Which *NEW* Big 3 would u take?
Moderators: penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063
Which *NEW* Big 3 would u take?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,606
- And1: 2,641
- Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Which *NEW* Big 3 would u take?
Boston Celtics
Kevin Garnett
Paul Pierce
Ray Allen
Los Angeles Lakers
Kobe Bryant
Pau Gasol
Andrew Bynum
Phoenix suns
Amare stoudemire
Steve Nash
Shaq
Kevin Garnett
Paul Pierce
Ray Allen
Los Angeles Lakers
Kobe Bryant
Pau Gasol
Andrew Bynum
Phoenix suns
Amare stoudemire
Steve Nash
Shaq

Any Pokémon fans out there? Check out my Youtube channel jchucollection
- zuppafly
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,020
- And1: 1,015
- Joined: Nov 05, 2005
- Location: Portugal
- Contact:
-
- Bucky O'Hare
- Banned User
- Posts: 1,000
- And1: 3
- Joined: Jan 23, 2008
- Location: Blazer Fans Love Me!
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,979
- And1: 55
- Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Kosta wrote:How about we extend the big 3 to Nash, Shaq, Amare, Hill, Bell and Barbosa.
I like the Suns a LOT now. They actually have depth after their big 3.
Exactly. I think the Shaq will actually help the Suns dramatically. Think of the Lakers in the '80s when Hakeem was on his last legs. He played slow, but that team played fast. That's how I think the Suns will be. They will still play fast, but now they have the versatility to play in a halfcourt offense, and play just as well.
BTW, can you just imagine Shaq in that offense? He is such a great passer from the paint that you just cannot do anything. If you double team him, he can pass to Amare who won't have any defenders on him, a slasher in Hill, or Nash, Bell or Barbosa to hit a three. If you single team him, he will just muscle his way through and dominate the paint.
Not only do I see the Suns as having the best "Big Three," But I see them as winning a championship in the next two seasons, if not winning in both, although chemistry seems to be their biggest obstacle.
- CousinOfDeath
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,066
- And1: 1,260
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
kookie_819 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Exactly. I think the Shaq will actually help the Suns dramatically. Think of the Lakers in the '80s when Hakeem was on his last legs. He played slow, but that team played fast. That's how I think the Suns will be. They will still play fast, but now they have the versatility to play in a halfcourt offense, and play just as well.
BTW, can you just imagine Shaq in that offense? He is such a great passer from the paint that you just cannot do anything. If you double team him, he can pass to Amare who won't have any defenders on him, a slasher in Hill, or Nash, Bell or Barbosa to hit a three. If you single team him, he will just muscle his way through and dominate the paint.
Not only do I see the Suns as having the best "Big Three," But I see them as winning a championship in the next two seasons, if not winning in both, although chemistry seems to be their biggest obstacle.
Don't you mean Kareem?
And I agree with the rest of your thoughts.
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 6,008
- And1: 18
- Joined: Sep 19, 2007
Kosta wrote:How about we extend the big 3 to Nash, Shaq, Amare, Hill, Bell and Barbosa.
I like the Suns a LOT now. They actually have depth after their big 3.
OK. Extend the Lakers' big 3 to Kobe, Gasol, Bynum, Odom, Farmar, Turiaf, Luke, Sasha, Ariza, Mihm, Fisher.
Lakers' depth and bench>>>>>>>>>Suns'.
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 1,948
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jan 27, 2008
- Location: San Francisco
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,353
- And1: 2
- Joined: Apr 03, 2006
Patterns wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
OK. Extend the Lakers' big 3 to Kobe, Gasol, Bynum, Odom, Farmar, Turiaf, Luke, Sasha, Ariza, Mihm, Fisher.
Lakers' depth and bench>>>>>>>>>Suns'.
I don't like Odom so much, he's a real great talent, but I don't know how good he can be as a complementary type player, can he play a lesser role and still be effective? I just think that guys like Bell, Barbosa and Hill can fit in perfect with the Suns big 3 and will get better playing off of them.
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 6,008
- And1: 18
- Joined: Sep 19, 2007
Kosta wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
I don't like Odom so much, he's a real great talent, but I don't know how good he can be as a complementary type player, can he play a lesser role and still be effective? I just think that guys like Bell, Barbosa and Hill can fit in perfect with the Suns big 3 and will get better playing off of them.
Odom doesn't want to be the second or even the third option. He's absolutely made for the 4th option which he will be. Odom likes being the "glue" guy and he's does the dirty work for us. If Odom, Gasol, Bynum can all average around 10 rebs, the Suns have no chance.
- NapoleonII
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,583
- And1: 4,895
- Joined: Aug 31, 2007
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 1,027
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 31, 2007