Daily Papers - February 8, 2008
Moderators: 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX
-
BIGSMOOTH79
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,111
- And1: 0
- Joined: Aug 23, 2006
- Location: Montreal-Toronto
-
Tom Baker
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,004
- And1: 6
- Joined: Feb 14, 2007
- Location: Tom Baker achieved!
Dwibble wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
There would be nothing wrong with her ribs if she stood up straight. It looks like she's got one foot in an ice bucket and the other on a bag of bananas. If she wants to look better, she should stay away from swimsuits the colour of rat snot.
Ex-girlfriend who ran off with your brother?
-
Contract Season
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,821
- And1: 31
- Joined: Feb 17, 2003
- Location: Toronto
Schadenfreude wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Those are also some serious ribs...not that my negative-one-pack-having self should comment.
And boy, I bet that every Toronto beat writer was gleefully awaiting this date so that they could put out their 'thanks for the memories, but not really' 1000 gamestraveganza. Except that everyone and their voodoo priest had the same idea, so we not only get to enjoy multiple 'this is your life' treatments, but two from the same newspaper. Wolstat and Fidlin (who!?), you might want to chat every once in a while.
Well if you'd actually bothered to read the articles instead of just the short snippet SS provided you'd see that one was an article picking out specific round number games (game 1, game 100, game 200, etc.) while one was just a chart listing several of the most memorable games ... but obviously that's too much work and it's easier to criticize.
-
Schad
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 58,538
- And1: 18,043
- Joined: Feb 08, 2006
- Location: The Goat Rodeo
-
Contract Season wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Well if you'd actually bothered to read the articles instead of just the short snippet SS provided you'd see that one was an article picking out specific round number games (game 1, game 100, game 200, etc.) while one was just a chart listing several of the most memorable games ... but obviously that's too much work and it's easier to criticize.
Heh, I did read both before posting; it's just that the Wolstat article was so mind-bogglingly dull (chronicling exactly six moments, in vivid two-sentence detail) that, had the two discussed their ideas, I thought that Wolstat might have dropped the '1000 games look back' angle and written something with substance.
**** your asterisk.
-
Contract Season
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,821
- And1: 31
- Joined: Feb 17, 2003
- Location: Toronto
Schadenfreude wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Heh, I did read both before posting; it's just that the Wolstat article was so mind-bogglingly dull (chronicling exactly six moments, in vivid two-sentence detail) that, had the two discussed their ideas, I thought that Wolstat might have dropped the '1000 games look back' angle and written something with substance.
Ah, well there's where the Internet can cause problems.
You thought they were two stand-alone stories.
In the actual newspaper, the one piece was a full-length piece, while the other was a tiny chart.
They weren't two separate stories, the chart accompanied the bigger piece.