ImageImage

[Game Thread] Portland @ Detroit

Moderators: DeBlazerRiddem, Moonbeam

User avatar
Klinky
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,781
And1: 536
Joined: Jul 28, 2006
Location: Blazersland
   

 

Post#61 » by Klinky » Sat Feb 9, 2008 3:17 am

At least we only lost by 9pts.
Circus Americano!
ph1sh55
Senior
Posts: 722
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 02, 2007

 

Post#62 » by ph1sh55 » Sat Feb 9, 2008 3:43 am

really liked what McRoberts brought
User avatar
Mr Odd
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,081
And1: 8
Joined: Jul 08, 2003

 

Post#63 » by Mr Odd » Sat Feb 9, 2008 4:31 am

I loved what I saw out of LMA, Frye, McRoberts, Sergio & Raef.
All of those guys were very active & I thought played smart.
Sergio couldnt finish on his scoring drives, but they all were
in & out'ers. I would of liked to seen more of the players above.

Jack again tried to be something hes not.. .

My fav thing of the night is when Blake was bringing
the ball up the court, not yet passed the half court
line & Jack ran back from up court to Blake with
his hands held out asking for the ball & Blake
gave Jack a look like "umm no im the PG".
:lol:
Image
bing'o-bang'o-bong'o-baby!!
TBpup
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,907
And1: 247
Joined: Jan 07, 2004
Location: Financial Planning office in L.O.
       

 

Post#64 » by TBpup » Sat Feb 9, 2008 6:16 am

Jack finished with 6 turnovers......the entire rest of the Blazers squad, all eleven that plays only had a combined 5 turnovers. Again, that is 204 minutes played by ten players with a combined 5 turnovers, 36 minutes played by one player with 6 turnovers....and yet he is the one most rewarded with playing time. (Like this is an isolated incident) :noway:

Given this logic, our beloved Ha would have played 48 minutes every game.
:banghead:

:starwars
@TBpup22
User avatar
Mr Odd
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,081
And1: 8
Joined: Jul 08, 2003

 

Post#65 » by Mr Odd » Sat Feb 9, 2008 6:32 am

TBpup wrote:Jack finished with 6 turnovers......the entire rest of the Blazers squad, all eleven that plays only had a combined 5 turnovers. Again, that is 204 minutes played by ten players with a combined 5 turnovers, 36 minutes played by one player with 6 turnovers....and yet he is the one most rewarded with playing time. (Like this is an isolated incident) :noway:

Given this logic, our beloved Ha would have played 48 minutes every game.
:banghead:

:starwars


LOL!!
Ha!!
-

Its double standards in how Nate treats Jack.
I dont know how anyone can see it different.
Unless im missing something??
Image
bing'o-bang'o-bong'o-baby!!
User avatar
Fitz303
General Manager
Posts: 8,198
And1: 1,839
Joined: Oct 18, 2006
Location: Portland

 

Post#66 » by Fitz303 » Sat Feb 9, 2008 8:22 am

Bench Sergio!! Move Green up!! Green showed some good stuff tonight

Also loved what I saw from McRoberts. Hopefully he moves up in the depth chart and gets some minutes somehow this season.

And if ever there was a time to bring in Miles to add some depth, now would be the time
broyblazin
Junior
Posts: 255
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 19, 2007

 

Post#67 » by broyblazin » Sat Feb 9, 2008 2:00 pm

I say we bench Jack. Anyone who thinks the guy is good needs to take off their blinders. For every game he helps us win, he helps us lose another ten. The human turnover machine, one of the worst guards at running a fastbreak in the entire league. Any positives he brings to the table are negated by his inability to take care of the ball. Please, anyone argue the above points. Their not opinion, but fact.
Billy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,623
And1: 161
Joined: Aug 14, 2001
 

 

Post#68 » by Billy » Sat Feb 9, 2008 4:52 pm

I really liked Green's intensity. It's nice seeing a point guard on the Blazers actually press the other guy.

That McRoberts pass at the end to LaFrentz was great.

Pretty much expected a blowout. To nobody besides Aldridge showed up.
taufblazers33
Starter
Posts: 2,356
And1: 654
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Chicago
   

 

Post#69 » by taufblazers33 » Sat Feb 9, 2008 5:41 pm

i like jack
ADawg22 wrote:Cavs announcer sounds like he has an orgasm everytime one of their players score.
User avatar
BlackMamba
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,297
And1: 81
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Location: Cd. de M
         

 

Post#70 » by BlackMamba » Sat Feb 9, 2008 9:38 pm

well, losing vs. a team like detroit for only 9 pts when your top player and leader is not playing isn't that bad.

plus, seeing players like mcroberts and green with "extended" minutes is a good thing to see how they look as a blazer player.

judgeing only by numbers i think green and mcroberts could deserve more mins depending on how the blazers are looking through the season, they both have it tough, specially green.

so, what was the best part and the worst part of roy missing this game?
User avatar
Klinky
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,781
And1: 536
Joined: Jul 28, 2006
Location: Blazersland
   

 

Post#71 » by Klinky » Sat Feb 9, 2008 9:42 pm

The game was worthwhile in letting some deeper bench players get some real experience. Of course Detroit was doing exactly the same thing. It was our runts vs their runts. So I wouldn't really say we could feel good about only losing by 9, as their starters seemed to have left the game before we made a tiny comeback.
Circus Americano!
User avatar
swede
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,771
And1: 6
Joined: Oct 18, 2005
Location: Z-Bo: Cuz the NBA aint got Roger Goodell.

 

Post#72 » by swede » Sat Feb 9, 2008 9:47 pm

We would have lost by 40 points if they kept their starters in.
Cyborg21 wrote:Screw you Batum, throwing us under the bus, I hope we destroy these scum next year.

Return to Portland Trail Blazers