ImageImage

Al Horford's First Of Many 20 Rebs Night

Moderators: dms269, HMFFL, Jamaaliver

raleigh
Head Coach
Posts: 6,286
And1: 601
Joined: Oct 23, 2004

 

Post#41 » by raleigh » Sat Feb 9, 2008 12:37 am

tontoz wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



And i'll say it again, what was i wrong about?


*crickets*


Spare us.

You've pulled a Diesel with this season. You had your man in the draft, and when the Hawks selected a better player, you decided you simply can't stand the player.

You've never had an objective reason for being so critical of Horford. None. That's why I've never bothered arguing with you about him. It's just a silly game with you.

I don't have time for silly games.
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,211
And1: 4,998
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

 

Post#42 » by tontoz » Sat Feb 9, 2008 12:43 am

mrhonline wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Spare us.

You've pulled a Diesel with this season. You had your man in the draft, and when the Hawks selected a better player, you decided you simply can't stand the player.

You've never had an objective reason for being so critical of Horford. None. That's why I've never bothered arguing with you about him. It's just a silly game with you.

I don't have time for silly games.


You had time for that post but you didn't have time to answer my question? STFU with that BS. While i would have drafted Conley i was actually relieved when the picks were horford/Acie. I was afraid of Yi/Crit.

I have a very objective reason to be critical of horford. His offense has sucked. I have been very specific as to what he needs to do differently which for some reason you ignored.

Is there some reason why Horford can't drive against guys like Bogut, Big Z, Haywood, etc?

As far as who would have been best for the Hawks to draft at 3 that has yet to be fully answered. Right now the Hawks are still weak at the point and at C.
User avatar
High 5
RealGM
Posts: 15,657
And1: 2,185
Joined: Apr 21, 2006

 

Post#43 » by High 5 » Sat Feb 9, 2008 12:54 am

[quote="tontoz"][/quote]

What's funny is you don't even realize your hypocrisy.
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,211
And1: 4,998
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

 

Post#44 » by tontoz » Sat Feb 9, 2008 12:56 am

High 5 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



What's funny is you don't even realize your hypocrisy.


What's funnier is that you can't grasp the concept of sample size.
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,211
And1: 4,998
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

 

Post#45 » by tontoz » Sat Feb 9, 2008 1:01 am

What is funnier still is you don't realize that if Acie bombs at the point and Conley does well then i will have been proven right about who to pick at 3. We need a pg more than we need a 4/5.

If Acie doesn't work out how will we get a starting calibur pg?
User avatar
High 5
RealGM
Posts: 15,657
And1: 2,185
Joined: Apr 21, 2006

 

Post#46 » by High 5 » Sat Feb 9, 2008 1:05 am

tontoz wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



What's funnier is that you can't grasp the concept of sample size.


Because you weren't the guy who was comparing Horford's PER with Diop? Guess what! Diop plays exactly .1 minute less per game than Law. I can't spell it out any easier for you. Can you see it now?

But you will refuse to support Horford until he becames an MVP candidate, so I'm not going to waste anymore time on this. Go Hawks. Horford AND Law.
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,211
And1: 4,998
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

 

Post#47 » by tontoz » Sat Feb 9, 2008 1:26 am

High 5 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Because you weren't the guy who was comparing Horford's PER with Diop? Guess what! Diop plays exactly .1 minute less per game than Law. I can't spell it out any easier for you. Can you see it now?

But you will refuse to support Horford until he becames an MVP candidate, so I'm not going to waste anymore time on this. Go Hawks. Horford AND Law.


Diop has been in the league for years. He isn't a rookie. We already know his game. We know he isn't going to get significantly better than he is now if given more time.

Sample size doesn't just include this season.
User avatar
JoshB914
Head Coach
Posts: 6,889
And1: 2
Joined: Feb 16, 2006

 

Post#48 » by JoshB914 » Sat Feb 9, 2008 3:14 am

Damn, High. Nice work. You sold me too actually.
raleigh
Head Coach
Posts: 6,286
And1: 601
Joined: Oct 23, 2004

 

Post#49 » by raleigh » Sat Feb 9, 2008 3:17 am

But you will refuse to support Horford until he becames an MVP candidate, so I'm not going to waste anymore time on this.


Welcome.
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,211
And1: 4,998
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

 

Post#50 » by tontoz » Sat Feb 9, 2008 3:17 am

Funny how Smith can play on Big Z for 5 minutes and force the Cavs to take him out of the game by driving past Big Z routinely, exactly what i have been saying Horford should do.



Damn, High. Nice work. You sold me too actually.


Considering your inability to understand statistics and English i will take that as a compliment.
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,211
And1: 4,998
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

 

Post#51 » by tontoz » Sat Feb 9, 2008 3:25 am

mrhonline wrote:
But you will refuse to support Horford until he becames an MVP candidate, so I'm not going to waste anymore time on this.


Welcome.


Keep dodging the question.

Before the season i said Horford was a weak scorer and would struggle to guard bigger players. So what exactly was i wrong about?

You just pull comments out of your ass with nothing to back them up.

And while you are busy ignoring that question i have another one for you to ignore.

Why can't Horford take big Z off the dribble like Smith did so easily?

Return to Atlanta Hawks