tkb wrote:He still faces some sick competition in Kareem, Wilt and Bill Russell, and I'd probably still rate them all over him.

He'd probably be rated over Hakeem tho for the 4th spot, which is debatable right now.

It's not even a question that Shaq is better than Hakeem and I am a Shaq hater.
User avatar
mudyez
Analyst
Posts: 3,123
And1: 3
Joined: Mar 18, 2004
Location: parts unknown

 

Post#12 » by mudyez » Wed Feb 6, 2008 9:10 pm

magicfan4life05 wrote:that's not bob!


you can ask my little brother and he will tell you, that its BOB!

big-gut-bob

then...I have to admit, that I dont even have a little brother :(
Image
tkb
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,759
And1: 198
Joined: Mar 19, 2005
Location: Norway
   

 

Post#13 » by tkb » Wed Feb 6, 2008 9:24 pm

Patterns wrote:It's not even a question that Shaq is better than Hakeem and I am a Shaq hater.


If you completely ignore defense, sure.
User avatar
WesWesley
General Manager
Posts: 8,002
And1: 5
Joined: Apr 06, 2006
Location: TORONTO

 

Post#14 » by WesWesley » Wed Feb 6, 2008 9:50 pm

tkb wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



If you completely ignore defense, sure.


Shaq wasn't exactly a stiff on defense. In his prime he was a dominant two way player.

you can make the argument that he has had a better more celebrated career than Akeem.
5:26 LAC - B. Davis misses a layup
User avatar
exkonvict
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,251
And1: 1
Joined: Nov 02, 2006
Location: The OC, California
Contact:

Re: Shaq's Legacy 

Post#15 » by exkonvict » Wed Feb 6, 2008 11:47 pm

Mad Balla 15 wrote:Big if here, but IF the Suns somehow win the championship with Shaq how does that affect his legacy? That will mean he has gone to the finals with each of the 4 teams he has been on and has won a title with 3 of them. I know this isn't the same Shaq as before but would this make his legacy better, or keep it the same? It would seem that whatever team has traded for him has benefitted with at least one ring pending on whether the Suns win it or not. What do you guys think?


He would be the GREATEST PLAYER OF ALL TIME!!! G.O.A.T.!!!
tkb
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,759
And1: 198
Joined: Mar 19, 2005
Location: Norway
   

 

Post#16 » by tkb » Thu Feb 7, 2008 12:51 am

Wes_Wesley wrote:Shaq wasn't exactly a stiff on defense. In his prime he was a dominant two way player.

you can make the argument that he has had a better more celebrated career than Akeem.


Sure, but Hakeem was far from a stiff on offense, and while Shaq because of his size was decent on D (not good on pick and roll d btw) Hakeem was 2 leagues better. Shaq was better on O, but Hakeem was a lot better on D.
_BBIB_
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,622
And1: 16
Joined: May 23, 2007

 

Post#17 » by _BBIB_ » Thu Feb 7, 2008 7:57 am

Where are those numbers someone posted to show Shaq's inferior competition during his title runs?
ThaRegul8r
Head Coach
Posts: 6,448
And1: 3,037
Joined: Jan 12, 2006
   

 

Post#18 » by ThaRegul8r » Fri Feb 8, 2008 4:42 am

_BBIB_ wrote:Where are those numbers someone posted to show Shaq's inferior competition during his title runs?


Right here.
I remember your posts from the RPOY project, you consistently brought it. Please continue to do so, sir. This board needs guys like you to counteract ... worthless posters


Retirement isn’t the end of the road, but just a turn in the road. – Unknown
Phil Jackson
Banned User
Posts: 1,758
And1: 8
Joined: Jul 05, 2006

 

Post#19 » by Phil Jackson » Fri Feb 8, 2008 5:46 am

Kobe Bryant's sidekick

Return to Player Comparisons