ImageImageImage

grizz trade idea

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

kakopedi1
Junior
Posts: 488
And1: 4
Joined: May 13, 2006

grizz trade idea 

Post#1 » by kakopedi1 » Fri Feb 8, 2008 2:42 am

Big Baby for Navarro? Mem has like 5 pgs and not many options at the 4 spot. Ainge was interested in Navarro this summer(I think) and would be a solid backup for, esp with Cassell coming out as being "misquoted" for hi buy out with LA.

Anywayz, I think Memphis could bite on BigBaby/Navarro trade.
User avatar
MVP16
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,342
And1: 3
Joined: Mar 05, 2006

 

Post#2 » by MVP16 » Fri Feb 8, 2008 2:49 am

We don't need Navarro, he just duplicates House.
EdSkae
Senior
Posts: 558
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 18, 2006

 

Post#3 » by EdSkae » Fri Feb 8, 2008 4:44 am

MVP16 wrote:We don't need Navarro, he just duplicates House.


Kyle Lowry is the PG the Celtics should be trying to get from the Grizzlies.
User avatar
ParticleMan
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,065
And1: 9,049
Joined: Sep 16, 2004
     

 

Post#4 » by ParticleMan » Fri Feb 8, 2008 4:56 am

we need Baby more than we need another shooter.

Lowry would be great but get real, they're not trading him.
User avatar
JahReid
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,451
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 25, 2004

 

Post#5 » by JahReid » Fri Feb 8, 2008 4:58 am

With Lowry/Crittenton/Conley, one is going to have to be traded in some deal they make. We can't give up a big though. Pruitt for Lowry if it works maybe.
User avatar
Al n' Perk No Layups!
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,532
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 30, 2006

 

Post#6 » by Al n' Perk No Layups! » Fri Feb 8, 2008 7:00 am

JahReid wrote:With Lowry/Crittenton/Conley, one is going to have to be traded in some deal they make. We can't give up a big though. Pruitt for Lowry if it works maybe.


Uhhh... not to be a jerk, but how is trading a point guard for another point guard gonna help clear up their PG problem?
kakopedi1
Junior
Posts: 488
And1: 4
Joined: May 13, 2006

 

Post#7 » by kakopedi1 » Fri Feb 8, 2008 7:11 am

I think Navarro is a much better fit for the C's than Lowry. Navarro is bigger and is a better shooter, both are nice players but JCN is a better fit.

But Cassell is my 1st choice but if we cant get him I'd love to see Juan Carlos Navarro as our backup.
User avatar
rambo_ortega
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,510
And1: 22
Joined: Jan 22, 2004

 

Post#8 » by rambo_ortega » Fri Feb 8, 2008 8:32 am

between the 3 of them, i want crittenton.
Image
Celtics_History_Lesson
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,983
And1: 6,269
Joined: Jul 10, 2003

 

Post#9 » by Celtics_History_Lesson » Fri Feb 8, 2008 12:00 pm

Here it is, this is a good deal for both teams.

To Boston: Casey Jacobsen, Juan Carlos Navarro, Darko Milicic

To the team that was moved from Vancouver because they have no fans: Gabe Pruitt, Kendrick Perkins, Tony Allen, Eddie House



The Grizzlies are dumping, and are not going to build around Darko and JCN. Memphis can save money here, they have Perkins and three ending contracts. The Celtics can send over some $$$ for their greedy owner to make the deal happen.

The Celtics get Navarro who can shoot and play the point guard spot, they get Darko who has real center size, and Casey Jacobsen is a good person on the bench too.

Perkins is not big enough to defend the best centers in the playoffs, Darko is the great Darko who has already won a championship.

A Darko-Big Baby team could not be defeated. Big Baby!
reggielewis
Veteran
Posts: 2,920
And1: 313
Joined: Nov 03, 2004

 

Post#10 » by reggielewis » Fri Feb 8, 2008 3:23 pm

perk isnt the greatest but Darko isnt leaps and bounds ahead of him! If we move Perk the only suitable, attainable person I would taregt would be Jeff Foster from Indy. I think he is good vet that knows his role. Not to mention Darko is expensive and not worth Tony imo.
User avatar
Collinto
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,601
And1: 25
Joined: Apr 10, 2001

 

Post#11 » by Collinto » Fri Feb 8, 2008 5:01 pm

Celtics_History_Lesson wrote:Here it is, this is a good deal for both teams.

To Boston: Casey Jacobsen, Juan Carlos Navarro, Darko Milicic

To the team that was moved from Vancouver because they have no fans: Gabe Pruitt, Kendrick Perkins, Tony Allen, Eddie House



The Grizzlies are dumping, and are not going to build around Darko and JCN. Memphis can save money here, they have Perkins and three ending contracts. The Celtics can send over some $$$ for their greedy owner to make the deal happen.

The Celtics get Navarro who can shoot and play the point guard spot, they get Darko who has real center size, and Casey Jacobsen is a good person on the bench too.

Perkins is not big enough to defend the best centers in the playoffs, Darko is the great Darko who has already won a championship.

A Darko-Big Baby team could not be defeated. Big Baby!


My feeling is any deal is a bad deal for the Celtics. Let's leave well enough alone...
SLCceltic
Analyst
Posts: 3,130
And1: 1,864
Joined: Mar 05, 2005
Location: Cabo San Lucas, México
 

 

Post#12 » by SLCceltic » Fri Feb 8, 2008 5:26 pm

Collinto wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



My feeling is any deal is a bad deal for the Celtics. Let's leave well enough alone...


amen people
we have a huge variety of skill and hunger and talent and desire

but from a business and futuring perspective-----trade powe, his stock is high and we would win the trade easily
ROYALGREEN
sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

 

Post#13 » by sully00 » Fri Feb 8, 2008 6:04 pm

Navarro isn't the answer at the point and while I like Lowry he is short and inexperienced, neither things that Doc is going to like going down the stretch.

This team has Pruitt long term the issue is for this season.
hiphop1
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,086
And1: 32
Joined: Aug 08, 2005
Location: hudson nh

 

Post#14 » by hiphop1 » Fri Feb 8, 2008 6:35 pm

sully00 wrote:Navarro isn't the answer at the point and while I like Lowry he is short and inexperienced, neither things that Doc is going to like going down the stretch.

This team has Pruitt long term the issue is for this season.

I too feel that this team is thinking long term with Pruitt. I think they see some real potential in the kid. They would be playing him trying to get the most the could for him if they didnt want to keep him. I think they are bringing him along slowly letting him learn the pg position. This kid got serious skills.
Free your mind and your a** will follow
BobbySura
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,416
And1: 343
Joined: Dec 31, 2005

 

Post#15 » by BobbySura » Fri Feb 8, 2008 7:00 pm

that darko deal wasn't terrible

but i think giving up both house and allen is a little much
sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

 

Post#16 » by sully00 » Fri Feb 8, 2008 7:09 pm

Speaking of guys I expected to surface about this time of year, were the hell is Bob Sura, he would actually fit the bill pretty well. He can handle the ball, play some point has a some size. Must be finished.
hiphop1
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,086
And1: 32
Joined: Aug 08, 2005
Location: hudson nh

 

Post#17 » by hiphop1 » Fri Feb 8, 2008 7:11 pm

sully00 wrote:Speaking of guys I expected to surface about this time of year, were the hell is Bob Sura, he would actually fit the bill pretty well. He can handle the ball, play some point has a some size. Must be finished.


Injuries ended his career.
Free your mind and your a** will follow
User avatar
JahReid
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,451
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 25, 2004

 

Post#18 » by JahReid » Sat Feb 9, 2008 12:46 am

Al n' Perk No Layups! wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Uhhh... not to be a jerk, but how is trading a point guard for another point guard gonna help clear up their PG problem?


I'm just saying the Celts aren't making any deal. Nothing makes sense. In fact the Celtics will make all of zero trades before the deadline. Jerk. 8)

Return to Boston Celtics